Skip to main content

George Bush ain't even Commander-in-Chief of my ass.  

Republicans made "Commander-in-Chief" into a talking point and legal wild card the same way they did with "the events of September 11th."  This talking point engenders blind obediance.  One's immediate reaction to hearing it is designed to be, "Well, he is the guy in charge."  

Except that he's not.  

The Constitution is in charge, and ultimately we are in charge.  

The sole mention of "Commander-in-Chief" in the Constitution:

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; ...

And that's it.  The President is the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces ONLY.  It is by definition a limited power.  George Bush himself could stop you on the street and order you to drop and give him twenty, and you could merrily tell him to buzz off.  He would have no actual power to make you do it.  

The term "Commander-in-Chief" refers to ultimate civilian power over the military.  If you're not in the military, whatever the Commander-in-Chief wishes should be of no direct consequence to you.  (Indirect, sure, but that's a completely separate concept.)  Keep in mind:  the President is a civilian.  When a Bush supporter uses the term "Commander-in-Chief" to justify any power outside of Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, or National Guard activity, or to justify any power not consonant with the legal constraints within which those entities operate, that person is lying.  To the military Bush is the Commander-in-Chief.  To everyone else he is a civilian.

This is one of those "state the obvious" topics that can help everyone better understand how our government is supposed to work.  I implore Democrats everywhere to hammer away, every time the syllables "Commander-in-Chief" pass the lips of a Republican:  The President is not the Commander-in-Chief of the country, only the military.

Originally posted to Simplify on Tue Dec 20, 2005 at 01:06 AM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Did I mention "Commander-in-Chief" (4.00)
    enough times to make this its own propaganda piece?  

    Criticisim and elaboration are heartily welcome, especially with regards to constitutional interpretation.  

    Just because we can, that doesn't mean we should.

    by Simplify on Tue Dec 20, 2005 at 01:07:54 AM PST

  •  A better description of * would be (none)
    "Commodus-in Chief"  referring to a really bad Roman Emperor.
  •  Well worth stating (none)
    The Republicans are definitely using that phrase for all its worth. I'm sure Bush enjoys being refered to as such - it fits right in with his 'War President' fantasy.
  •  Flight-Suit-inChief (none)
    I prefer how Homer Simpson said it:

    "Anything is possible with Commander Coo-Coo Bananas in charge!"

    False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul with evil.--Socrates

    by Ranting Roland on Tue Dec 20, 2005 at 01:18:22 AM PST

  •  If only he could command (none)
    the English language.

    The beneficiaries are likely to be...large corporations and development firms. (O'Connor, J. dissenting in Kelo). God bless you, J. O'Connor.

    by xanthe on Tue Dec 20, 2005 at 03:42:04 AM PST

  •  Commander in Chief?? (none)
    Whats most intersting abot our "Commander in Chief" is that he was discharged completely unqualified to do ANYTHING in the military.
    Don't take my word for it read it right off the page:http: //
    Military Qualifications: NONE   "NONE??" Our "commander in Chief" is COMPLETELY unqualified to do ANYTHING in the iltary, not even paint rocks white.
    Look at the Awards and decorations box: none there too (TAFMS and TAFCS are NOT medals!)
    Our Weasel in Chief was discharged completely unqualified to do ANYTHING in the miltary and without a single medal!
    think that was what all the Swiftboating was about? to hide the fact that our Weasel in chief didn't get ANY medals at all, not even the ones a 6 month trainee has?
    Our Weasel in Chiefs "honorable discharge" is the biggest example ever of hiding chickenshit in plain sight by calling it chickensalad


    by exlrrp on Tue Dec 20, 2005 at 05:13:32 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site