Skip to main content

http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/

Really explosive stuff, some of the stuff Josh Marshall was discussing in TPM.  Richard Sale is apparently UPI's intelligence correspondent.

(Edited by request, after some effort. I learned a lil HTML today. Yes I realize that makes me sophisticated circa 1994.)

THE NIGER FORGERIES
How Did Allegations from Discredited Documents End Up in a State of the Union Speech?
By Richard Sale, Intelligence Correspondent

DOUG FEITH'S BACKCHANNEL
In December 2001, there was a secret meeting in Rome attended by MICHAEL LEDEEN, a paid consultant to Panorama, the Italian magazine that first broke the story of the Niger documents, Defense Department official, LARRY FRANKLN, since indicted for passing classified information to Israel, the classified documents outlining US policy towards Iran and U.S activities in Iraq. HAROLD RHODE, another DOD official was there, and, like FRANKLIN, was from the office of DOUG FEITH Undersecretary of Defense for Policy.

More below the fold.

Also attending was Iran-Contra figure MANUCHER GHORBANIFAR, an Iranian fabricator of inteliligence about whom the CIA had issued a "burn notice" that the man and his information were not reliable and to avoid employing him. According to former and serving U.S. intelligence sources the secret meetings between Pentagon officials and associates of Ghorbanifar in Europe had been going on for almost two years, a full year longer than the Bush administration acknowledged. Ghorbanifar told Laura Rozen of the Washington Monthly of three meetings, but U.S. inteligence officials have confirmed to this reporter that while the Pentagon originally told the Washington Post that Rhode had simply run into Ghorbanifar in Paris in June 2003, Ghorbanifar told Rozen that the two men spent weeks planning the meeting. Further, U.S. intellligence officials said that the Italian military intelligence organization, SISMI, provided logistics and security for the December 2001 Rome meeting.

In fact, the head of SISMI, NICOLO POLLARIi, as well as the Italian Defense Minister, ANTONIO MARTINO, attended the meeting. Martino, it should be noted, is a member of JINSA, the hardline,, right-wing pro-Israeli organization. Since Ledeen is a also member of JINSA and has often been a keynote speaker, the link is not unimportant. According to Rozen, who confirmed details with this reporter,Ghorbanifar told her he had had fifty meetings with Michael Ledeen since September 11th,2001 and that he had given Ledeen "4,000 to 5,000 pages of sensitive documents" concerning Iran, Iraq and the Middle East, "material no one else has received." Ghorbanifar, speaking to Rozen by telephone from France, says those meetings took place abroad because he has been refused a US visa the last two times he has applied.

Ghorbanifar also told Rozen that he had meetings with an assortment of U.S. officials whose identities have not yet been determined. Former senior U.S. intelligence officials told this reporter that the secret meeting took place at a Sismi safe house in Rome's Piazza di Spagna. While Pollari told Rozen that Ghorbanifar was not present, U.S. intelligece officials told this reporter that he was. Later officials from Feith's office would claim that the Pentagon officials who attended the meeting did not know in advance that Ghorbanifar was going to be there and were surprised by his presence).

Here are some excerpts of Rozen's interview with Pollari: Pollari: "It's true, we organized the meeting in Rome with the Iranians, but Ghorbanifar wasn't there. We didn't know these Iranians. One of them even asked us how to write his name. Anyway, the meeting. This is how it went. A minister calls me up. Who? No names. He tells me that the Pentagon wants to organize a meeting with some Iranians. They've got some information about matters concerning our national security. So I get to work. I keep an eye on things through two of my men. But all they talk about is tripe. But above all, oil contracts. ENI [Italian State Petroleum]. Concessions for new exploitation. Lines of credit for tens of millions of dollars ... As if the Sismi is some sort of hawkers' mart where you buy and sell. I decide to alert the government. I spell out my misgivings about our institutional role ... I want to avoid any future misunderstandings..."
THE WILSON MISSION
The Plame controversy began when Vice President Dick Cheney learned from a CIA briefer about the Niger documents and demanded to know more about the Niger Embassy break-in of Jan. 2 2001 during which the documents had been seized. The briefer went back to the agency and there was a meeting at the CIA of the Counterproliferation division, VALERIE PLAME, the wife of former diplomat JOE WILSON, in attendance, Plame was approached by a senior agency offical and asked if her husband would be willing to investigate allegations made in the Niger documents that Saddam Huseein was attempting to purchase 500 tones of yellow cake uranium. The CIA official thought iWilson a good choice to send to Niger since he was a former Ambassador to Gabon and a U.S. Embassy official in Iraq during Gulf War. In any case, It was Plame's boss and other senior agency Counterproliferatoin officials who okayed the trip, putting Wilson on a a per diem. In a June 10, memo written by the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research, a five-page long classified memo was sent to Marc Grossman. In it was a line (one line) referring in passing to the Wilson mission, mentioning "a CIA meeting apparently convened by Valier Wilson."

This was in error. But no one asked for a correction because no oneat the time ever thought that Plame's name would be leaked and also because the document was classified. Wilson met in Niger in Niamy with Ambassador Owens-Kirkpatrick and a 3-star Army Gen. Fulfer from a senior commander of Eurcom. Fulfer came to believe the Niger story to be horseshit just as Wilson did. Wilson returned to Washington in early March and met with various people in the agency and intelligence community including the State Department's African Affairs Bureau to report on is findings. On March 9, CIA cabled Wilson's doubts to the intel community and passed a memo with his comments to White House, according to former senior CIA officials But the chief point is that Plame did not have the authority to initiate any mission regarding the Niger charges. She was, after all, under cover, and her identity was classified.

On July 7, the INR memo was readdressed to Coliin Powell. But the first version, five pages and classified, was sent to White House communications and forwarded to Air Force One where it was received by Ari Fleisher. The special prosecutor has subpoened the Air Force One phone records.

THE BREAK IN The Niger Embassy in Rome had, for decades, been a target for SISMI (Italian Military intelligence) eavewsdroppers. The Niger Embassy was broken into on Jan. 2, 2001. The place had been trashed and ransacked and Aarfou Mounkaila, the second secretry, reported the crime to the carabinieri. However, very little was stolen except a Breil steel watch and three small vials of perfume.

What was missing was documents. The agents at SISMI would receive a thick packet of documents in exchange for cash. The documents included a codebook, a series of letters laying the groundwork for a 1999 visit to Niger by Wassam al-Zahawiah, Iraq's Ambassador to the Holy See, and few telexes, one with the heading "003/99/ABNI/Rome." . None of this would appear to be very siinister except, one -- the intelligence contained in the documents had been fabricated and found to be false and two -- Michael Ledeen, a prominent neocon, was at the time, a "paid consultant" to SISMI," according to former very senior U.S. intelliegence officials. His ties dated back to the 1980s.

The Italian Parliamentry Committe for Intelligence oversight, which is a single committee made up of reps from the Italian Senate and Chamber of deputies, did an investigation. They quickly determined that the data was forged, and, not in Italy but in the United States. Ledeen's name surfaced in the probe of the committee which was trying to determine what role he had played, if any. Nevertheless, SISMI, whose headquarters are at Forte Braschi, had already acted. Its liason had forwarded the details of the supposed sale of Niger yellow cake to Iraq to Britain's MI-6 and, following a number of meetings in Rome MI-6 passed on a summary of the information to the US labeled "reliable." The summary sent to the British was called, "Recriprocal Exchange of Information." SISMI did not in any way reveal how it had obtained the information to protect sources and methods. MI-6 forwarded the summary to the CIA where it was not given much notice. It was seen as third-hand uncorroborated information. For example, it was not included in the President's Daily Brief (PDF.)

SISMI also sent copies of the data to Ita'y's Executive Committe of the Intelligence and Security Service ((CESIS) and sent a copy to the Italian Foreign Ministry and Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi.The African Directorates in the Foreign Ministry was quick to raise "strong objections" and "reservations" about the accuracy of the information forwarded to MI-6 and the CIA. State"s INR was quick to brand the intelligence as "junk." "A whole lot of things told us that the stuff was junk," a former INR official told this reporter. Among the tell-tale signs of fraud:: the centerpiece of the documents was a three-page memorandum of understanding (MOU) between Iraq and Niger dated July 6, 2000. It was signed by Niger President Tandja Mamadou and Allele Habibou, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation, and it spoke of a bilatersal deal for five hundred tons of uranium oxide which was "legal and authorized under the Niger constitution of 1965." An accompanying letter dated Oct. 10 said it was being sent for information to the ambassador in Rome from the Niger foreign ministry. According to the MOU, the 500 tons of uranium was to be "shipped secretrly by sea" on a Gabon-flagged ship, and, at some point in "international waters," the 500-tons of uranium was to be transferred from the Gabon-flagged vessel to another ship. This was seen by experts to be a total technical impossibility, but few besides experts paid any attention to the absurdity. The yellow cake was to be shipped Aug. 28 and arrive on Sept. 11. (What a coincidence!) An accompanying letter said, "...very good work done together with the personal emmissary of the Iraqi president," (sic) adding that "It's understood that this information is top secret." In spite of this warning, the letter itself was stamped only "Confidential," one of the lowest orders of classification.

But in the package of documents forwarded to SISMI were many signs of fabrication. For example, a letter dated July 30,1999 actually refers in the past tense to supposed deals agreed to in Niamey a year later, June 29, 2000. And the October 10 letter had a heading, "Conseil Militaire Supreme," an organization that went out of existence May 1989. The signature was that of minister of foreign affairs Allele Habibou, who had been out of office for a decade. Finally, while the letter was dated October 10, it was stamped as having been received in Rome on Sept. 28 two weeks before it was sent. In addition, the Niger constitution of 1965, referred to in one document, had been superceded by a new constitution of Aug 9, 1999, and the presidential signature bore no resemblance to the real signature of Mamadou. The forger also used an inaccurate representation of the Niger national emblem. The Sept. 3, 2001 document attempting to show a connection to the attacks appears indentical to the document outlling the ambassador's previous 1999 trip -- the same flight and time. The only changes had been made to the top of the page. Also, by September 4, 2001, al Zahawiah was no longer ambassador, another slight problem.

FINAL ABSURDITY
The argument over the validity of the allegations was a total waste of time. A former senior State Department official told this reporter: "If Iraq had had the yellow cake in question, it would not have advanced its ability to develop a nuclear weapon because Iraq lacked the complex industrial capacity required to refine yellow cake into anything usable in that respect. In fact, in 1991 Iraq already had several hundred tons of yellow cake purchased in two deals with Niger in the early 1980's that were deemed of so little value by the IAEA that they were never removed as part of the UNSCOM disarmament effort because it was of so little significance. In fact, in the weeks after the fall of Baghdad, looters removed some of the yellow cake from its sealed drums to use the drums as containers for other materials. "All along, since early 2003, I've wondered why virtually no-one said `so what?'" in reaction to the nuclear aspect of this entire affair."

WE MAKE GET AN ANSWER
The Special Prosecutor in the CIA leak case is known to be in possession of the Italian parliamentary report, and so the full FBI field investigation of the matter. Federal law enforcdment officials told this reporter that pursing the career of the forgeries was one reason Patrick Fitzgerald asked for and obtained additional authority to broaden his probe in Feburary of 2004.

Originally posted to dkmin on Wed Oct 26, 2005 at 11:22 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  formatting (none)
    is your friend, friend.

    very interesting stuff, just not all that easy to read.

    "after the Rapture, we get all their shit"

    check out Daily Gotham, yo!

    by lipris on Wed Oct 26, 2005 at 11:21:51 AM PDT

  •  It seems that Richard Sale is now a (none)
    former UPI correspondent and this is posted on Pat Lang's blogged, not published as an UPI article.  Just thought that should be noted.

    I know that's how Sale posted it, but can you edit the diary and drop in some paragraph breaks -I'm struggling to read it.  

    Thanks

  •  Broken into arbitrary paragraphs (none)
    THE NIGER FORGERIES

    How Did Allegations from Discredited Documents End Up in a State of the Union Speech? By Richard Sale, Intelligence Correspondent

    DOUG FEITH'S BACKCHANNEL

    In December 2001, there was a secret meeting in Rome attended by MICHAEL LEDEEN, a paid consultant to Panorama, the Italian magazine that first broke the story of the Niger documents, Defense Department official, LARRY FRANKLN, since indicted for passing classified information to Israel, the classified documents outlining US policy towards Iran and U.S activities in Iraq. HAROLD RHODE, another DOD official was there, and, like FRANKLIN, was from the office of DOUG FEITH Undersecretary of Defense for Policy.

    Also attending was Iran-Contra figure MANUCHER GHORBANIFAR, an Iranian fabricator of inteliligence about whom the CIA had issued a "burn notice" that the man and his information were not reliable and to avoid employing him. According to former and serving U.S. intelligence sources the secret meetings between Pentagon officials and associates of Ghorbanifar in Europe had been going on for almost two years, a full year longer than the Bush administration acknowledged.

    Ghorbanifar told Laura Rozen of the Washington Monthly of three meetings, but U.S. inteligence officials have confirmed to this reporter that while the Pentagon originally told the Washington Post that Rhode had simply run into Ghorbanifar in Paris in June 2003, Ghorbanifar told Rozen that the two men spent weeks planning the meeting. Further, U.S. intellligence officials said that the Italian military intelligence organization, SISMI, provided logistics and security for the December 2001 Rome meeting.

    In fact, the head of SISMI, NICOLO POLLARIi, as well as the Italian Defense Minister, ANTONIO MARTINO, attended the meeting. Martino, it should be noted, is a member of JINSA, the hardline,, right-wing pro-Israeli organization. Since Ledeen is a also member of JINSA and has often been a keynote speaker, the link is not unimportant.

    According to Rozen, who confirmed details with this reporter,Ghorbanifar told her he had had fifty meetings with Michael Ledeen since September 11th,2001 and that he had given Ledeen "4,000 to 5,000 pages of sensitive documents" concerning Iran, Iraq and the Middle East, "material no one else has received." Ghorbanifar, speaking to Rozen by telephone from France, says those meetings took place abroad because he has been refused a US visa the last two times he has applied.

    Ghorbanifar also told Rozen that he had meetings with an assortment of U.S. officials whose identities have not yet been determined. Former senior U.S. intelligence officials told this reporter that the secret meeting took place at a Sismi safe house in Rome's Piazza di Spagna. While Pollari told Rozen that Ghorbanifar was not present, U.S. intelligece officials told this reporter that he was.

    Later officials from Feith's office would claim that the Pentagon officials who attended the meeting did not know in advance that Ghorbanifar was going to be there and were surprised by his presence). Here are some excerpts of Rozen's interview with Pollari:

    Pollari: "It's true, we organized the meeting in Rome with the Iranians, but Ghorbanifar wasn't there. We didn't know these Iranians. One of them even asked us how to write his name. Anyway, the meeting. This is how it went. A minister calls me up. Who? No names. He tells me that the Pentagon wants to organize a meeting with some Iranians. They've got some information about matters concerning our national security. So I get to work. I keep an eye on things through two of my men. But all they talk about is tripe. But above all, oil contracts.

    ENI [Italian State Petroleum]. Concessions for new exploitation. Lines of credit for tens of millions of dollars ... As if the Sismi is some sort of hawkers' mart where you buy and sell. I decide to alert the government. I spell out my misgivings about our institutional role ... I want to avoid any future misunderstandings..."

    THE WILSON MISSION

    The Plame controversy began when Vice President Dick Cheney learned from a CIA briefer about the Niger documents and demanded to know more about the Niger Embassy break-in of Jan. 2 2001 during which the documents had been seized. The briefer went back to the agency and there was a meeting at the CIA of the Counterproliferation division, VALERIE PLAME, the wife of former diplomat JOE WILSON, in attendance, Plame was approached by a senior agency offical and asked if her husband would be willing to investigate allegations made in the Niger documents that Saddam Huseein was attempting to purchase 500 tones of yellow cake uranium. The CIA official thought iWilson a good choice to send to Niger since he was a former Ambassador to Gabon and a U.S. Embassy official in Iraq during Gulf War.

    In any case, It was Plame's boss and other senior agency Counterproliferatoin officials who okayed the trip, putting Wilson on a a per diem. In a June 10, memo written by the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research, a five-page long classified memo was sent to Marc Grossman. In it was a line (one line) referring in passing to the Wilson mission, mentioning "a CIA meeting apparently convened by Valier Wilson." This was in error.

    But no one asked for a correction because no one at the time ever thought that Plame's name would be leaked and also because the document was classified. Wilson met in Niger in Niamy with Ambassador Owens-Kirkpatrick and a 3-star Army Gen. Fulfer from a senior commander of Eurcom. Fulfer came to believe the Niger story to be horseshit just as Wilson did. Wilson returned to Washington in early March and met with various people in the agency and intelligence community including the State Department's African Affairs Bureau to report on is findings.

    On March 9, CIA cabled Wilson's doubts to the intel community and passed a memo with his comments to White House, according to former senior CIA officials But the chief point is that Plame did not have the authority to initiate any mission regarding the Niger charges. She was, after all, under cover, and her identity was classified. On July 7, the INR memo was readdressed to Coliin Powell.

    But the first version, five pages and classified, was sent to White House communications and forwarded to Air Force One where it was received by Ari Fleisher. The special prosecutor has subpoened the Air Force One phone records.

    THE BREAK IN

    The Niger Embassy in Rome had, for decades, been a target for SISMI (Italian Military intelligence) eavewsdroppers. The Niger Embassy was broken into on Jan. 2, 2001. The place had been trashed and ransacked and Aarfou Mounkaila, the second secretry, reported the crime to the carabinieri.

    However, very little was stolen except a Breil steel watch and three small vials of perfume. What was missing was documents. The agents at SISMI would receive a thick packet of documents in exchange for cash. The documents included a codebook, a series of letters laying the groundwork for a 1999 visit to Niger by Wassam al-Zahawiah, Iraq's Ambassador to the Holy See, and few telexes, one with the heading "003/99/ABNI/Rome."  

    None of this would appear to be very siinister except, one -- the intelligence contained in the documents had been fabricated and found to be false and two -- Michael Ledeen, a prominent neocon, was at the time, a "paid consultant" to SISMI," according to former very senior U.S. intelliegence officials. His ties dated back to the 1980s.

    The Italian Parliamentry Committe for intelligence oversight, which is a single committee made up of reps from the Italian Senate and Chamber of deputies, did an investigation. They quickly determined that the data was forged, and, not in Italy but in the United States. Ledeen's name surfaced in the probe of the committee which was trying to determine what role he had played, if any.

    Nevertheless, SISMI, whose headquarters are at Forte Braschi, had already acted. Its liason had forwarded the details of the supposed sale of Niger yellow cake to Iraq to Britain's MI-6 and, following a number of meetings in Rome MI-6 passed on a summary of the information to the US labeled "reliable." The summary sent to the British was called, "Recriprocal Exchange of Information." SISMI did not in any way reveal how it had obtained the information to protect sources and methods.

    MI-6 forwarded the summary to the CIA where it was not given much notice. It was seen as third-hand uncorroborated information. For example, it was not included in the President's Daily Brief (PDF.) SISMI also sent copies of the data to Ita'y's Executive Committe of the Intelligence and Security Service ((CESIS) and sent a copy to the Italian Foreign Ministry and Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi.

    The African Directorates in the Foreign Ministry was quick to raise "strong objections" and "reservations" about the accuracy of the information forwarded to MI-6 and the CIA. State"s INR was quick to brand the intelligence as "junk." "A whole lot of things told us that the stuff was junk," a former INR official told this reporter.

    Among the tell-tale signs of fraud:: the centerpiece of the documents was a three-page memorandum of understanding (MOU) between Iraq and Niger dated July 6, 2000. It was signed by Niger President Tandja Mamadou and Allele Habibou, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation, and it spoke of a bilatersal deal for five hundred tons of uranium oxide which was "legal and authorized under the Niger constitution of 1965."

    An accompanying letter dated Oct. 10 said it was being sent for information to the ambassador in Rome from the Niger foreign ministry. According to the MOU, the 500 tons of uranium was to be "shipped secretrly by sea" on a Gabon-flagged ship, and, at some point in "international waters," the 500-tons of uranium was to be transferred from the Gabon-flagged vessel to another ship. This was seen by experts to be a total technical impossibility, but few besides experts paid any attention to the absurdity. The yellow cake was to be shipped Aug. 28 and arrive on Sept. 11. (What a coincidence!)

    An accompanying letter said, "...very good work done together with the personal emmissary of the Iraqi president," (sic) adding that "It's understood that this information is top secret." In spite of this warning, the letter itself was stamped only "Confidential," one of the lowest orders of classification.

    But in the package of documents forwarded to SISMI were many signs of fabrication. For example, a letter dated July 30,1999 actually refers in the past tense to supposed deals agreed to in Niamey a year later, June 29, 2000. And the October 10 letter had a heading, "Conseil Militaire Supreme," an organization that went out of existence May 1989. The signature was that of minister of foreign affairs Allele Habibou, who had been out of office for a decade.

    Finally, while the letter was dated October 10, it was stamped as having been received in Rome on Sept. 28 two weeks before it was sent. In addition, the Niger constitution of 1965, referred to in one document, had been superceded by a new constitution of Aug 9, 1999, and the presidential signature bore no resemblance to the real signature of Mamadou. The forger also used an inaccurate representation of the Niger national emblem.

    The Sept. 3, 2001 document attempting to show a connection to the attacks appears indentical to the document outlling the ambassador's previous 1999 trip -- the same flight and time. The only changes had been made to the top of the page. Also, by September 4, 2001, al Zahawiah was no longer ambassador, another slight problem.

    FINAL ABSURDITY

    The argument over the validity of the allegations was a total waste of time. A former senior State Department official told this reporter: "If Iraq had had the yellow cake in question, it would not have advanced its ability to develop a nuclear weapon because Iraq lacked the complex industrial capacity required to refine yellow cake into anything usable in that respect.

    In fact, in 1991 Iraq already had several hundred tons of yellow cake purchased in two deals with Niger in the early 1980's that were deemed of so little value by the IAEA that they were never removed as part of the UNSCOM disarmament effort because it was of so little significance.

    In fact, in the weeks after the fall of Baghdad, looters removed some of the yellow cake from its sealed drums to use the drums as containers for other materials. "All along, since early 2003, I've wondered why virtually no-one said `so what?'" in reaction to the nuclear aspect of this entire affair."

    WE MAKE GET AN ANSWER

    The Special Prosecutor in the CIA leak case is known to be in possession of the Italian parliamentary report, and so the full FBI field investigation of the matter. Federal law enforcdment officials told this reporter that pursing the career of the forgeries was one reason Patrick Fitzgerald asked for and obtained additional authority to broaden his probe in Feburary of 2004.

    "I just had the basic view of the American public -- it can't be that bad out there." Marine Travis Williams after 11 members of his squad were killed.

    by Steven D on Wed Oct 26, 2005 at 11:43:45 AM PDT

  •  Thank you for the diary. (none)
    I am hoping that Fitzgerald gets all of these characters.  They have acted like the foreign policy of the US government was some kind of computer game for the last five and a half years.  It is really frightening to see where this President who is criminally incompetent and the criminal VP cabal has taken our country.  Ten years ago I would never have believed that any individual president, no matter how incompetent, could have changed the country and our place in the world so dramatically.  It is shocking.  The corruption of this administration is dramatically more dangerous than Watergate.  Our country is precious and a criminal President can do irreparable damage to it.  If this corruption had not been uncovered, it is entirely possible that our country would not have survived another three years.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site