Skip to main content

Six years ago today, Washington Post reporter Katherine Boo, whose investigative piece  "Invisible Deaths: The Fatal Neglect of D.C.'s Retarded," had just run, took part in an online chat with Post readers. In March, she'd written the series "Invisible Lives: D.C.'s Troubled System for the Retarded," and it, along with her December story, would win her a Pulitzer Prize.

"When I read your article last spring, I assumed that it meant things would start to change," said one of her readers. "It is heartbreaking and shameful to read 8 months later that almost nothing has happened yet." Eight months? Try six years. Even a Pulitzer Prize has not forced change.

Last week, the Post's Karlyn Barker reported that 4 deaths had occurred just last year, citing a new quarterly review in a nearly decades-old lawsuit against DC over its "care" of developmentally disabled residents in group homes. "

That was what Boo's series had been about -- 350 "documented cases of abuse and neglect, as well as profiteering, in the city's group homes," and 116 deaths.

Wrote Barker,

The series found that none of the 116 deaths that had occurred in the homes since 1993 had been investigated.

District officials said they have since overhauled the mental retardation agency's services,... In April, the head of mental retardation services and two top aides were replaced in what officials said was a departmental restructuring aimed at speeding efforts to change.

Six years ago, Boo responded to one of her online readers:

Why didn't anything happen? that's a question I ask myself. As for Mayor Williams, he has said he will fully cooperate with the Justice Department probe. He's also said that, as
someone misdiagnosed as developmentally disabled in his early years, he's personally committed to fixing the system. We'll see what happens.

I guess six years is long enough to "see."

I keep coming back to one comment from a reader, who wrote, " Sounds like it's all about MONEY for many of these facility owners."

To which Boo responded, "Yes, I think you're talking about a time-honored tradition in programs that serve the poor."

I think about the Sex Slave Group Home in Kansas, subject of my last diary entry. It's all the same, I think. It's about money, and people who have so little power that news exposés, even those that win Pulitzer Prizes, don't end up having much effect.

Another reader wrote,

Where is the collective outrage from the " Civil Rights Community" about this National Disgrace? Your paper has aired these startling investigative details since March, and I've not seen nor heard nor read a reaction from civil rights leaders.

"That's a good question," Boo responded, "and I don't know the answer."

It is a good question, and nobody seems to know the answer.
And you gotta call neglect that ends in death "injustice." But we don't call it that. As a society, we don't. Why, I don't know. But we don't.

We have movements against the war, but nothing of that sort against the kinds of outrages committed against disabled people -- including, if not outright killing them, certainly doing nothing to stop their deaths.

The answer to why we don't, I always think, has to do with the covert nature of the evil done to disabled people. Because it appears the injuries and deaths are not the result of overt hate, people do not rise up in outrage.

Is that it? I wonder.  Whether it happens to you because of hate or because of neglect, though,  in the end you're just as dead. Dead is dead. Or are some deaths more important for us to be upset about than others?

I think we know the answer to that, and it's not a nice answer.

Where deaths can be seen to be the result of hate -- as with lynchings -- it can eventually stir people to force change.

But no one hates the poor disabled people in the group homes, right?

Originally posted to mjohnson on Tue Dec 06, 2005 at 08:23 AM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  what does it take? (none)
    are public officials ever convicted of any crimes when this sort of thing happens?

    meanwhile the president's #1 domestic priority right now is tax cuts

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site