Skip to main content

Here's a thought:  Could Cheney have had a vendetta against Brewster Jennings/Valerie Plame over something completely unrelated to WMD or Iraq?  This is one angle which has had little airplay but may deserve some inspection.

If Cheney had some irrational need for payback (perhaps only triggered when learning that Mrs. Wilson was THE Valerie Plame of THE Brewster-Jennings) that may explain the bad judgment that made her fair game in his mind - regardless of the consequences for national security.

Apparently, Cheney had been incensed with the CIA when they appeared to block an half-billion Import-Export Bank loan for a Russian oil company, Tyumen Oil,  that Cheney was intent on securing funds for so they could hire his company, Halliburton, back in the late `90s.  Although the deal eventually went through the experience left Cheney disgusted with "enemies" at the State Department and the CIA.  Would sweet old Uncle Dick remember that snub when he made himself Vice President?

Hmmmmm.  Valerie Plame does deep cover as an "Energy consultant" with a CIA front company, Brewster Jennings.  

Which part of the CIA  do you think would be warning the Import-Export Bank that the loan to Tyumen Oil was too risky?  

Anyway,  this incident is related by Jane Mayer in an important profile she did of Cheney for the New Yorker back in February '04.  (About half-way down) though the article has several other dropping shoes worthy of being similarly brought back to light.  (Read about the dove-tailing of Energy and National Security Policy under the aegis of that top-secret Energy Task Force....hmmmm - that was an interesting policy decision no one else has ever picked up or explored, too)

Here's that link:

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040216fa_fact

 I found this of interest and wondered if it would go someway to explaining the decision to target Plame - AND Brewster Jennings.  I know people have been speculating that perhaps the Brewster Jennings crew were zeroing in on some funny BushCo Terror money links, but the idea that it could have been something so much more mundane as just kicking those bastards when he had a chance has a logic to it as well.

It's the kind of irrational motive, the desire for petty vengence, that seems to run in the veins of these maniacal types and so often predicates their downfalls.  

Further to this, I also wonder if part this is orchestrated to ensure that Cheney doesn't run for President in 2008.  Although continuing to pretend no interest in the throne (see Richard III) Cheney has been lining up his ducks for some time now.  Wasn't that the reason why his medical issues of the last few months have been so under-reported?  The fear that that might weaken his chances?

Odds are Bush knew full well about the whole campaign against Wilson. (Spite and dirty tricks are the things Bush loves about Politics) but there seems no chance they are going to let him take the hit on this.  From Cheney's pov, obviously, nothing could suit him more than seeing Bush go down in flames but the old guard is gathering around Bush to ensure that the Cheney-Rumsfeld cabal is the meme that rules the day.

(Of course, the President could have another Pretzel crisis.  If Cheney can find any means of seizing the throne before the FitzGerald indictments go to trial then, obviously, all bets are off.)

Originally posted to padraig pearse on Sat Oct 22, 2005 at 06:54 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Click here for the mobile view of the site