17 Best-Rated Comments, Oct 24 2005

Results (after the jump) are as of October 25 12:05:38 PM (Eastern time).

The list is updated every half hour. Why not check back frequently?

17. Oh, Good Grierf! lol
posted by PhillyGal on 10/24/2005 14:27:20 EDT
attached to Kill the Fitzmas talk

16. Kay Bailey Hutchison
posted by linnie on 10/24/2005 13:59:02 EDT
attached to Radnofsky to Hutchison: Resign if you tolerate perjury

13. (tie) Intelligent Design or Evolution?
posted by Agent of Fortune on 10/24/2005 01:41:21 EDT
attached to You might be a Bush-hatin' patriotic American if...

13. (tie) aren't we just having fun?
posted by Maccabee on 10/24/2005 15:51:53 EDT
attached to Kill the Fitzmas talk

13. (tie) I will celebrate...
posted by mikedallas23 on 10/24/2005 14:26:44 EDT
attached to Kill the Fitzmas talk

10. (tie) If you feel like you're trapped in a
posted by melvin on 10/24/2005 01:23:33 EDT
attached to You might be a Bush-hatin' patriotic American if...

10. (tie) another perspective
posted by chumley on 10/24/2005 09:41:45 EDT
attached to Bush is Coming Unglued

10. (tie) GWB has been saved.....repeatedly.
posted by PRESSmUP on 10/24/2005 15:36:35 EDT
attached to This Explains George W. Bush

9. Nobody home
posted by Buffalo Girl on 10/24/2005 10:00:34 EDT
attached to Bush is Coming Unglued

8. we knew
posted by avenueb on 10/24/2005 14:25:17 EDT
attached to Kill the Fitzmas talk

7. please
posted by Glic on 10/24/2005 09:20:52 EDT
attached to Bush is Coming Unglued

5. (tie) Before
posted by shanikka on 10/24/2005 10:06:17 EDT
attached to Bush is Coming Unglued

5. (tie) I diaried this too
posted by Reality based mom on 10/24/2005 14:13:24 EDT
attached to Wurmser Passed Plame's Name to Libby & Hadley

4. Excellent!
posted by Miss Blue on 10/24/2005 13:30:17 EDT
attached to Radnofsky to Hutchison: Resign if you tolerate perjury

3. I'm sure he would
posted by Billy Shears on 10/24/2005 09:43:26 EDT
attached to Bush is Coming Unglued

2. I for one would not be celebrating
posted by elmo on 10/24/2005 14:25:07 EDT
attached to Kill the Fitzmas talk

1. It's a more common malady
posted by Cheez Whiz on 10/24/2005 09:27:16 EDT
attached to Bush is Coming Unglued

If...

...I had added the qualification that only three comments on the list could come from any single diary, the following comments would have made the list, with these ranks:

13. you try making paula jones
posted by rasbobbo on 10/24/2005 11:54:00 EDT
attached to How Much Does It Cost? Fitzgerald v. Starr

14. (tie) Bush is a fucking punk
posted by bebacker on 10/24/2005 15:36:18 EDT
attached to This Explains George W. Bush

14. (tie) There are not enough words
posted by eugene on 10/24/2005 22:06:25 EDT
attached to Civil Rights Pioneer Rosa Parks Dead At 92

16. (tie) two favorites
posted by OrangeClouds115 on 10/24/2005 02:40:59 EDT
attached to You might be a Bush-hatin' patriotic American if...

16. (tie) $20 Million!! Dollars and one
posted by PhillyGal on 10/24/2005 11:50:15 EDT
attached to How Much Does It Cost? Fitzgerald v. Starr

How It's Done

Point values are assigned to each comment's ratings: 2 for Excellent, 1 for Good, 0 for Marginal, -2 for Unproductive, and -3 for Troll. These values are added, then the comments ranked.

Comments must have at least 7 ratings to qualify.

Also, to qualify for today's list, comments must be attached to a diary or main page story posted on October 24, Pacific time.

"Tip jar" comments are excluded, since well-received diaries are recognized through the Recommended Diaries mechanism.

To do this, all comments diarists make to their own diaries are excluded. This may exclude other well-rated comments diarists make to their own diaries. But then, diarists can edit their diaries to include the content of their well-received comments, then hope for recognition in the Recommended Diaries.

Finally, I excluded Cheers and Jeers, because that thing is just an insane mojo rave.

•  tip jar

  enjoy!

  by social democrat on Sun Oct 23, 2005 at 09:18:42 PM PDT

•  I realize that this is not an open thread

  But I just can't resist the following pithy observation:

  Headline on CNN.com says: Vatican Stands Firm on Priestly Celibacy

  Surely I am not the only person who finds that slightly Freudian headline hilarious!

  Am I alone?

  by NCYellowDog on Sun Oct 23, 2005 at 10:09:47 PM PDT

  •  confused...

    ...it's hard for me to see where you're coming from here.

    by social democrat on Sun Oct 23, 2005 at 10:59:31 PM PDT

    •  what does he mean, this isn't an open thread ???

      I'm more confused than you, NA NA

      /think about it sd, the Vatican is standing firm on it's celibcy policy

      which means that the Vatican will continue to hide the fact that the so called celibate priests are molesting altar boys, and continue to aid and abett pedophile priests fleeing prosecution

      what other policy has the Vatican and this lying Pope ever had

      by knowthings on Mon Oct 24, 2005 at 01:18:12 AM PDT

•  Yay

  Placeholder so I can find it again

  by Stink Tank on Mon Oct 24, 2005 at 06:35:27 AM PDT