But none of these phony choices were as absurd as the one Mr. Bush posed to justify his secret program of spying on Americans: save lives or follow the law.
...we think the president's arguments persuasive. Mr. Bush has not flinched from the criticism, and we applaud him for that.
Did you get this? Gonzales says it was okay to spy on Americans without authorization because the war resolution gave them that power. But when asked why they didn't ask for specific congressional authorization, he says, well, Congress wouldn't have given them that power.
Clinton got a blowjob.
No surprises here...but how is this story playing in Peoria?
From The Olympian (Olympia, Washington):
Every American should be outraged by the president's attempt to justify domestic spying. It's wrong, and the president should acknowledge that fact. He must be held accountable. [...]
Either we are a nation of laws and moral values or we are not. We cannot pick and choose which laws to abide by and which to ignore for the sake of convenience or expediency.
George Bush is not above the law.
Outstanding editorial...a message we'd like to get out to every Joe and Jane Six-pack in America. But Washington is a decidedly blue state, so let's look at the opinion from traditionally conservative areas. From The Idaho Statesman:
President Bush has made a serious, startling revelation: He has authorized a secret -- and ongoing -- campaign to eavesdrop on telephone calls to root out possible terrorist activity.
Congress must react in a serious, nonpartisan fashion. Lawmakers need to investigate the utility and the legality of this operation. Idaho's Republican delegation should join the call for hearings. [...]
"The fact that we're discussing this program is helping the enemy," Bush said Monday.
We think the discussion is necessary. In a system built on checks and balances, it's up to Congress to make the most of the discussion.
Ouch! And from The Telegraph (Macon, Georgia):
Last Friday all hell broke loose in Washington, D.C. The New York Times revealed a secret eavesdropping program by the National Security Agency, authorized in 2002 by President George W. Bush. The agency was allowed to spy on Americans without court-approved warrants. [...]
The president expects the American public to trust him...The question citizens need to ask is, with all the added powers included in the Patriot Act, why was it necessary to circumvent some of its provisions? [...]
He has stepped up to the line of what is legal and what is not. In the coming weeks we will find out if Mr. Bush crossed that line, or not.
Hmmm, not too friendly either. And from North Carolina, The Charlotte Observer says:
President Bush is right on one count. Protecting America from terrorist attacks requires the nation to think and act differently. But he is dead wrong to order secret wiretaps of citizens without obtaining warrants. That kind of spying is an assault on civil liberties -- one that should not stand. [...]
In times of war, it's even more vital for the nation's leaders to do their work with integrity and meticulous attention to the letter and spirit of the law.
The president owes Americans a direct apology for his actions, and a better explanation than the one he has provided of why he would disregard their right to due process.
From this quick and random sampling, no one was defending this latest assault on our Constitution....well, except the Washington Times and Free Republic.
Oh, and what about Peoria?
Is the leader of the free world suddenly anxious?
He should be, given the recent reports of his federal government spying on the international phone conversations and e-mails of American citizens, without court warrant. [...]
Perhaps the president's heart is in the right place. He says he just wants to protect Americans. Who doesn't? It's really quite simple: The Founders were clear that threats to the republic could come from inside as well as out. No president, of any party, under any circumstance, should be permitted to act like a king. This is troubling.
The Peorians have spoken.