Daily Kos

My reply to Rep. Mark Kennedy (R-MN) re:Schiavo case

Mon Mar 21, 2005 at 03:14:31 PM PDT

I have been hesitant to write anything about this issue as I feel it has already garnered too much coverage but I was curious when I saw that Rep. Kennedy had voted for the legislation (not surprised in the least mind you). I accessed his website and found the press release that follows in bold print on the first page of his website and immediately begin crafting a retort. My retort follows below.
Press Release- Kennedy: Let Terri Schiavo Live

Washington, D.C. - The following is Congressman Mark Kennedy's statement on the floor of the House of Representatives, during House debate of legislation that will ensure Terri Schiavo's constitutional right to life will be given federal court review.

"Since I was a child, to this very day on the floor of this House, I have been guided by a fundamental principle: that we as men and women and all of us as a society, will be judged according to how we treat the most vulnerable among us. That is the issue we face today.

"I believe Terri Schiavo's case must be judged in that context. For me, the following points are the most important:

"Terri left no living will or written instructions. Terri's mom and dad, the people that have loved her the longest and have fought so valiantly for her, want responsibility for their daughter. Terri's life has value and worth and we must do everything we can to protect her rights, and those of other disabled people in America.

"The law ought not to provide murderers guilty of terrible crimes more protections than an innocent young woman lying in a Florida hospital bed. So today, we must act on behalf of Terri Schiavo. Congress must act on behalf of all those who cannot speak for themselves or defend themselves.

"Americans believe in a culture of life, not a culture that tells the weak and the vulnerable there is no place for them at our table. We make progress toward that culture of life one life at a time, one heart at a time. Today, let us start by helping Terri Schiavo live."

Congressman Kennedy,

I am writing in response to the press release regarding the Terry Schiavo matter found on your website. First allow me to express my utter disdain for the ridiculous dog and pony show that Congress has become. Every last one of you on the hill should be ashamed of yourselves. Obfuscation of the truth, debating non-issues, covering up the misdeeds of fellow elected officials, and passing legislation that flies in the face of everything this country was founded on is, in my humble opinion, not government of, for, and by the people. I shall attempt to rebut each of your statements in turn. Please accept my apology in advance if I should miss anything.

"...we as men and women and all of us as a society, will be judged according to how we treat the most vulnerable among us. That is the issue we face today."

According to the United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey, nearly 36 million Americans lived below the poverty level in 2003 (twenty percent of which were children under the age of five). 1 How did Congress respond to those of our society who are truly vulnerable? You (Congress) passed the bankruptcy bill which makes it harder for the average lower or middle class family or individual to ever escape from the mountains of debt that have been propagated by the banking and credit card industries in this country. I submit to you that Terry Schiavo is not vulnerable in the least. She ceased being vulnerable (or for that matter subject to any silly notions of human emotion) 15 years ago when her brain died as a result of her tragic accident. This is the issue we face today because you (Congress) choose not to concentrate on the issues that matter to your constituents (such as your majority leader's multiple ethics violations, the attempted gutting of Social Security, and continuing scandal and reprehensible action in the realm of foreign policy.)

"Terri left no living will or written instructions. Terri's mom and dad, the people that have loved her the longest and have fought so valiantly for her, want responsibility for their daughter. Terri's life has value and worth and we must do everything we can to protect her rights and those of other disabled people in America."

Florida state law contains a clause of Spousal Guardianship within its marital laws. Although her mother and father obviously love her dearly and are quite obviously having a difficult time accepting their daughter's condition, according to the laws of Florida, they have no legal precedence in this matter. Under the law of the land, the decision belongs to her husband, her de facto guardian. This is why the Florida courts ruled the way they did in this matter. Her parents want responsibility for her but under the law of the land they are not entitled to it. As to protecting the rights of the disabled in this country, there have been widespread reports of veterans of the Iraq war (a war that we are currently fighting) returning to find homelessness, poverty, post traumatic stress disorder (the likes of which this country has not seen since the Vietnam War), and a proposed budget which falls well short of the money the VA needs to treat our brave men and women.2

"The law ought not to provide murderers guilty of terrible crimes more protections than an innocent young woman lying in a Florida hospital bed. So today, we must act on behalf of Terri Schiavo. Congress must act on behalf of all those who cannot speak for themselves or defend themselves."

Under Florida state law, Ms. Schiavo does have someone to speak for her and on her behalf: her husband. He has spoken at length on this matter and made his wishes (and Terry's wishes as told to him) known. She does not need you, the members of Congress, to act on her behalf. As far as us granting rights to convicted prisoners where end of life issues are concerned, it is quite common for the individual to be granted early release so the prison (and local taxpayers) do not have to foot the bill for the inmate's care. So much for that culture of life you talk about (as quoted below).3

"Americans believe in a culture of life, not a culture that tells the weak and the vulnerable there is no place for them at our table. We make progress toward that culture of life one life at a time, one heart at a time. Today, let us start by helping Terri Schiavo live."

According to an ABC News poll conducted yesterday (March 20th), 63 percent of Americans support the removal of Ms. Schiavo's feeding tube and a full 60 percent oppose federal intervention in this matter. Clearly you are out of touch with the wants of the American people if you would make the statement I have quoted above. Furthermore, a culture of life does not allow for the senseless killing of thousands of our service members and countless civilians in a war based on shoddy intelligence work, a PR juggernaut that seemingly swallows everything in its path, and outright lies to the American people. A culture of life values every life within the culture including the lives of the poor and downtrodden, those of other nations / ideologies, and all life in general. We do not live in a culture of life.

In summary, I submit to you that Congress has completely lost touch with the American people. You have taken advantage of the plight of this poor family simply for political gains. This law sets a terrible precedent in the legal workings of our government. Our system only works (as the founding fathers understood) with a rigid and strictly defined set of checks and balances between the three branches of government. You have, by enacting this law, subverted the Constitution of the United States, subjugated the will of the people, and made a mockery of the United States legislature. I therefore ask you and all of your brethren who voted for this travesty, most humbly, have you no shame sir? Have you no decency?  

A VERY disgruntled constituent,

Christopher Greenfield

Works Cited
1.http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Products/Profiles/Chg/2003/ACS/Tabular/010/01000US3.htm

2. http://newstandardnews.net/content/?action=show_item&itemid=1468

http://www.streetroots.org/past_issues/2005/01_14/ruth_kovacs.html   

3. http://talkleft.com/new_archives/009721.html

Tags: (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 14 comments

  •  My heretofore apolitical husband ... (4.00 / 4)

    ... sent this letter to Sen. Warner (OF HIS OWN VOLITION TOO! Amazing!)

    I understand this email probably won't make it to Senator Warner himself, but I have a need for the answer to be from the perspective of a Legislative
    Branch member.

    A recent legislative intervention confuses me. It is the one concerning the Terri Schiavo feeding tube and the steriod issue hearings.

    The most simplistic view of this case is that the law, as it is, gives the right of guardianship in this case to the husband. The parents didn't like
    his decision. Did the incident that induced the vegetative state get investigated? Was the husband responsible? If the answer is no to the husband involvement, then the parents exhausted their appeals. Let the husband make the tough decision. But no, this is where I get confused on the
    role of our Federal government.

    I don't really understand how the legislative and Executive branch has any authority to intervene in such low level individual personal situation. I
    thought the responsibility lies to the judical branch to iron this out. Oh, thats right, the Judicial branch did hear this case and rendered a decision that the parents didn't like, so the Legislative and Executive got it signed into law to get the case re-reviewed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Funny, that another Bush runs that
    state. I would guess then that this court will carry out the judicial-political decision desired by the religious right wing party lead by our President, George W. Bush. Is this another indication that the current presidential administration's can invoke their religious right wing beliefs and neglect the Constititution, as in the balance of power between the three branches of the federal government.

    What precedents are going to be interpreted by the action done by the Legislative and Executive branches in this case?

    Why can't our government respond this quickly on other issues relevant to all the citizens of the US? Or have they, by setting in place the ground
    work to overturn the  right-to-die choice we now have.

    A frustrated American citizen

    "The force is really rather strong with you, Luke" - Eddie Izzard (I miss you, La 3/5/06)

    by Bexley Lane on Mon Mar 21, 2005 at 03:17:22 PM PDT

    •  Kudos to your husband also! (none / 0)

      Also a wonderful letter. Perhaps if enough people speak out on this issue (and the broader issue of obfuscation) it will be realized for what a sham it is.

      "This is where some of my dreams become realities. And where some of my realities become dreams." -Willie Wonka

      by green917 on Mon Mar 21, 2005 at 09:24:24 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Great letter (none / 1)

    But I won't hold my breath waiting for you to get a cogent reply which responds to the points that you have made.

    Maybe a copy to the local paper as an LTE would force a response?

    I am a warrior for peace. And not a gentle man... Steve Mason, 1940-2005

    by Wayward Wind on Mon Mar 21, 2005 at 03:20:28 PM PDT

  •  Great letter. (none / 0)

    It is so compelling.  It is impossible not to follow the logic that shows the absolute hypocrisy of his statement.  Yet somehow there are those that will not.

    Can I have my country back yet?

    by JulieIde on Mon Mar 21, 2005 at 03:20:37 PM PDT

  •  Thank you (none / 1)

    for taking that pathetic excuse for a Congressman to task.  He's not mine, but I hear he's going for Dayton's seat, so he's certainly trying.

    At least my Bush lap-poodle of a Congressman (Gutkneckt) was unable to vote.  Saved us all some embarrassment.  Of course, since the bloody Mayo Clinic is smack-dab in the middle of the district, maybe he had other motives for not attending the latest...

    Republican "Passion of life" play.

    Anyhow, congrats to you for writing such a fine letter and taking that disgusting twerp to task.

    If there is any Justice, hopefully this demonstrated to all of America what pathetic little demons those involved in the CULT of ('innocent') life really are.

    Terri wasn't the only one with a vegetative brain on display last night.  Mr. Kennedy was right there with her.

    You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him. --James D. Miles

    by Yaright on Mon Mar 21, 2005 at 03:25:55 PM PDT

  •  Hey there fellow Minnesotan! (none / 0)

    Great letter to that opportunistic lump of evil known as Rep. Mark Kennedy.  

    I saw Kennedy debate Patty Wetterling live last November, and I had to restrain myself from bum rushing the stage and cold-cocking the phony little puke.

    He MUST not replace Dayotn as Senator in 2006.  

    JOHN McCAIN = George W. Bush's 3rd term.

    by chumley on Mon Mar 21, 2005 at 03:33:26 PM PDT

  •  I love it! (none / 1)

    A letter to Congress that starts with a confession of "...utter disdain..." for the whole institution.  

    Fantastic letter.  Even if Kennedy will never see it--who cares.  It's inspiring, passionate politics.

    ---
    Tired of violent language from right-wing pundits? Buy my book: Outright Barbarous

    by Jeffrey Feldman on Mon Mar 21, 2005 at 03:45:26 PM PDT

  •  Excellent letter! (none / 0)

    Thanks for sharing.

    "The revolution's just an ethical haircut away..." Billy Bragg

    by grannyhelen on Mon Mar 21, 2005 at 04:05:40 PM PDT

  •  Exxcellent! (none / 0)

    And you darn well BETTER get that into the Strib.

    Along with the rest of us as well!!!!

  •  Thank you all! (none / 0)

    Thank you all and hey to all of my neighbors up here in the great white north.

    "This is where some of my dreams become realities. And where some of my realities become dreams." -Willie Wonka

    by green917 on Mon Mar 21, 2005 at 09:41:05 PM PDT

Permalink | 14 comments