What do you think of Prince Charles and Camilla? Would you have gone their route, or made a choice like that of Japan's Princess Sakayo? Express your views in a poll about royal infidelity.
It could happen to you, if you were royal. Cupid shoots you in the butt--or wherever those arrows fall to make a person thoroughly love struck--and you fall in love with the wrong person. By now, it's known even by us commoners. Prince Charles may have married Diana but Camilla was his love. Would he displease the royal Mum by arranging a true love match? No, he chose the sneak-around route. And the consequences showed right in his aura. Compare his relative clarity when marrying Diana to the gradual mucking up of his aura, forehead chakra and all. By 1999, the fellow was rich, was still in line to the throne. Only problem was the poor fellow's aura. If you use an aura-reading technique, at any chakra save the one appropriately known as "crown," the man was half-dead. (Basically, the crown chakra is located at the top of the head and shows if a person is, technically, still living.) Now Charles is married, at last, to his one-time mistress Camilla. The royal couple met an enthusiastic response during their recent trip to D.C. Am I the only one to be struck by the lack of collective memory? How many mentions were there in the press? No, we preferred to sing media choruses of "Isn't it wonderful?"; and "How happy they look." Personally, I'm not a fan of the "Go for it, Honey" school of marital ethics. Did Charles ever apologize publicly, even once, about lying to his wife (and the public) for more than a decade about his double-adultery of convenience? Matters of the heart and loins are complicated, to be sure. Agonies are suffered about love affairs, done and undone, and people grow as a result. Apart from some public scandal, Charles got away free with his peccadillo... except in his aura. There, for years, he lived like a frozen man, his own experiment in cryogenics. Since marriage to Camilla, and bolstered by an apparently universal public forgive-and-forget mentality, the prince's aura has thawed nicely. In every way, he looks great. Yesterday was his birthday. Charles turned a sprightly 57. He and Camilla are both in great shape, especially aurically, and it's a delight to read them now. Gone is his crooked smile of yesteryear, a delight for face readers, too. Yet if you want to see a far more glorious aura, take a peek at Japan's Princess Sakayo. Actually, the correct term now, I suppose is "ex-Princess." The only daughter of Emperor Akihito and Empress Michiko has surrendered her title, preferring to marry a commoner and keep her aura intact. She refused to pull a Charles. Why not seek out someone from a proper family, make sure he is a virgin (sooo important to Charles, once upon a time) and celebrate a lavish wedding? Why not please the royals, keep your status and money, then sneak around in the time-hallowed way of monarchs? Of course, Sakayo might not have gotten away with it. Take my poll and give your opinion why. Lucky Sakayo! She succumbed to ethics as well as love, and married her honey, whether pleasing to royalty or not. In return, the glowey young thing received a settlement of $1.3 mil. By your standards and mine, that's not bad. For Prince Charles, what a trifling amount--perhaps the cost of one of his polo ponies?
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.
You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.
Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?