Daily Kos

Is Olbermann ready for network news? w/ poll

Thu Nov 10, 2005 at 06:46:59 AM PDT

Les Moonves, CEO of CBS, has been thinking about revamping the CBS news since the deconstruction of Dan Rather. While CBS dukes it out with ABC for #1 in primetime each week, CBS's network news ratings are consistantly last.

Moonves doesn't like 3rd place and has toyed with several different options from a multi-anchor broadcast to a bubble headed bleached blonde who comes on at five, tells you of a plane crash with a gleam in her eye. In January Moonves said:

"Those days are over when you have that guy sitting behind the desk who everyone believes to the `nth' degree," Moonves told reporters. "It's sort of an antiquated way of news telling and maybe there's a new way of doing it."
In October, Mr. Moonves brought Sean McManus (President of CBS Sports) over, to head up CBS News. What news does McManus like to watch according to Steven Battaglio of TVGuide?
TVGuide.com: What are your own news-viewing habits?
McManus: Since I had my first discussion with [CBS chairman] Leslie Moonves a month ago, I watch all three of the evening newscasts very carefully every night.... But I will almost always watch parts of Keith Olbermann's show, Countdown. I love Hardball with Chris Matthews. I watch Hannity & Colmes because of the diversity of political opinion expressed there. I will see who Larry King has on. I will always check what Greta Van Susteren has on, and if it's a story on Natalee Holloway, I immediately turn it off. I used to love Capital Report. I really enjoy watching news and the different ways they cover news events -- just as I try to watch everything that ABC Sports, NBC Sports and Fox Sports does. I'm going to watch a lot of our competition and try to learn from them.


Is the head of CBS Sports, now head of CBS news, going to have a former sportscaster, Keith Olbermann, head up the nightly news for CBS? Tim Goodman of the San Fransico Chronicle thinks Olbermann is the 'Countdown' to big change in network news. Excerpts from his Countdown article include:
And so it is that the future of broadcast network news has been hiding out, as it were, for two and half years on -- of all places -- cable. If you want to know what the face of the future looks like -- at least the successful version, not some warmed over Bob Schieffer action or a trio of Triple A prospects on "Nightline," then look no further than this man: Keith Olbermann.

Yes, that Keith Olbermann. The same man who, along with partner Dan Patrick, set a standard for anchoring a sports show on ESPN that has never -- try as ESPN does in ever-more transparently hokey ways -- been equaled. The same guy who worked for NBC and CNN and then, in various capacities, MSNBC, furiously trying in each place to unleash his personality and allow it to be accepted and appreciated.

~snip

Part Jon Stewart (the funny), Dennis Miller (the erudite and biting sub-references), H.L. Mencken (the skewering of power and stupidity in equal doses) as well as crusading journalist, Olbermann is clearly the future.

Not of cable, of course. Of broadcast network news. His show is what a modern newscast will look like to the masses. They just don't know it yet. And maybe networks won't realize this in time to adequately use him.

~snip

Oh, and by the way, Olbermann has been doing that on "Countdown" for two and a half years. Nobody knows how to make a tonal shift quite like Olbermann. One moment he's dissecting the Scooter Libby leak story with multiple sources and the next he's playing "Oddball," a quick departure from the serious to the silly. He's updating the Iraq situation or dissecting some unflattering poll numbers on President Bush, then naming that night's "Worst Person in the World" or peeking into the "Countdown" hall of fame for examples of what rapper Chuck D once called "the dumbassification of America."

Is network news ready for Olbermann? Is this a good thing for network news?  

Hat tip to TVNewser. If you aren't reading TVNewser once a day, you should be.

Poll

Is Keith Olbermann the future of network news?

67%114 votes
2%5 votes
29%50 votes

| 169 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: Keith Olbermann, MSNBC, media, CBS (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 13 comments

  •  I think the reality is (none / 1)

    that Olbermann is not completely controlled by the corporate media, since he offers some humour, he gets some freedom to report truth, not the party line all of the time.  Same with Jon Stewart.  McCain was actually afraid of Stewart's piercing questions the other night.  Corporate media would have never gotten to ask those questions of him.

    So the only way to go against the party line is with comedic sketches?  Or to have that permission because you throw in comedy which is actually more close to the truth that what MSM is actually reporting.  

    So is CBS news actually trying to figure out an acceptable way to circumvent corporate media control of the news?  

  •  Anyone who watches "Hannity and Colmes" (none / 0)

    for the diversity of opinion expressed there is highly unlikely to consider KO for a job on his news program.  He might, however, consider the Millers (Judy and Dennis) a great news team...

    When "stupidity" suffices, why search for any other reason?

    by wozzle on Thu Nov 10, 2005 at 07:04:00 AM PDT

  •  Hannity & Colmes? (none / 0)

    First of all, I cannot watch any Fox Cable News program as a matter of general principle.  News junkie that I am, if Faux is on at the gym or in an airport, I will not watch.  The only time I see bits and pieces of Faux is when I replay video clips posted on the internets of some journalistic outrage.

    So I cannot say I have watched H&C myself, and indeed, I don't even know whether its H or C whose supposed to be the "liberal."  But from what I've heard, its mostly the conservative guy ranting and humiliated the liberal guy and any unfortunate guest who dares to criticize the Shrub.  Or do I have that wrong?

    "Mom, did you hurt yourself, or are you yelling at the TV again?

    by litigatormom on Thu Nov 10, 2005 at 07:19:51 AM PDT

  •  He Doesn't Pretend (none / 0)

    To buy into spin-how could he get a network job?

    PS I've been TIVOing his show almost as long as I've had the tivo.

    Ted Hitler on bloggers: They have no credibility, all they have is facts.

    by EastFallowfield on Thu Nov 10, 2005 at 07:22:22 AM PDT

  •  a buddy who works at ABC News (none / 0)

    said that KO is known not to work too well in a "structured" environment -- meaning, the confines of network news!  So, let him stay on cable, but with better exposure....
  •  Keith is the dude (none / 0)

    He would be a terrific as a network anchor.
    His Worst in the World feature is the best.

    But I'd like Oddball shrunk down to 1.5 minutes.

    Right now, that's when we turn on mute and have our dinner.

  •  I'd rather have Keith... (4.00 / 2)

    ...stay where he can be Keith. If he got a network job, he'd just be reading the news, which would take away from what he does best - being Jon Stewart's doppleganger on the 'actual news' side of the news/comedy divide.
  •  I heart Keith (none / 0)

    Keith's rant about quitting smoking (scroll way down to "Flush the Butts") just after Peter Jennings' death was the catalyst for me quitting smoking.  I've been smoke free for 3 months now.  

    He got through to me like no one else and that is the brilliance of Keith.  He can be hardhitting and impassioned and it is real.  Not some barbie doll blabbing the news.

  •  They better not (none / 0)

    move him unless they give him more freedom.  If he gets roped into some straighjacket it will be a loss for all of us.  He is the one program I watch every night

    "Life is a tragedy for those who feel, a comedy for those who think" - Jean de la Bruyere

    by Tinuviel on Thu Nov 10, 2005 at 07:49:24 AM PDT

Permalink | 13 comments