Daily Kos

Begala on Indictments: Bush's False Moral Superiority

Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 12:25:57 PM PDT

Paul Begala speaks out again on the PlameGate investigation and inditements on the Huffington Post, and points out that this investigation is showing just how hollow Bush's Claims of moral superiority have clearly become:

It is not boilerplate to state that those accused are entitled to the presumption of innocence. But that is a legal matter. As a matter of morality, the Bushies are already guilty. Guilty of smearing the Wilson family. Guilty of twisting intelligence. Guilty of lying about the role of White House aides in outing Mrs. Wilson. Guilty of sanctimony and hypocrisy and hubris. Most of all, they are guilty of misleading us into this God-awful war.

More after the flip...  

Paul Begala, and probably many of the Clinton administration have probably had to face significant criticisms of their place in the Clinton White House due to the swirling of scandal.  This issue was played upon and exaggerated by the bush administration:

And yet George W. Bush campaigned on a pledge to "restore honor and decency to the Oval Office." He spoke of moms and dads on the campaign trail who showed him photos of their children and asked him to give them a president their kids could be proud of.

We all knew what he meant. With a wink and a nod he told us he wouldn't cheat on Laura. And after he took office Mr. Bush and his henchmen smeared the Clintonistas, falsely accusing them of vandalism and theft. They told the press that in this Oval Office the gentlemen would wear suits, the ladies, skirts. And no more paper coffee cups. Nothing but the finest bone china.

However, the Fitzgerald investigation is showing the lie to that premise on the first try - with the Clinton Whitehouse there were years of scandals, with now inditements of senior staff.  With the Bush White House, the first investigation leads to inditements - don't have to scratch very hard to find the rot:

The Fitzgerald probe, it should be noted, is the first independent investigation into alleged wrongdoing in the Bush White House. And it has hit paydirt. Contrast that with the dry holes of Whitewater, Filegate, the billing records, Vince Foster's suicide, the cattle futures, the Buddhist temple, and all the rest. Good Lord, Congress even spent two years investigating Clinton's Christmas card list. Just to list the trumped-up Clinton "scandals" is to recall how trivial -- and yet how destructive -- they were. Innocent people were impoverished, reputations were damaged, careers derailed. But at least history can give the Clinton team a clean bill of ethical health. No White House was more thoroughly investigated -- and more thoroughly exonerated. But it's telling that the first time anyone had the courage to scratch the surface of Bush, Inc., he found corruption.

I definitely get the sense that there is a sense of vindication for Paul Begala in this indictments.  As he points out, not schadenfreude, but rather the sense that he and his own had been unfaired maligned, and now the nation was starting to see the truth.

From:

In the first year of George W. Bush's presidency, one major media figure told my wife and me to our faces that the difference between the Clinton crowd and the Bush team was that, "They're just better people than you are. They're more loyal to their President, more patriotic, less self-interested and ambitious. They're just better people."

To:
As a matter of morality, the Bushies are already guilty. Guilty of smearing the Wilson family. Guilty of twisting intelligence. Guilty of lying about the role of White House aides in outing Mrs. Wilson. Guilty of sanctimony and hypocrisy and hubris. Most of all, they are guilty of misleading us into this God-awful war.

Vindication sure sounds sweet.  Thank you again to Mr. Begala for providing a more personal perspective.

Tags: Paul Begala, Valerie Plame, PlameGate, Scooter Libby, George W. Bush (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 9 comments

  •  Not a Paul Begala Expert (4.00 / 2)

    But his columns keep speaking to me and providing a more personal perspective on this whole process.  Hope other people agree.

    Leftie (-6.88), Libertarian(-6.46) - Dalai Lama is closest to *my* ideal

    by brandido on Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 12:25:21 PM PDT

  •  Indictments (spelling) (none / 1)

    Good post by Begala, but unfortunately one that too few Democrats in office ever mention.

    Where are our Democratic Leaders?  Mostly silent.

    "I just had the basic view of the American public -- it can't be that bad out there." Marine Travis Williams after 11 members of his squad were killed.

    by Steven D on Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 12:25:47 PM PDT

    •  Thanks (none / 0)

      Fixed spelling - always get those two mixed up :(

      Leftie (-6.88), Libertarian(-6.46) - Dalai Lama is closest to *my* ideal

      by brandido on Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 12:32:22 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Fellow Democrat butt-kicker here... (none / 0)

      To be fair, Reid did release a pretty strong statement that is on the front page.
    •  Silent? (none / 0)

      Where are our Democratic Leaders?  Mostly silent.

      That's just not even a factual statement. Just because it's not reported widely on DKos, it doesn't mean that it's not being reported at all. It's not like I even had to look hard for these either...

      Democrats Say Problems at White House Go Beyond Libby A NYT article which got fairly prominent placement on the NYT homepage.

      "These are very serious charges," said Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Senate minority leader. "They suggest that a senior White House aide put politics ahead of our national security and the rule of law."

      [...]

      "There is a level of corruption here that seems to ignore these questions about national security in a very dangerous way," said Senator Byron L. Dorgan, Democrat of North Dakota. "This is an issue that potentially endangers our national security."

      [...]

      "This case is bigger than the leak of highly classified information," Mr. Reid said. "It is about how the Bush White House manufactured and manipulated intelligence in order to bolster its case for the war in Iraq and to discredit anyone who dared to challenge the president."

      Representative John Conyers Jr. of Michigan, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, echoing the Watergate scandal of three decades ago, said, "The charges really beg the larger question - what did the president and vice president know about these and related matters, and when did they know it?"

      [...]

      Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts, the president's rival in the 2004 elections, said the indictment provided "evidence of White House corruption at the very highest levels."

      He added: "A chief architect of the war in Iraq, Scooter Libby, sworn to protect this country, used access to national security information not as weapons against our nation's enemies, but as weapons against someone who dared to ask tough questions of a dishonest policy. Then they tried to cover it up."


      Ding, ding, ding!

      A few days ago the Hill reported that the Dems were ready to go with a response to indictments. They've successfully hit on the national security angle and culture of corruption.  

      More:

      Are we so lazy these days to assume that everything a Dem says makes it to DKos?  If anything, the stuff that gets people angry gets attention in the diaries.  Google news is helpful, as is simply checking some major media sites every once in awhile. Reid's strong statement got quoted in multiple wire stories on this.

      "The way the loser loses will determine whether the winner wins in November." -- Rahm Emanuel

      by Newsie8200 on Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 08:41:51 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Great diary - fix title, please? (none / 1)

    It's "indictments." It also appears one or two times in your story text. Thanks for great link!

    John McCain supports Bush's Iraq policy

    by Alna Dem on Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 12:29:43 PM PDT

  •  Jesus, Mary, and Joseph (none / 0)

    In the first year of George W. Bush's presidency, one major media figure told my wife and me to our faces that the difference between the Clinton crowd and the Bush team was that, "They're just better people than you are. They're more loyal to their President, more patriotic, less self-interested and ambitious. They're just better people."

    If it was a non-Faux person saying that, the media is officially irredeemable.

    "Conservative principles" are marketing props used by the Conservative Movement to achieve political power, not actual beliefs. -Glenn Greenwald

    by latts on Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 01:32:53 PM PDT

Permalink | 9 comments