Skip to main content

Remember two weeks ago, when we lobbied for passage of the Online Freedom of Speech Act; lost a tight vote in the House; and Markos was pissed at House Dems?

Guess what: House Democrats listened.  There has been a lot of interest on the Hill in finding ways to adequately protect political activity online while guarding against the possible harms of soft money, and a number of key Congresspersons and their staffs have been actively engaged in trying to work out workable legislative solutions.

I can tell you that no one has taken a greater personal interest in these issues than Rep. Brad Miller (D-NC), who today introduced H.R. 4389.  Let me walk you through what this simple bill accomplishes:

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to exempt news stories, commentaries, and editorials distributed through the Internet from treatment as expenditures or electioneering communications under such Act, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF INTERNET COMMENTARY FROM TREATMENT AS EXPENDITURE OR ELECTIONEERING COMMUNICATION.

(a) TREATMENT AS EXPENDITURE.-Section 301(9)(B)(i) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431(9)(B)(i)) is amended by inserting ''the Internet or'' after ''facilities of''.

(b) TREATMENT AS ELECTIONEERING COMMUNICATION.-Section 304(f)(3)(B)(i) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 434(f)(3)(B)(i)) is amended by inserting ''the Internet or'' after ''facilities of''.


These two clauses would codify yesterday's FEC ruling which confirmed that online media is eligible for the press exception, protecting the ability of citizens to participate in weblogs, podcasting, wikis and any other form of political news, commentary and editorial without governmental interference.  You can be an individual, a group or incorporated, and the protection is not dependent on using a "web log" but just looks at the means of transmission -- the Internet.

That was the obvious part.  But as Rep. Miller told me, he greatly admired sites like Meetup.com and other places that used online mechanisms to encourage citizens to join together in real life and work towards political goals.  So, after doing a good amount of research and thinking, he added to H.R. 4389 the following provision:

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF ORGANIZATION OF ONLINE MEETINGS AS VOLUNTEER SERVICE EXEMPT FROM TREATMENT AS CONTRIBUTION.

Section 301(8)(B)(i) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431(8)(B)(i)) is amended . . . .

(3) by adding at the end the following new clause:

"(xv) the value of services provided through the Internet in organizing and coordinating meetings of individuals to discuss a candidate or political committee, or to volunteer on behalf of a candidate or political committee, whether the person organizing and coordinating such meetings or discussions acts with or without compensation.


This provision will act to protect such sites that do not engage in news, commentary or editorial activities themselves, but are still a vital part of how citizens use the Internet to affect political affairs.  

In addition, the bill's silence on "soft money" issues would leave such details to the Federal Election Commission to resolve as part of its current rulemaking process.  As Markos, Atrios and I have said, we don't have a dog in that fight; we just want to make sure that citizen activity is protected, and that regulations focus on the candidates, parties and political committees already responsible for understanding and complying with campaign finance law.

Fellow Daily Kos diarist Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) is already co-sponsoring the bill, and I would encourage you to call your own Congresspersons to get on board as well.  For everyone who said, "No one wants to regulate bloggers -- we were just worried about [X]," H.R. 4389 provides an opportunity to follow through with that promise of support.

There will likely be other bills introduced in the coming weeks to help define how campaign finance laws should be applied to the Internet.  Some, from what I understand, may be quite comprehensive and quite good, and I will keep you updated on them.

But I really like the elegance of this bill, which basically asks the Members of Congress to agree that online news and commentary are just as worthy of protection from campaign finance law as those who practice it in print, on tv or the radio.  

People wanted a bill that protected online speech without opening up a "soft money loophole"?  Here it is.

Originally posted to Daily Kos on Fri Nov 18, 2005 at 12:51 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site