If so, what's your opinion of it and is the book significant whatsoever??
I stopped by Borders last evening and read the preface, first chapter and half of the second chapter. Dean's assertion that Bush is worse than Nixon is interesting, but I was a little disappointed because as I went into the second chapter and browsed the next few chapters I noticed that Dean spent a lot of time discussing W and Cheney's secretive backgrounds prior to 2000.
Perhaps I've read too many Bush books and since I was quite familar w/ the info Dean presented in re: to Bush and Cheney's background, I didn't think he was adding much, rather just copy and pasting from recent books. Guess I wanted more meat and potatoes early on and something very fresh. However, I am interested in reading further and seeing why Dean thinks Bush is a dirtier campaigner than Nixon and how he has abused Executive power worse than Nixon.
Anyway, just wanted to see if I could get some discussion started on Dean's book and the Nixon/Bush comparison. :)