"Real Time" Threat - Beware of (m)Ann Coulter

Uh oh....it's time for Real Time.  And guess who's on right now.  Yep, that's right, the wonderfully evil Ann Coulter.  And she just claimed that the media demonized blacks and invented all the supposed atrocities attributed during the Katrina aftermath so the Democrats could stomp on Bush.

Anyone watching, pop in with your own comments.  I'm TiVoing it right now, so I can analyze and deconstruct further...but for now, I'm reduced to flipping the bird and shouting 'Fuck You Bitch!' at her image.

•  Ick

  I had to stop watching, when she started going off about Liberals being the ones who are demanding the aborting of blacks in order to reduce crime.  This was in defense of Bill Bennett.

  How can anyone take this person seriously?  She's a parody of a parody.

  by GOPhuckYourself on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:19:20 PM PDT

  •  I have basic cable, here in Philadelphia

    One of the channels is some non-profit PA channel and from time to time, Democracy Now! is on it, as are other political folks, and recently they aired this hour long segment of Ann The Man talking to whomever would listen.

    Trouble was...instead of at least make points (wrong or right), every other phrase out of her mouth was an attempt at being cutesy and a comedian.

    And she's not one. She's not funny, she doesn't practice what she preaches, she complains that everyone else is a hate-monger, but she turns around and that's all she does!.

    I wish someone could just shut her the fuck up.

    by Stand Strong on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:23:33 PM PDT

  •  How?

    Because there are some whacked people out there.  And there are people who continue to claim that Democrats and Liberals are the racists because somehow welfare keeps the black man from reaching their real potential.  Since we all know just throwing the Black pop. into the deep end means they'll all find a way to float and become just like the rich white folks.

    And, of course, there's the fact that Ann continues to misrepresent the whole thing about the 'Abortion for lower crime rates' arguement (the fact that many unwanted kids, who are ether pawned off for adoption, or raised by a parent/parents who see them not as a gift, but a burden, will more likely turn to crime because of that upbringing) only makes me seethe more.

    by Kryptik on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:35:38 PM PDT

•  Kryptik, there's hope my friend...

  It's on the nuz. It must be true:

  Today on EWM: Scientific Shocker: Study: Euthanizing Right-wing Pundits would Solve Global Warming

  by The Eyewitness Muse on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:28:17 PM PDT

  •  I didn't even read the piece

    But the title made me laugh out loud!

    by rdldot on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:40:08 PM PDT

•  Noted Transexual Plagerist Ann Coulter...

  Sorry, I had to say that...  Anyway, please tell me she's not a panelist!!!  Please tell me Bill kept her away on Satellite??

  by RobNYC on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:32:04 PM PDT

  •  Thankfully...

    I think Bill knows well enough that perhaps he's the only one in that room that could stomach Ann for that long.

    by Kryptik on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:36:23 PM PDT

    •  Don't start watching until 18 min in

      The monologue was pretty short and lame and I turned it off as soon as I say her satellite face.  Kept checking in until she was gone.  18 minutes after the hour.  

      Those on the west coast feed spare yourself.

      by Ted Hitler on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:00:22 PM PDT

  •  Bill and Ann are friends

    For some strange unfathomable reason. He talked about it on an interview transcribed here.

    by chantedor on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:40:35 PM PDT

    •  I get it.

      I have a guy I would sometimes count as a friend who has an insanely Randian viewpoint about life. We agree on some things for entirely different reasons (for example, he's pro-choice even though he does believe abortion is the taking of a human life). We agreed on the Iraq war being a bad idea not so much because of moral reasons but because of its inevitable failure and the possibility of exposing how weak our military really was in situations inappropriate to the use of nukes (although he did think I was crazy when I said Hussein had no WMD).  We disagree, obviously, on a lot. But we can talk. Or at least we could. It has gotten harder and harder only because the environment has become so toxic.

      by Magenta on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:49:55 PM PDT

  •  Why did you you have to include...

    ...the transexual part?  Was it really necessary?  Or was it just a little attempt at humor, because, you know, transsexual people are funny?  [Note the correct spelling.]

    As an actual transsexual person, I am quite offended by the title of the diary and by your comment.

    How do you respond?

    Robyn

    by rserven on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:48:27 PM PDT

    •  Like this...

      I don't think there's anything wrong with it but you know Ann Coulter would, thereby calling her one.  It'd be like calling her a liberal.

      by RobNYC on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:01:32 PM PDT

      •  She actually said liberals say terrible things

        about blacks to hurt Bush.  And of course, the media was the liberal voice.

        And her party would never say anything like that.  

        I can't comprehend not having any ability to be objective.  But she doesn't.  It's hate all the way.  

        by 2lucky on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:07:13 PM PDT

      •  It still offends us.

        Can't you see how using the word "transsexual" as a term of derision would be offensive to us?  Or do we just not matter, because attempted snark trumps civility?

        Robyn
        

        by rserven on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:15:35 PM PDT

        •  I can see how you are offended by this

          As a recovering alcoholic myself (and damned proud of the "recovering part" of that term, I suppose I could take umbrage at some of the things that are said about Bush's presumptive falling off of the wagon. Truth be told, they don't particularly bother me that much - not even the uninformed and unfair stereotypes of recovering alcoholics. Christ, sometimes I forget myself and call the fucker a goddamn drunk too, which is something I have known to do IRL when in the toils of road rage.

          by gp39m on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:23:06 PM PDT

          •  Since i'm offending people anyway...

            Isn't Bush technically what's being called a "dry drunk?"  You can't really put the "recovering" part if you were to label him an alcoholic since he never went for treatment.  The only comments about him drinking that i've heard have seen to be stereotypes of someone who never actually went through recovery.

            by RobNYC on Sat Oct 08, 2005 at 05:46:56 AM PDT

        •  but, you knew that goin' in.

          you knew that before the nip tuck. you knew the jokes you heard before the nip tuck would still be heard long after the nip tuck, so...
          why the tears? maybe the jokes don't get any easier to listen to. but, sorry, it's funny stuff! whether gay, straight or trans, jokes about the pee pee are generally met with a big laugh. we love our pee pee jokes. it ain't about "pc" or "tolerance" or any of that bullshit. it's just plain funny. especially when the target is a faux offended conservative boitch who could use a good old fashioned gang bang to change her 'tood some.

          by winkler on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 10:00:44 PM PDT

          •  I do agree

            We are becoming a little too PC. Especially when people get upset about name calling someone what they actually are. If I called her a lesbian or a homosexual would the gays gang up on me. (hey some of em might like that <BIG GRIN>) People need to use common sense before they get their panties in a bunch.

            by BryanLVPA on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 10:05:32 PM PDT

            •  Its not about being PC!!

              This discussion is about as far away from the point as it could get...

              The point is not that someone was making fun of her because she is a transsexual and transsexuals are "bad,"  its that they were making fun of her because she looks like an ugly, ugly, man.

              The transsexual comment had nothing to do with this person's opinions of transsexuals, but rather of Ann Coulter, who obviously is trying to put forth the image of an attractive female, when really she's quite ugly.  Its not that all transsexuals are ugly, but merely that Ms. Coulter fails miserably at even the most basic and superficial attempts at personality.

              
              My Column

              by MadCasey on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 10:41:23 PM PDT

              •  exactly

                "who obviously is trying to put forth the image of an attractive female, when really she's quite ugly"

                Beyond all the tranny stuff, that's the real point.

                I've seen people on here say that insulting her looks is no better than righties insult Michael Moore for being fat, but it's different because he doesn't go around portraying himself as some kind of male model, nor should he.

                by BlueEngineerInOhio on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 11:20:21 PM PDT

                •  Yes Thank you

                  That was my point.  I'm not trying to offend anyone and again, I don't think there's anything wrong with being a transsexual.  I saw it because we all know Ann Coulter would find something wrong with it.  And the fact that she does sort of talk with a masculine voice and does look somewhat like a drag-queen.  I could call her a liar but let's be honest, I doubt that would bother her.

                  The whole "she's a man" thing has been going around as a joke and we all know that she would find it bad to be called a transsexual.  I honestly think she'd be just as offended if you called her a liberal too.

                  by RobNYC on Sat Oct 08, 2005 at 05:43:40 AM PDT

                  •  In that case...

                    ...call her a liberal.  

                    The thing here is that you are being told that it is offensive to use transsexual or tranny as a put-down.  Apparently you have some supporters up above who think this sort of sophomoric dsiplay okay.  Perhaps they also think it's funny to put someone down because they are a jew or a wetback or a chink or a raghead...the list goes on and on...or, of course, gay.  Or a nigger.  No difference, once you have been asked to stop and you refuse to even consider it.

                    Mr. winkler above (and of course it's "mr", women don't behave this way) thinks it's okay because "I asked for it."  You see, in his worldview, transsexual people have no right to be happy.  Throwing words at them is okay, but he'd really much rather be throwing rocks if he could get away with it.  Sadly, in many places, he could.

                    And I'm not "crying" over this.  This is a teaching/learning moment (what can I say, I'm a college professor).  I learned long ago, however, that some people don't want to learn and I can't make them.  All I can do is offer the education.  It's up tp you and yours whether you wish to accept it or to remain ignorant.

                    Robyn

                    by rserven on Sat Oct 08, 2005 at 07:14:53 AM PDT

                    •  whatever...

                      you chose the nip tuck, and that's fine. i couldn't care less. i know of and have met two peeps that almost went thru with the nip tuck until it became time to doc the dick. reformed sniper and all that. but, for whatever reasons didn't bother to finish the job. and they BOTH live here in this one horse town of mine!! so, i know it ain't a rare operation.
                      but, it's STILL funny. and snarking (m)Ann Coulter with it is damn fun! so...
                      "the winkler called today, he came here this morning. with 400 pounds and a photograph... "
                      yes, male. hope you're feeling much better after the nip tuck. truly.

                      by winkler on Sat Oct 08, 2005 at 05:16:32 PM PDT

        •  There's nothing wrong with being a transsexual

          But you have to admit, Ann Coulter does look like a man trying to be a woman.

          by ThatsNotFunny on Sat Oct 08, 2005 at 07:18:02 AM PDT

          •  I don't have to admit that.

            I don't know what she looks like.  I don't watch Ann Coulter and read anything that she writes.  I am amazed that there are people, "liberal" people, who do.

            Attacking a human being, not for what they say, but for what they look like is disgusting behavior.  It's the worst sort of ad hominem attack I can imagine.

            When I came out, I looked, in your words, "like a man trying to be a woman."  So fucking what?  If you were there, would you have been one of the men who tried to assault me?  Or maybe you would have been the neighbor who slit the tires on my car, or the one who put dog shit in my mailbox.  Or maybe just the one who shot my cat.  

            Does anyone ever just stop and think, "God, I wonder what it's like to be someone like her?"  Is it that much easier just to go along with the crowd?  

            Are people here even sentient?  I thought people were here at DKos because they were at least thoughtful and that they cared about humanity.  Well, you can't care about humanity if some people are excluded from the caring.  That's what the fucking republicans do, fellas!  Is it your goal in life to be like them?

            On the off-chance, the bizarro-chance, that someone here is remotely close to wanting to learn something, I present my diary from yesterday, Learning to Count Past Two.  It's long, as long as it needs to be.  I would surely hope that it's not too long for anyone's attention span.  It's got difficult concepts to consider.  But that should be why people get educated, not just so they can get a job.

            by rserven on Sat Oct 08, 2005 at 08:09:43 AM PDT

            •  I agree, so ducking what.

              I'm not attacking her, I'm not saying that a man trying to be like a woman is bad. You are the one attaching bad connotation to my words.

              I simply said she looks like a man trying to be a woman. It is an observation, not an insult.

              As they say in Stripes, "Lighten up, Francis."

              by ThatsNotFunny on Sat Oct 08, 2005 at 03:44:03 PM PDT

    •  I also object

      Snark is primate-politics, the chimpanzee sneer that is no different than the Bush Smirk.  

      And dragging peoples' sexuality & gender into it, except in cases of overt hypocrisy such as closet-cases working against gay rights, is just pandering to the predominant bigotries, no differently than Dobson.

      So yeah, clean it up.  Coulter's sexuality and gender identity and medical history have exactly zero relevance to what we think about her positions on this or that issue.

      by G2geek on Sat Oct 08, 2005 at 03:13:48 AM PDT

  •  Hey, that statement is from .

    the Stephanie Miller Radio Show. That is the term she uses to mock and call out Coulter. I enjoy her show, sometimes she is a little too light weight with her knowledge but, she has a sense of humor and shows how trolls like Coulter, O'Reilly and Hannity are a "bunch of lying crap".

    by alnc on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 11:10:03 PM PDT

    •  Offensive language...

      ...offered by someone who is only repeating what they heard elsewhere is still offensive.  It might have been funny once, but the likelihood that is funny when it is repeated is much lower.  Eventually it's just vile.

      Robyn

      by rserven on Sat Oct 08, 2005 at 07:21:01 AM PDT

•  I think if we ever get the chance, we should force

  ... her to eat an entire large order of chicken wings and crinkle cut fries.

  by Bob Johnson on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:34:03 PM PDT

  •  And ribs and don't forget

    the collard greens.

    by jorndorff on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:07:05 PM PDT

•  Oh my God

  Sully seems to be having a conversion experience. He's on the panel. No longer trusts W and decrying torture. How long will the conversion experience last?
  

  by RevDeb on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:41:35 PM PDT

  •  It's A Miracle!!

    But seriously, it's amazing that he laid out what many conservatives seem to miss:  What Saddam did, and what terrorists do should NOT reflect on our own tactics.  We should not compare ourselves to THEIR standards.

    That Saddam tortured his own people should NOT be justification for torturing Saddam's (former) people.

    by Kryptik on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:43:54 PM PDT

  •  ummm..

    sullivan has always been critical of bush.... for a least a couple of years. he voted for him in 2000 and supported the war, but hes always been critical of the post-iraq planning, torture, and fiscal irresponsibility.

    by zeke in oh on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:47:35 PM PDT

    •  Bush, maybe....

      But aside from that, he's held the conservative party line fairly consistantly.  Which makes his rebuke of the classic justification for torture all the more shocking to me.

      by Kryptik on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:53:06 PM PDT

      •  He's wavers

        He voted for Kerry I believe in 2004.  But he's too much of a toe the line in the end.  He's obviously not a huge wing-nut considering he's gay  Why he continues to sort of stand by an ideology that hates his sexuality I'll never understand but it's his right.

        by RobNYC on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:10:52 PM PDT

    •  yeah but.....

      Sully hit a new level of anger towards Bush tonight.  That anger has peaked, I mean, if it peaks any higher, I don't know what he'll do.

      I think alot of people missed it with Coulter tonight also.  I hate her guts, but it was worth seeing her tonight.  For the first time ever(that I have ever seen)she absolutely could not and would not defend Bush.  I mean, she has given up even trying.  She still said bitchy things about liberals and democrats, but it was worth it to see her squirm!

      by lrhoke on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:11:06 PM PDT

      •  I saw the show and I agree. Sully

        was all over Bushboy on everything.

        Coulter was furious with Bush.  

        Nice to see.

        by 2lucky on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:15:34 PM PDT

        •  How sweet.....

          it was!

          by lrhoke on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:18:40 PM PDT

  •  He trashed Bush on everything.

    Including Katrina response, and anger at Bush for their contempt of government and cronyism.  He was angered that the money wouldn't get to the people who had suffered.

    I was surprised at that.  

    by 2lucky on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:03:41 PM PDT

    •  I do admit

      He does at times have insightfull things to say which makes me want to shake him like a Brittish Nanny and yell at him for still being on the right.  At least move to the center!!

      He had some good things to say about the religious right too how they're cafeteria style relgion.  They pick and choose what things to follow and ignore other things like poverty, and helping those less fortunate.

      by RobNYC on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:13:49 PM PDT

      •  His response to Maher on the religion

        thing was dead-on, IMO.  Bill has a genuine intolerance for faith.  

        Listening to Sully tonight, I thought, he's a Republican?  

        I don't read his blog, so I don't know his full range of views, but he was kicking Bush's ass for all the right reasons tonight.

        by 2lucky on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:18:18 PM PDT

        •  Sully's blog....

          I check it out occasionally.  I like to read what moderate republicans are saying.  Even if I'm not likely to agree, its someone comforting to see that they aren't all neocon whackjobs.

          by lrhoke on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:22:29 PM PDT

        •  Bill on faith.....

          I would agree with Maher if he were only talking about fundies, but he lumps all Christians in together.

          I consider myself Christian, but I don't interpret the bible literally.  It doesn't matter to me if Jesus was born to a virgin or not, its his teachings that matter.

          by lrhoke on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:26:59 PM PDT

          •  Exactly, Bill always work forward

            from the worst of religion, and discounts the genuine goodwill of so many.  

            I'm no fan of organized religion (being brought up Catholic, that's not so unusual), but I would never trash someone for their faith.  

            by 2lucky on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:30:40 PM PDT

•  ETAOIN

    Listening to coulter does remind one that maybe some credence should be paid to the theory that there is a direct relationship between intellect and hair colour.

  by fadedbear on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:46:58 PM PDT

  •  hey now...

    I'm blonde...and that's not nice!

    by Elise on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:18:07 PM PDT

    •  I'm a natural "dishwater" blond and

      I'm so offended:)

      by 2lucky on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:19:22 PM PDT

      •  Lighten up

          You know full well it applies only to certain people.

          Besides I was blond myself before I turned grey.

          I looked in the mirror and the image looking back was not offended.

        It is just a way of making a point without typing a full paragraph of four letter words. (Which is of course my first inclination when it comes to coulter.) ---Lower case c is deliberate.--

        by fadedbear on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:42:54 PM PDT

        •  Jeez. I was kidding.

          I'm lightened up.  Me and my hair.

          I get your point. I was just kidding.

          No amount of blonde can explain, or excuse, Coulter.  

          by 2lucky on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:49:40 PM PDT

          •  But,

            what really perplexes me is how a society can evolve (devolve?) to the point where someone like her can be accepted into the national conversation.

              Of course if the dialog is judged by Bush's ability to communicate, I guess anything goes.

              I may not have the right to suggest this, but please elect Gore as president in '08.

            Your friends to the north will appreciate it and send you flowers and candy.

              It is a small world and we should all try to get along together.

            by fadedbear on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 10:18:45 PM PDT

            •  TV has warped us all.

              Her discourse, her demeanor wouldn't be accepted in most people's homes, except through tv.  

              I have for years changed the channel when she comes on.  She's not welcome in my home.

              And you don't have to tell us here that we need a human being as president in 08.  We know.  We know we have to get along with the rest of the world.  Not all of us Americans are crazy-mean.  We're not.

              by 2lucky on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 10:31:48 PM PDT

•  Anyone see her on O'Lielly?

  I SWEAR she had five oclock shadow, it was disturbing. And yes, she was via satellite.

  by Blakbelt on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 08:58:16 PM PDT

  •  Oh man

    She talks like a man, more so than Rita Cosby!

    by RobNYC on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:18:09 PM PDT

•  His final 'new rule' was brilliant.

  Bush: lives in a bubble...  Sock puppet... worst. president. ever...  

  by glazeone on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:00:42 PM PDT

•  How can anyone be so pretty and so deluded?

  I find myself asking that question about a lot of Repub women.

  by Christian Dem in NC on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:08:07 PM PDT

  •  pretty?

    maybe sully thinks "she"'s pretty.

    by BiminiCat on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:10:48 PM PDT

  •  ew...

    I'm sorry, but NOBODY that votes Republican is "pretty" or "hot" or any other adjective that means anything positive...these people are vampires (and they aren't the cool Anne Rice type either)!

    by Elise on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:17:34 PM PDT

•  one of the best shows ever

  mostly because salman rushdie was there just to be salman rushdie.
  

  by BiminiCat on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:10:00 PM PDT

•  Separated at Birth?

  In honor of hockey season finally starting up...

  

  by EKO on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:13:45 PM PDT

  •  it's the Adams apple

    that gives him away. They didn't give one to Eve.

    by tRueffert on Sat Oct 08, 2005 at 05:56:01 AM PDT

•  WOW!

  and here I thought I sometimes had too much a penchant for tin-foil hat wearing...great to see how nutty Ann REALLY is! And even funnier to see her expressing it on tv! This woman is batshit crazy!

  by Elise on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:16:02 PM PDT

  •  This was one of her more rational,

    pleasant appearances.  Before I got political, I turned her off because she's so hateful.  

    If you think tonight was bad, you ain't seen nuthin' yet.  She's vicious and mean.

    by 2lucky on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:22:08 PM PDT

•  Oh no....

  

  by RobNYC on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:23:54 PM PDT

•  oh the best part was the end

  of the Ann Coulter interview where he just totally, abruptly cut the segment without letting her get the last word...so satisfying!

  I like that they are friends. They are both pretty much extreme deviants on either side. I love Bill Maher and think he's really sharp, but he is extreme in his views on religion, abortion, sex, drugs and sometimes he talks crazy talk. Same thing with her, and I guess if you are on that side, she really speaks to you with her lies and distortions. Basically, I could see them doing coke together in the back of a club.

  But it's great that they are friends cause he was just so impolite to her...taking a few seconds for a hearty guffaw at her lies, putting her in check...so satisfying!

  by missreporter on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:27:32 PM PDT

•  heres the thing

  about maher and religion, hes too blind sided by his own arguments. one thing i was hoping "aflac!" and sully would hit maher on is mahers own complaints about the pot smoking community. maher often complains that the movement to legalize pot gets undercut by the idiots who show up to rallys with tye dye shirts, rose glasses and hemp shoes arguing that they want it legalized for "medicinal purposes". well you not what bill? its not just your precious pot issues where there are idiots and assholes, as "aflac!" pointed out.

  by zeke in oh on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:32:23 PM PDT

•  but

  that doesnt mean you can just paint em all that way.

  by zeke in oh on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:33:31 PM PDT

•  Making Shit Up

  The last thing that Coulter said was that there were "17 convictions" in connection with Travelgate.  An obvious lie -- the only "conviction" of anyone in the administration was, I believe, Cisneros pleading to a misdemeanor.  And there were no charges even brought re Travelgate.

  And yet, the "corrupt" Clinton administration is perpetuated in many minds (not just nuts like Coulter), because people like her get away with lies like this.

  by Upper West on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:35:49 PM PDT

•  If a nutcase bitch yaps on TV but

  nobody watches, does she actually matter at all?

  by HiD on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:50:33 PM PDT

•  thanks, I'll be sure to skip the show

  Why should I give that freak any of my attention?  

  Life's too short.

  by Nordic on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 10:01:22 PM PDT

•   Okay, Kryptik

  I'll hold her down --

  And you tie her tubes.
  

  by Pluto on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 10:10:10 PM PDT

  •  You Crazy?

    The closest I want to see her outside of a screen is from the safety of a high-powered telescope, forget getting close enough to....shudder touch her.

    by Kryptik on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 11:17:00 PM PDT

•  Coulter said "Yes"

  when asked by Maher if she was turning on Bush.

  by Andrew C White on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 10:11:10 PM PDT

  •  I think that just means

    she likes men again.

    by ThatsNotFunny on Sat Oct 08, 2005 at 07:23:17 AM PDT

•  I too think this was one of Anne's

  milder displays.  What drives me flipping crazy is her incredibly condescending annunciation patterns.  WHO THE HELL TALKS LIKE THAT?  And why would anyone aspire to such a pretentious facade.  I mean she was still batshit crazy, pulling lies out of her ass, as usual, but the intonation that this crackpot has cultivated, come on! It's almost a cross between George Plimpton and Malibu Barbie.

  by KellyB on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 10:18:28 PM PDT

•  I ask for the 1000th time, why does this woman

  get any or all this attention? Why, why, why? She is mean, evil, a liar, a troll beast, non compassionate, a Satan clone.....why?????????

  Please America shun this snake and take Michelle Malkin and Laura Ingraham down as well. God, they suck!!!!!!!!!!!

  by alnc on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 10:57:32 PM PDT