Daily Kos

Dean's Wrong: I Don't Have the Power

Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 06:01:32 PM PDT

I owe my political awareness to Howard Dean. Because of him I started blogging, volunteering and donating to Democrats. Dean's rallying cry in the 2004 campaign was "You have the power."  The more I learned about the Republicans in control of our government, the more I wanted to use this power to help elect Democrats.

This is why I started supporting a local candidate running for Congress in my own district. Henry Hyde's district. With Christine Cegelis' campaign as a rallying point, I saw more Democrats active in my district than I've seen in my lifetime.

But now, as the Democratic primary approaches, I read of the DCCC again passing over a candidate who newly energized Democrats in my district overwhelmingly support. I read of the DCCC's backing of a candidate with no political experience and few ties to my district. I read of the advantages of military credentials and "wounds" - not issues that matter to the district. I read of the finest political consultants money can buy working for a candidate who hasn't even done any fundraising in the district yet.

As I watch this unfold, I wonder what power I really have.

I wonder how much power I have when a whisper campaign can be spread about Cegelis by a DCCC spokesman and anonymous incumbent Democrats and their aides:
While Democrats will not acknowledge publicly that they are frustrated with Cegelis, they have made it known they are open to other contenders' jumping into the race.

Bill Burton, spokesman for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), has said the committee has met with other potential candidates.

A Democratic aide on Capitol Hill said simply: "The Democratic field in Illinois-6 is still open."


I repeatedly hear that Cegelis is a poor candidate for one reason alone: her bottom line. But rarely do I hear any other criticism of her.  And even less seldom do I hear this criticism put together with the reality of who controls the donor base Cegelis relies on and who is pushing Duckworth's campaign:
Emanuel (D-Ill.) has been encouraging Duckworth to get in the race for the west suburban seat being vacated by Rep. Henry Hyde (R-Ill.), undermining Cegelis because he is convinced she cannot raise enough money to win a general election..

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) first broached the idea of a congressional run with Duckworth, who, as his guest, sat in the House gallery at the State of the Union address last February.

[...]

While Duckworth is a political rookie with no campaign experience or political organization behind her, if she runs, she will be able to tap into a turnkey political operation engineered in large part by Emanuel.

[...]

Emanuel has been shopping for someone to run against Cegelis for months, so the emergence of Duckworth was not unanticipated.


Let's put two and two together here. The real power for Democratic fundraising in Illinois is Emanuel, not small donors like me. Cegelis shares a donor base with Emanuel, who's district is right next door to IL-06. For months Emanuel has been actively undermining the Cegelis campaign publicly. Yet people still wonder why Cegelis has had difficulty with her fundraising?

It is Emanuel, not me, who has the power to shut down a campaign by choking off it's sources of high dollar donors. Donors in Chicago. Donors in his district. It is Emanuel, not me, that has the power to provide a network of top dollar consultants for turn-key campaign for Duckworth.

Who's gathering signatures to get Duckworth on the ballot? Who's canvassing for her campaign? Who is funding her campaign? Nearly 200 volunteers have canvassed and circulated petitions for Cegelis this year. Approximately 1,400 people donating an average of $120 each have funded the Cegelis campaign. Who has the power here? Volunteers or paid campaign staffers? With the first FEC filing deadline for Duckworth's campaign happening in March, people like me will not have the power to find out who is paying for Duckworth's staff, media, publicist, and turnkey campaign.

Who has the power to decide who runs in my district? Again, it looks not to be residents like me:

Emanuel wants Ladda "Tammy" Duckworth, an Army National Guard pilot who lost her legs and suffered a broken arm when Iraqi insurgents hit her helicopter with a rocket-propelled grenade, to jump into the race. According to Bill Burton, the Democratic Campaign Congressional Committee's (DCCC) spokesman, Emanuel believes her military credentials and wounds give her an edge in a district that no Democrat has ever won.

Military credentials and wounds! I understand the idea of a "fighting Dems" narrative, but didn't think such a narrative would trump name recognition, a volunteer network,  boots on the ground, or a deep understanding of district issues. The emphasis here seems to be on the photo-op Duckworth will generate, not district issues. What does that say to Democrats like me in the district?
Gayl Ferraro, chairwoman of the DuPage County Democratic Party, said the issue of Duckworth's residency coupled with her outside backing could hurt her prospects.

Ferraro noted that Democrats in DuPage, many of whom back Cegelis, have been working for years to build the party despite long odds.


Long odds that will just get longer, as Duckworth's campaign demonstrates that the power to choose a candidate rests not with voters like me, but in the hands of those with money and power outside my district. By ignoring the reality on the ground in IL-06, Rahm and the DCCC set up a lose/lose situation:
If Duckworth runs and wins:
This will be a blow to Democrats in the district who have used the Cegelis campaign as a rallying point as they work to build the local Democratic party. Such a win will most likely be viewed as a hostile take over of the district by Chicago Democrats and have a lasting effect on those most active in the district, as a bitter primary will hurt a race in which every vote will be needed to win.

If Duckworth runs and loses:
Roskam will jump all over this and run with the "Cegelis' own party wouldn't support her" narrative. Just as was done to Dean in his primary, Roskam will use this to falsely paint Cegelis as radically on the fringe of her own party. The primary would be essentially a complete vote of no confidence by the Party for Cegelis, making what is already going to be a difficult race for any Democrat that much more difficult for her. How will Rahm and the DCCC support Cegelis then, after working against her in the primary?


Gov. Dean told us "You have the power." In 2004 I believed him. As I watch what's happening to the Cegelis campaign, I'm not so sure anymore.

Tags: Rahm Emanuel, Tammy Duckworth, Christine Cegelis, IL-06, DCCC (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 54 comments

  •  Interesting... (none / 0)

    ...I've actually been talking to a consultant friend of mine about doing some fundraising for Ducksworth.  Tell me more about your candidate.

    "...that our civil rights have no dependance on our religious opinions, any more than our opinions in physics or geometry..." - Thomas Jefferson

    by cgrkumar on Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 06:06:42 PM PDT

  •  not individual power.... (none / 1)

    the power we have comes from collective action - possibly through party politics, certainly through social movements.

    very few of us have ANY power on our own.

    i HIGHLY recommend two books: "Doing Democracy" by bill moyer and "Waging Nonviolent Struggle: 20th Century Practice And 21st Century Potential" by gene sharp.

  •  What's wrong with a primary? (none / 0)

    I understand your devotion to your candidate, and I support Cegelis...

    But seriously, is there really anything wrong with the potential for a primary?

    Just because you (or I) support Cegelis - and your support is far more important than mine due to the fact that you are a constituent - does not mean that we automatically get what we want, nor does it mean that Ducksworth is necessarily worse...

    The only way to ensure a free press is to own one

    by RedDan on Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 06:22:52 PM PDT

    •  nothing (4.00 / 2)

      there's nothing wrong with a primary if 2 people want to run. .theres something wrong when the head of the DCCC actively works to undermine a strong candidate to put someone he prefers in instead..
      •  The job of the head of the DCCC (none / 0)

        is to get the strongest candidates possible in each race.  He obviously feels that Cegelis is weak.  If she wins the primary and proves him wrong, he'll come around.  If not, then she wouldn't have beaten Roskam either.

        The frogurt is also cursed. -8.25, -6.51

        by Superribbie on Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 06:30:04 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  How? (none / 0)

          How is Rahm going to come around and support someone he didn't support in the primary? How do you do that politically?

          "I firmly believe Cegelis is now the right candidate for IL-06 even though she was my third choice...."

          •  By sending cash (none / 0)

            You don't make any public statements as a DCCC head.  The only people even aware of the fact that there's a potential problem are political bloggers.  So there's a primary and the DCCC-backed candidate loses.  So what?  They still get behind the winner.  Did the DSCC or the party establishment get behind Obama in the Senate primary? No.  Did they afterwards? Yes.

            The frogurt is also cursed. -8.25, -6.51

            by Superribbie on Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 06:39:44 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  but (none / 0)

              But, in this case, it's not just that Emmanuel doesn't support Cegelis. He's actively been out there working to get someone to run against her and undermining her every step of the way. This has been covered in the political blogs AS WELL AS mainstream papers like the Sun Times.

              But, Michael, I think we DO HAVE the power if we head over to:

              http://www.cegelisforcongress.com/...

              •  I don't know (none / 0)

                This diary is genuine. What is happening in my district really bothers me. Had they gotten behind Cegelis last summer, she would be in great shape. People on the ground would be pumped and loaded for bear.

                I'm the base. I don't know where I'll wind up should this coup by Emanuel work. It's all money and connections. How is a citizen like me ever going to get to Washinton? Duckworth will be beholden, bought and paid for. She will owe me, and residents like me, nothing. We might as well not matter as she will be packaged and sold to the masses with no effort to get to know the district or residents of it.

                My feelings expressed in this diary are real.

            •  Actually they don't. (none / 0)

              In some cases a partisan organization will coalesce behind the nominee, as they did with Jan Schakowsky who beat Howie Carroll. In some cases when little egos and feelings gets hurt, the white boys take their toys and go home. There is a big difference in cases like Obama and Schakowsky in that those two were going to Washington no matter what. IL-9 is safe Democratic, and when Obama ran, the GOP had no options for a statewide nominee. With a seat that leans GOP, they have no reason to throw their weight behind somebody that kicked their butts in a primary. Don't discount the impact of ego in that game. Think that maybe establishment types do not want to admit that somebody beat them, because they live and die by the establishment; challenge the establishment and challenge their very oxygen.

              Nothing in this post has really been said, since i voted for Obama and therefore don't matter.

              by Fmrdempolop on Sat Dec 10, 2005 at 04:40:37 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

        •  Then Rahm ISN'T Doing His Job (none / 1)

          "The job of the head of the DCCC...is to get the strongest candidates possible in each race"

          Cegelis IS the strongest candidate, bar none. Scott has raised only $21K. And Duckworth has raised...well...ZERO! It's all being handed to her on a silver platter.

          BOTTOM LINE: Cegelis isn't a "member" of Rahm's DLC Club, so he wants her OUT! Which makes him a F*^cking SLIMEBALL...But we already knew that, didn't we?

          No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his accomplices. ~Edward R. Murrow

          by mlkisler on Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 09:06:49 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  A False Sense of Superiority (none / 1)

            Emanuel's using conventional wisdom because it's worked in the 2004 IL Senate race.  There's a report out on the IL congressional races that uses the senate race in the intro (pp. 2 & 3).

            Gary Boatwright has additional comments on Emanuel's strategy on MyDD.  Nothing like sacrificing democracy to remain in power.

            The only way to prove that it doesn't work is people voting for the candidate of their choice.  They have to remind him that they chose their representative.  No one else.

            (-5.38, -4.15)
            Qui tacet consentire videtur - "Whoever seems silent, consents."

            by Philosophe Forum on Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 09:25:20 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

      •  Uhhh... (none / 0)

        ...dude that is called "politics".  It is often messy, dirty and not nice.
    •  I believe in primaries (none / 0)

      But keep in mind: Cegelis already HAD primary competition: Lindy Scott, an evangelical professor at Christian Wheaton College.  Before he dropped out of the race, Peter O'Maller represented a different face of Democrats.

      The problem is not that there's a primary, the problem is how it's been imposed from without, by a power structure completely removed from any sort of grassroots.  I personally welcome a primary (even this one, as underhanded as its roots are).  However, I resent the slamming of Cegelis as a poor fundraiser when Duckworth will likely not have to do one single thing to put together a campaign.  Disingenuity at its finest...

      "What a waste it is to lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is being very wasteful. How true that is." --Dan Quayle

      by jakester on Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 11:45:17 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Well (none / 0)

    I agree that an ugly primary is bad, but if this can stay civil, it can be ok.  I am undecided on this one.  On the one hand, Cegelis has run strongly here before and has the organization.  On the other hand, she raised less than $200K through 9/30/05 despite essentially running since November 2004.  That really ain't much.  

    And I don't buy the conspiracy theory that Emanuel is telling donors not to give to her.  There is no motive and is completely counterproductive to his big goal, which is a majority.  If the two of them had a history of feuding, then maybe I'd buy it, but as far as I know, the two don't even really know each other.

    So, have the primary.  Keep it civil, and it's actually a win-win.  If Cegelis triumphs, it demonstrates her strength and makes the party more likely to augment her paltry fundraising.  If Duckworth wins, it means the opposite and saves us from a potential Ginny Schrader repeat.  I tend to think that Cegelis is strong and would win such a primary against a carpetbagging neophyte, but if she can't, I want to know about it.

    The frogurt is also cursed. -8.25, -6.51

    by Superribbie on Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 06:23:54 PM PDT

    •  Again with the fundraising (none / 0)

      Please note who controls the purse strings on this one, and stop faulting Cegelis for not being able to overcome Rahm Emanuel, his influence and his connections.

      As to the civility of the primary, I'm just a guy with a blog. I'm pissed. But I'm not the campaign.

      I'm sure Cegelis will keep it civil. She wants what's best for the district. And she wants to win. And if she can't win, I'm sure she'll want a Democrat to beat Roskam. But I think she can win. This just makes Roskam's job so much easier regardless of the outcome.

    •  Emanuel Manipulations have an Ulterior Motive (none / 0)

      It's about learning ALL the facts thru complete research.  That's why I'm glad you're still in the dialogue.  You have access to the IL report.  There's one from MI, too.  There's a reason why IL remains 50/50 Dems/Reps.

      If that doesn't work for you, how about "politics as usual".  Maybe that worked decades ago.  It's now broken, delusional conventional wisdom.

      (-5.38, -4.15)
      Qui tacet consentire videtur - "Whoever seems silent, consents."

      by Philosophe Forum on Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 07:57:42 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  You've COMPLETELY Missed The Point (none / 0)

      "If the two of them had a history of feuding, then maybe I'd buy it, but as far as I know, the two don't even really know each other."

      This primary isn't Duckworth -vs- Cegelis. Duckworth is just a pawn. This Primary is RAHM -vs- DISTRICT RESIDENTS!

      No way this Primary stays civil...Rahm has already seen to that.

      No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his accomplices. ~Edward R. Murrow

      by mlkisler on Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 09:26:40 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Wait a minute... (none / 0)

    You say that Dick Durbin is pushing a Ducksworth run...but Dick Durbin is listed on the endorsements page of Cegelis' website.

    So what gives?

    The only way to ensure a free press is to own one

    by RedDan on Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 06:25:48 PM PDT

    •  He's a fan (none / 0)

      Ever since she provided testimony in the Feb/Mar Senate hearings, Durbin has been one of Duckworth's biggest fans.  After doing all the reading of available media copy (which didn't start until 3 mos AFTER she sustained her injuries), I'm a big fan of Duckworth -- for a different CD.

      When the Party's #2 guy gives you a heads up, you act & budget 6 or 7 figures for it.

      (-5.38, -4.15)
      Qui tacet consentire videtur - "Whoever seems silent, consents."

      by Philosophe Forum on Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 06:57:55 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Durbin Is A Two-Faced Back Stabber (none / 0)

      He endorsed Cegelis before he supported Duckworth...How very Kerryesque!

      That's not fair, really.

      Durbin formally endorsed Cegelis in the '04 run, which, I'm sure is why that's on there. Apparently he hasn't asked her to take his name off the website.

      Durbin's PUBLIC stance is that he will "remain neutral" during the Primary, then support the winner. THAT, of course, is BULLSHIT! He's MOVING MOUNTAINS for Duckworth...But it's all happening behind the scenes...Which makes HIM a slimeball too.

      No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his accomplices. ~Edward R. Murrow

      by mlkisler on Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 09:37:28 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Excellent as always! (none / 1)

    How can anyone continue to not support Cegelis when you post your diaries???  

    Recommended -- with gusto!

    (-5.38, -4.15)
    Qui tacet consentire videtur - "Whoever seems silent, consents."

    by Philosophe Forum on Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 06:43:36 PM PDT

  •  Sorry I'm late to the diary. (none / 0)

    When you mentioned to me that you would be writing this diary, I thought it was the other one at SoapBlox/Chicago, about Cegelis and her solid and longstanding opposition to the Iraq war. When I didn't see it here I didn't know what to think.

    But excellant diary once again. I'm pulled between responsibilities at the moment, but I intend to give this some good thought and a good reply. But for now Great Work!

  •  Will there be a primary? (none / 0)

    McCain=Bush 3rd Term--US worst nightmare; Stop Republican obstructionism- Elect a Democratic Majority.

    by timber on Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 07:15:59 PM PDT

  •  You Still Have the Power (4.00 / 2)

    And Emanuel is going in the wrong direction.  The DLC's days are numbered.  No more republican philosophy from Democrats for me.  I won't support candidates I don't believe in, just because the party tells me to.  Cegelis has my support.
  •  Uninformed outsider's comments (none / 1)

    Maybe I've said this before, but I think outsiders/carpetbaggers always have a steep hill to climb.  Voters want local people.

    From my vantage point, it does seem like this candidate is being chosen mostly on the basis of her wounds (first) and service (second), which feels opportunistic and kind of creepy.  That could disappear if she turned out to be smart, well-spoken, a great campaigner, etc.  Has anyone even heard her speak?

    I love this "fighting Dems" thing we have going but there have to be some basic other qualifications for running - does Duckworth have them?

    If there's a primary, so be it.  With luck it will prove who's the best candidate, not just the best-funded.

    Underdogs can win, underdogs who don't have establishment support, if they have a devoted grassroots army.  Please don't let this situation drag you down, just keep fighting.

  •  you are in a factional fight (4.00 / 2)

    emmanuel is going to push a candidate for his faction, and we will with ours. it is up to us to beat them in the primary. nobody said it would be easy to talke the party back. we will have to pry the levers of power out of their hands, and it will take a generation. cegelis is a good candidate, and we need to back her up. but don't be surprised that the DLC pushes back.

    surf putah, your friendly neighborhood central valley samizdat

    by wu ming on Thu Dec 08, 2005 at 08:40:44 PM PDT

  •  Throughout Emanuel's career... (none / 0)

    ...it has been about money.  It has been about fundraising.  It has been about schmoozing with money people for money.

    If you want the Democratic Party to be the mirror image of the Republican Party, with sleazy fundraising, and candidates owing the money people instead of we the people, then ignore this battle.

    If you want a different country, support Christine Cegelis.

    Carolyn Kay
    MakeThemAccountable.com

    •  What's wrong with money? (none / 0)

      No, seriously, what's wrong with money?

      What do you use to pay your bills? Campaigns cost money, they are not-for profit organizations that have no good or service to sell, but have a lot of expenses. They have to pay staff and advertising and housekeeping costs. If a campaign has raised a small amount of money in two years, it says that either they aren't focused on what they need to do to win the general, or that few people are willing to financially support them. Those are just the facts.

      It's well and good to talk about grassroots and volunteers, but realistically how much can they do without funds? Of course there's the old "Money isn't everything, just ask President Forbes or Senator Huffington" but you have to have enough funds to run a good race. Volunteers can supplement a good effort, but rarely if ever can they be the whole thing. If you had a business would you rather advertise on the radio or through direct mail, or would you get 100 average folks to knock doors in a city and talk about your product? For that matter, how many goods and services have you bought because somebody knocked on your door and told you about them or because you got a flyer on your windshield?

      Nothing in this post has really been said, since i voted for Obama and therefore don't matter.

      by Fmrdempolop on Sat Dec 10, 2005 at 04:50:05 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Millionaire and Influential only then (none / 0)

        Why not just put the seat up to the highest bidder then? If ordinary people, like you an me, are not able to ever hold office, why shoud we be so upset with the corruption we see in Washington? Why all the upset bloggers about the Patriot Act, Estate Tax cuts, Capitol Gains breaks, and host of other cuts for the rich? If they are the only ones who can afford to run for office, why shouldn't they tax ordinary working people like you and me to death. What are we going to do about it? Run for office? Oops, that's right, we ordinary people are just there to help them out by knocking on a few doors so we feel good that we've particiapted in our "Democracy."

        Come on. See this for what this is. Emanuel is throwing money at this race to shut down the Cegelis campaign. Money that should be used to defeat Republicans, not Democrats.

        •  That's not what I said. (none / 0)

          What I said was that money is important when running a race of this type. You can't handshake your way into an office with a consituency of ~588,00. If you can't write it you have to raise it. Nothing prevents ordinary folks from running for office, they just have to figure out how to raise the necessary funds. You can't just expect things to be handed to you because you want them and you happen to be a nice person.

          What I also said was that low numbers such as these indicate one of two things, one is that she's not asking for money [which means she's not doing her job as a candidate] or that she is asking and contributors are not writing checks, which means they are not buying into her candidacy. You can't counter that by saying "Democracy!!!" The facts are what they are; campaigns cost money and she does not right now have it.

          Nothing in this post has really been said, since i voted for Obama and therefore don't matter.

          by Fmrdempolop on Sun Dec 11, 2005 at 04:24:16 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  But, but Cunningham, Burns and Ney (none / 0)

    get lots of checks.

    DeLay gets 'em from Abramoff and distributes all around.

    Obviously, those races called by the MONEY MEN are what make Democracy great.

    Give it a rest.

    My vote is for Diebold,  ESS&S and the rest that make America strong.

    Where is Ken Lay when you really need him?

Permalink | 54 comments