Skip to main content

On December 7, Washington Post columnist David Ignatius astounded me once again. Here is what he wrote:

    Courage In Their Coverage
    By David Ignatius
    The Washington Post
    Wednesday, December 7, 2005; Page A25

    DUBAI -- Talking with brave Arab journalists such as Hussein Shobokshi, I hear the passion that animates good reporting everywhere. And it makes me all the more disgusted by recent revelations that my own government has been corrupting the nascent Iraqi free press by planting stories...

    ...The best of the Arab journalists are my heroes. They are risking imprisonment and death to tell the truth. At a time when U.S. media are having an identity crisis, they remind me what the news business is all about. I want to describe several of them, so readers will understand the energy they are bringing to the Arab debate.

Although he alludes to the problematic current state of the United States mainstream media, where is that column? Where is his championing of those bringing light to the failings of the U.S. media and the reasons why? Does that strike to close to the Washington Post? To Ignatius' friends and colleagues?

If foreign journalists are risking extreme hardship or even loss of life (and many indeed are), what did journalists in this country risk in presenting truth in the Iraq debate? The end of dinner party invites? Scott McClellan avoiding them in the briefing room? Professional and personal ostracizement doesn't quite equate with being behind bars or the infliction of torture.

On the even of the invasion of Iraq, President Bush held a press conference on March 6, 2003, insisting he had yet to decide to go to war. Here is Elizabeth Bumiller's (New York Times) response to the criticism that the media was too submissive:

    "I think we were very deferential, because in the East Room press conference, it's live. It's very intense. It's frightening to stand up there. I mean, think about it. You are standing up on prime time live television, asking the president of the United States a question when the country is about to go to war. There was a very serious, somber tone that evening, and I think it made -- and you know, nobody wanted to get into an argument with the president at this very serious time. It had a very heavy feeling of history to it, that press conference."

Is asking a non-deferential question 'getting into an argument'? I mean, if not then, when?

Here is veteran journalist Helen Thomas' take on the situation that day:

    "My answer to that is she is absolutely right. It is intimidating, but that's when we should have had more courage. We should have definitely asked for motives for going to war, proof of weapons, and so forth. He should not have been given a free ride, because when you are going to war -- war is killing and being killed. And if we don't have the courage to stand up and ask a question when we are so privileged, we have defaulted on our profession."

Amen

Originally posted to Cogitator on Wed Dec 14, 2005 at 01:37 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Click here for the mobile view of the site