Daily Kos

How much do we pay politicians?

Sun Apr 17, 2005 at 03:40:12 PM PDT

With wages dropping for the first time since 1990 (see Salary.Com), how are our politicians doing?

Here are best estimates for federal level, not including various other benefits and perks:

Congressional House & Senate Members: $158,100
House & Senate Majority/Minority Leader: $175,600
Speaker of the House: $203,000
Associate Supreme Court Justices: $193,000
Supreme Court Chief Justice: $203,000
Vice President: $203,000 ($10K expenses)
President: $450,000 ($50K expenses)

Read on for link to estimates at sample state and local levels.

When you get to the state levels, salaries start to seem less superhuman. But at the local level, salaries are still absymally low. In Chattanooga, for instance, city council members get paid about $10K per year. This is supposed to be part time but it never is.

An article from the Atlanta Journal Constitution today talks about the trouble with politician's salaries in Atlanta. Here's an excerpt:


Perception problems

Since most city councils in Georgia serve four-year terms, a double-digit percentage increase once a term can be perceived as larger than if smaller raises were awarded annually.

County commissions and other elected bodies can, by law, sidestep the political baggage by letting the Legislature set their raises once a year, although that can be a gamble.

Cobb County now goes a step further by budgeting raises for county commissioners at the same percentage increase that all other county employees get -- 4 percent this year. Then it gets the Legislature's blessing.

"For the last several years we pegged it to other employees," Commission Chairman Sam Olens said. "I think that's what limits the excesses. It's a lot easier to have raises annually."

When officials go 10 years without a raise and then give themselves a big increase, people notice, Olens said.

That may account for the flurry of requests for pay raises at the Legislature this year -- and for their failure.

After 20 years without a pay increase, the DeKalb school board asked its legislative delegation to more than double member salaries from $12,000 to $25,000.

The delegation settled on $18,000, a 50 percent raise. But Sen. John Wiles (R-Kennesaw) held the measure in the State and Local Government Committee, which he chairs.

Wiles also killed the raises for the Marietta school board when he refused to go along with fellow Cobb Sen. Steve Thompson's local legislation.

"I thought a 100 percent pay raise too much at a time we give teachers 2 percent," Wiles said.

The DeKalb proposal came to his committee late, Wiles said, and he was busy with other legislation. Moreover, it was controversial and the local delegation was divided on the measure, he said.

Atlanta City Councilwoman Debra Starnes is concerned that the nature of part-time public servants is being redefined by increasing salaries.

"I'm gravely concerned about the direction the council is headed," said Starnes, who is not going to run again and voted against the pay raise. "I'm concerned about people seeing it as a livelihood instead of a public service. People are settling in for the long term, and that makes them concerned about the pay."

Starnes also sees the quality of candidates for public office declining. For some, the pay for serving as a part-time elected official is more than they could earn in private industry. "I see it as a trend in elected governing bodies."

Poll

Are local politicians' salaries typically fair?

38%5 votes
38%5 votes
23%3 votes

| 13 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 4 comments

  •  Relative to local government employee pay (none / 1)

    The salaries are adequate.  What needs to be addressed is why formerly part-time council positions are now require the full time of politicians.  And how many local politicians use their position to be compensated in other ways.

    Politics was imaged to be civic duty or public service, not full-time employment.  Ordinary citizens used to be adequately qualified for politics.

    •  I'd also like to know why (none / 0)

      In particular, I'd like to know if they really are working full-time on things strictly within their job description.  A lot of city employees have been doing things lately that seem a little bit iffy, like the Houston mayor's "fact-finding" trips to other countries, paid for by the city in order to "encourage ties that will foster international trade".  Sure, they take up his time, but one might argue they aren't entirely necessary.

      Also, time spent campaigning for the next election shouldn't count.  This one's harder to quantify, because many government officials should be giving speeches, but some of the speeches tend to swim into "campaign speech" territory.

      "See a world of tanks, ruled by a world of banks." —Sol Invictus

      by Delirium on Sun Apr 17, 2005 at 04:51:11 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Trips overseas (none / 0)

        Yes. In fact our new mayor of Chattanooga, Ron Littlefield, who won on jobs and jobs, says he's off to far lands to find jobs and jobs. That's if Chattanooga can compete with China.

        The Time is Now For Change

        by southlib on Mon Apr 18, 2005 at 11:41:15 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  We need to pay local elected officals more (none / 0)

    If want to get talented people to run for local and state elected positions, we need to pay them at least as much as executive agency heads recieve at the same level (e.g. Full time City Coucil members should get the same as City Administrators and State Legislators should get the same as State Agency heads).  

    I know some talented people who fiscally can not run for office, even though they want to, because they wouldn't be able to support their familes.  

    All these policies do is ensure that elected officals only represent the elite who can afford to be in elected office.  

Permalink | 4 comments