Daily Kos

State Department reports on anti-Semitism

Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 10:59:09 AM PDT

Another story from The Jerusalem Post:

The [State] Department's first-ever Report on Global Anti-Semitism, mandated by a new congressional law signed by President Bush in October, documents anti-Semitic acts around the world between July 2003 and December 2004.

The State Department already reports on anti-Semitism in its International Religious Freedom Report and its Country Reports on Human Rights Practices. But legislators, led by Rep. Tom Lantos (D-California), the only Holocaust survivor elected to Congress, found such reporting inadequate and pushed for the legislation requiring the separate annual report, and also the appointment of a new US special envoy on anti-Semitism. That position has not yet been filled.

"The increasing frequency and severity of anti-Semitic incidents since the start of the 21st century, particularly in Europe, has compelled the international community to focus on anti-Semitism with renewed vigor," the report says.


Here is a position likely to be adopted by Bush on whether anti-Israel criticism is anti-Semitic criticism...more abuse of the symbols of Nazism around the world.

The report made clear that it did not deem all anti-Israel rhetoric to be anti-Semitic but that the lines between the two were becoming increasingly blurred.

"An important issue is the distinction between legitimate criticism of policies and practices of the State of Israel, and commentary that assumes an anti-Semitic character. The demonization of Israel, or vilification of Israeli leaders, sometimes through comparisons with Nazi elders, and through the use of Nazi symbols to caricature them, indicates an anti-Semitic bias rather than a valid criticism of policy concerning a controversial issue," it says.

More confusion of anti-Semitism and anti-Israel attitudes:

The report noted that in Western Europe, traditional far-right groups still "account for a significant proportion of the attacks against Jews and Jewish properties." But it noted that "disadvantaged and disaffected Muslim youths increasingly were responsible for most of the other incidents."

"The recent rise in anti-Jewish acts and sentiments in Western Europe was often influenced by Middle Eastern events or conflated with anti-Israeli views," it says.

In Eastern Europe, the "stereotype of Jews as manipulators of the global economy continues to provide fertile ground for anti-Semitic aggression," according to the report.

More Holocaust abuse. It is interesting that the Arab media accept the fact of the Holocaust.

The report also detailed the spread of anti-Zionist propaganda, particularly in Arab media, that "frequently adopts the terminology and symbols of the Holocaust to demonize Israel and its leaders."

I think we know the writer meant "serious problem". This seems to be a very small solution, and to mean that anti-Semitism is not being taken very seriously by the legal establishment in some places. The Palestinian election and its aftermath should help with some of the borderline anti-Israel cases.

The report called for countries, where anti-Semitism is a series problem, to beef up specialized training for police and members of the judiciary, to teach them how to confront anti-Semitic acts more effectively.

"Many nations still do not have hate crime laws that address anti-Semitic and other intolerance-related crimes. In some instances where such laws already exist, stronger enforcement is needed," it said.

This is sickening.

The report provided a country-by-country breakdown of attacks, both verbal and physical, over the past 18 months. France reported 510 anti-Semitic incidents in the first six months of 2004 alone, compared with 593 for all of 2003. In Belgium, the report described the stabbing of a youth in Antwerp, and the heckling of a Maccabi soccer club by the opposite team, which taunted the players with shouts of "Heil Hitler."

In the Czech Republic, vandals toppled 80 tombstones in a Jewish cemetery. In Germany, an ancient Jewish cemetery in Dusseldorf was desecrated in June. Similar incidents were reported around the world.

Shoot away! I am interested in mandos and cedwyn's responses. I think I have a good quote for cedwyn from Tom Segev.  
The Jerusalem Post is much less aggressively conservative on its website than when Hollinger owned it. The first links are all actual news, and they do not try to firmly direct you to a conservative editorial. Lord Black seems to be a very sleazy character.

Poll

Can anti-Israel rhetoric be anti-Semitic?

9%1 votes
9%1 votes
45%5 votes
36%4 votes
0%0 votes

| 11 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 11 comments

  •  Clever (4.00 / 2)

    Clever mixing of peas and potatoes ... in an attempt to throw a lot of dust in the air and confuse people.

    A lot of real trouble mixed with nonsense.

    The only way to go up against anti-Semitism is to actually go up against it.

    This looks a lot like an attempt to co-opt sympathetic feelings toward Jewish and use this to defend the Bush administration's support of the controversial Sharon administration in Israel.

    Welcome to the Great Foreclosure.

    by bink on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 10:40:31 AM PDT

    •  Typo (none / 0)

      "Feelings toward Jewish" should be "feelings toward Jewish people."

      Welcome to the Great Foreclosure.

      by bink on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 10:42:42 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Bushies, hiding behind good peeps (none / 1)

      It's a pattern.

      The Bushies are cloaking their stingy humanitarian policies behind the generosity of Americans as private individuals.

      The frame: To attack Bush policy is to attack Americans.

      God, what losers.

      What kind of traitor puts the Constitution first and the candidate second? :)

      by cskendrick on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 10:47:08 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Bush may use it for that (none / 0)

      There are some interesting passages in "Plan of Attack" where Bush appears to see through Sharon and know that he is far from perfect, but to stand by Israel all the same. Bush may have stood aside from trying to make peace because there are no partners for peace on either side.
      Are you saying the report implies that "the only way to go against anti-Semitism is to go against it?" There are two attitudes here: one is that some anti-Semitism is unacceptable, no matter what Israel does. This has to be confronted. The report said this. Another one is that if Israel respected human rights(G-d forbid), ceased to exist, or became a binational state, anti-Semitism would be reduced to an acceptable level. I think that if you are saying that the report promotes unquestioning support for Israel, you have sympathy with the second attitude.

      -4.00, -5.33 "We don't watch any talking heads or any politics. We watch "SportsCenter" and argue about that."--Barack Obama

      by 4jkb4ia on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 10:56:40 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Thank You (none / 0)

        Thanks for your reply.  I'm going to try to do some detailed reading and maybe I'll diarize later, if I come up with something else substantive to say about this.  Stay tuned ...  Thanks for making not of this at any rate.

        Welcome to the Great Foreclosure.

        by bink on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 12:12:43 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Excellent diary (2.00 / 2)

    Prepare to get pummeled by the "anti-Zionists".
    •  I know (2.00 / 2)

      I was going to put out a tip jar, to see how many troll ratings I got, but decided that this was too much vanity.

      -4.00, -5.33 "We don't watch any talking heads or any politics. We watch "SportsCenter" and argue about that."--Barack Obama

      by 4jkb4ia on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 10:57:48 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  I wonder (none / 0)

    when the State Department is going to write a report on anti-Muslim incidents... or anti-Hindu incidents.

    This is ridiculous.  And you can be sure that "anti-Israel" comments or "anti-Zionist" comments are always interpreted as anti-Semitic.  Always.

    And before anyone goes nuclear, be aware I don't support hatred or violence against any group or individual for any reason.

    Pax

    Night and day you can find me Flogging the Simian

    by Soj on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 11:55:33 AM PDT

    •  Or (none / 0)

      When is the Bush Administration going to talk about anti-gay hate crimes, which are common, under-reported and deadly?

      Still, I don't want to get into a pissing contest over who is the biggest victim.  Anti-Semitism exists and it is a real problem.

      I believe that the right and the religious right want to use anti-Semitism as a Trojan horse to ram pro-Likud policy down the necks of Americans and the Middle East.  More on this later, perhaps, after a bit of research.

      Welcome to the Great Foreclosure.

      by bink on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 12:15:34 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  It's all in the delivery (none / 1)

      This is ridiculous.  And you can be sure that "anti-Israel" comments or "anti-Zionist" comments are always interpreted as anti-Semitic.  Always.

      I think your comment is bullshit, and I'd be interested in seeing some substantiation for your claim.  In the meantime, however, I'll say that I think it's all in the delivery, whether a critic opens himself up to a claim of anti-Semitism.  

      For example, if you were to say "I don't like the Israeli policy of building and expanding settlements in the West Bank -- it makes it that much harder to achieve a Palestinian state, it often results from confiscation of Palestinian-owned land, and it inflames the local population," only an idiot would call that statement anti-Semitic.  And I would be first in line to call the person flinging a claim of anti-Semitism an idiot.

      The reason is, the comment is focused on the specific policy and the results of the policy, and uses measured, non-inflammatory language.  

      On the other hand, if someone was to say "Israeli settlement policies are pure Nazi tactics," that would rightfully be open to a claim of anti-Semitism.  The person has deliberately chosen a comparison -- to Nazis -- that is designed to inflict maximum pain to Jews, because of the harm Nazism inflicted on the Jewish people. Now, the person making such a comparison would probably protest that they were making the statement about Israelis, not Jews per se, but that would be a feeble protest and one would have to be quite naive to believe it.  Of course the statement is directed at Israel as a Jewish state, and not intended to characterize the Israeli Arab minority as Nazis. It is possible that the person simply wasn't thinking, and picked the first comparison that came to mind, but again, that's pretty feeble. I may have been born on a Thursday, but it wasn't last Thursday.

      So that's an example of the difference between a valid criticism of Israel, and an anti-Semitic statement.

      In loving memory: Sophie, June 1, 1993-January 17, 2005. My huckleberry friend.

      by Paul in Berkeley on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 12:29:32 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Another example (none / 0)

      Another example of how a "criticism" can stray into anti-Semitic territory is when people make comments to the effect that US foreign policy is effectively controlled and directed by Ariel Sharon/Likud/Israel.  On its face, the comment is simply absurd -- a huge country, the biggest economy in the world, the most powerful military in the world, being controlled by one of the smallest countries, one that is highly dependent on US foreign aid?  

      The reason such a comment could go from being merely idiotic to anti-Semitic is that it ties into a centuries-old anti-Semitic charge that an international conspiracy of Jews controls the world's banking, media, etc.  It's a variation of an old, hateful theme.

      And by the way, the Justice Department ought to be conducting the study you mused about -- it ought to be studying whether there's been an uptick in anti-Muslim, anti-Arab incidents in the US, especially since 9/11.  I'm sure there has, and it shouldn't be ignored.

      In loving memory: Sophie, June 1, 1993-January 17, 2005. My huckleberry friend.

      by Paul in Berkeley on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 01:08:03 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Permalink | 11 comments