Daily Kos

The Fallujah Mosque Shooting, Now Unedited

Wed May 11, 2005 at 07:47:38 PM PDT

Front-paged at BoomanTribune.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usIraq Videos From the Insurgents: Terrorism expert Evan Kohlmann has posted video footage, filmed by the insurgency's documentarians, that features "ongoing insurgent operations targeting coalition military and Iraqi security forces" since April 27.

And yesterday, for the first time, freelance journalist Kevin Sites permitted the posting of the entire unedited video "of the Marine shooting a wounded Iraqi in a Fallujah mosque last year," reports blogger Dan Gillmor. Sites allowed NPR's "Day To Day" to post a link to the video following Sites' appearance on the show yesterday (audio).

: : : More below : : :

Alex Chadwick, the host for NPR's "Day to Day," landed the first interview on May 10, 2005 with Kevin Sikes since the incident in November 2004, reports the Boing Boing blog.

Sites' video shows five men wounded from the previous day's fighting lying on the floor of the mosque. One Marine can be heard shouting to others that a man was only "playing dead."

The Marine corporal in question appears to fire a round from his weapon into the Iraqi's head, and another Marine says, "Dead now." ("Day to Day")

At his own site Kevin Sikes [PHOTO BELOW] talks about his inner turmoil since his video of the mosque shooting became worldwide news:

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us To Devil Dogs of the 3.1:

Since the shooting in the Mosque, I've been haunted that I have not been able to tell you directly what I saw or explain the process by which the world came to see it as well. As you know, I'm not some war zone tourist with a camera who doesn't understand that ugly things happen in combat. I've spent most of the last five years covering global conflict. But I have never in my career been a 'gotcha' reporter -- hoping for people to commit wrongdoings so I can catch them at it.

This week I've even been shocked to see myself painted as some kind of anti-war activist. Anyone who has seen my reporting on television or has read the dispatches on this website is fully aware of the lengths I've gone to play it straight down the middle -- not to become a tool of propaganda for the left or the right.

But I find myself a lightning rod for controversy in reporting what I saw occur in front of me, camera rolling.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

It's time you to have the facts from me, in my own words, about what I saw -- without imposing on that Marine -- guilt or innocence or anything in between. I want you to read my account and make up your own minds about whether you think what I did was right or wrong. All the other armchair analysts don't mean a damn to me.

Here it goes.

It's Saturday morning and we're still at our strong point from the night before, a clearing between a set of buildings on the southern edge of the city. The advance has been swift, but pockets of resistance still exist. In fact, we're taking sniper fire from both the front and the rear.

Weapons Company uses its 81's (mortars) where they spot muzzle flashes. ...

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

When we arrive at the front entrance, we see that another squad has already entered before us.

The lieutenant asks them, "Are there people inside?"

One of the Marines raises his hand signaling five.

"Did you shoot them," the lieutenant asks?

"Roger that, sir, " the same Marine responds.

"Were they armed?" The Marine just shrugs and we all move inside.

... I see the same black plastic body bags spread around the mosque. [M]ore surprising, I see the same five men that were wounded from Friday as well. It appears that one of them is now dead and three are bleeding to death from new gunshot wounds. The fifth is partially covered by a blanket and is in the same place and condition he was in on Friday, near a column. He has not been shot again. I look closely at both the dead and the wounded. There don't appear to be any weapons anywhere.

"These were the same wounded from yesterday," I say to the lieutenant. He takes a look around and goes outside the mosque with his radio operator to call in the situation to Battalion Forward HQ.

I see an old man in a red kaffiyeh lying against the back wall. Another is face down next to him, his hand on the old man's lap -- as if he were trying to take cover. I squat beside them, inches away and begin to videotape them. Then I notice that the blood coming from the old man's nose is bubbling. A sign he is still breathing. So is the man next to him.

While I continue to tape, a Marine walks up to the other two bodies about fifteen feet away, but also lying against the same back wall.

Then I hear him say this about one of the men:

"He's fucking faking he's dead -- he's faking he's fucking dead."

Through my viewfinder I can see him raise the muzzle of his rifle in the direction of the wounded Iraqi. There are no sudden movements, no reaching or lunging.

However, the Marine could legitimately believe the man poses some kind of danger. Maybe he's going to cover him while another Marine searches for weapons.

Instead, he pulls the trigger. There is a small splatter against the back wall and the man's leg slumps down.

"Well he's dead now," says another Marine in the background.

I am still rolling. I feel the deep pit of my stomach. The Marine then abruptly turns away and strides away, right past the fifth wounded insurgent lying next to a column. He is very much alive and peering from his blanket. He is moving, even trying to talk. ...

[T]wo other marines in the room raise their weapons as the man tries to talk.

For a moment, I'm paralyzed still taping with the old man in the foreground. I ... tell the Marines again, what I had told the lieutenant -- that this man -- all of these wounded men -- were the same ones from yesterday. That they had been disarmed treated and left here.

[T]he Marine who fired the shot became aware that I was in the room. He came up to me and said, "I didn't know sir-I didn't know." The anger that seemed present just moments before turned to fear and dread.

The wounded man then tries again to talk to me in Arabic.

He says, "Yesterday I was shot... please... yesterday I was shot over there -- and talked to all of you on camera -- I am one of the guys from this whole group. I gave you information. Do you speak Arabic? I want to give you information." (This man has since reportedly been located by the Naval Criminal Investigation Service which is handling the case.)

In the aftermath, the first question that came to mind was why had these wounded men been left in the mosque?

It was answered by staff judge advocate Lieutenant Colonel Bob Miller -- who interviewed the Marines involved following the incident. After being treated for their wounds on Friday by Navy Corpsman (I personally saw their bandages) the insurgents were going to be transported to the rear when time and circumstances allowed.

The area, however, was still hot. And there were American casualties to be moved first.

Also, the squad that entered the mosque on Saturday was different than the one that had led the attack on Friday.

It's reasonable to presume they may not have known that these insurgents had already been engaged and subdued a day earlier. Yet when this new squad engaged the wounded insurgents on Saturday, perhaps really believing they had been fighting or somehow posed a threat -- those Marines inside knew from their training to check the insurgents for weapons and explosives after disabling them, instead of leaving them where they were and waiting outside the mosque for the squad I was following to arrive.

More from Xeni Jardin at BoingBoing:

The U.S. Marine Corps announced that it won't prosecute that Marine corporal, who was not identified, for his actions. Sites was on assignment for NBC on Nov. 13, 2004, and was following a squad into a mosque that the day before insurgents were using to fire on U.S. troops. The Marines were part of a U.S.-led offensive to clear Fallujah of its insurgent strongholds. Sites' video shows five men wounded from the previous day's fighting lying on the floor of the mosque. One Marine can be heard shouting to others that a man was only "playing dead." The Marine corporal in question appears to fire a round from his weapon into the Iraqi's head, and another Marine says, "Dead now."

Sites has made the complete, unedited video available for viewing online. During the discussion with NPR's Chadwick, Sites said that while releasing only an edited version of the tape seemed at the time like the most responsible thing to do, given the heated political context -- he now questions that decision.

Should media second-guess the public's ability to handle the whole truth?

Would the additional detail have provided context that might have changed the way the public understood the incident?

We should have been shown the full video from the outset. Censoring the video merely made us more suspicious of the report, and of the media.

Tags: (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 11 comments

  •  We should have ... (4.00 / 10)

    had the full video last November.  

    Also: It sounds, from Sites' entry on his blog, that he has suffered a lot as a result of the publicity.  We can only imagine the reaction he got from soldiers he'd been with in Iraq and from other journalists, as well as the public.

    Of note:  On Sites' site, he also has incredible photos of the devastation from the tsunami.

  •  Bush (4.00 / 2)

    I don't blame this soldier as much as I blame Bush for starting this illegal invasion. Putting our troops in impossible positions.  Basically, the buck stops with Bush.  This is on his head.  

    I do not know what weapons World War III will be fought with. World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. -- Albert Einstein

    by elveta on Wed May 11, 2005 at 08:05:47 PM PDT

    •  n/t (none / 0)

      I tend to agree with you, Elveta. I like your rational approach to this insane situation. Those soldiers were following orders and had been involved in heated battles and been shot at for days, probably had had little sleep, and were extremely stressed. None of us knows how we'd react in a similar situation, under similar stresses. What he did was wrong and irrational. But, the real responsibility, as you say, belongs wholly to Bush.
  •  video changes nothing. (none / 1)

    it's still cold-blooded murder. and a murderer is now going to go unpunished. that is the inevitable conclusion, unless you think the geneva conventions are "quaint"...which, I've noted, some here seem to.

    It's called the american dream because you have to be asleep to believe it. - G. Carlin

    by RabidNation on Wed May 11, 2005 at 08:16:41 PM PDT

    •  Sad fact of war (none / 0)

      and you never know how it is going to affect you
      until you are there... In the zone of madness, where
      boys shoot boys cause they are following orders.

      Overthrow the Government ~Vote~

      by missliberties on Wed May 11, 2005 at 08:34:48 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  nah-uh. (none / 1)

        it's a sad fact of war when one soldier shoots another in battle.

        it's an atrocity when someone shoots an unarmed, defenseless, already wounded individual. not to mention a war crime, punishable by execution.

        or do different rules apply to "our boys"?

        guess it worked for Lt. Calley...

        It's called the american dream because you have to be asleep to believe it. - G. Carlin

        by RabidNation on Thu May 12, 2005 at 12:25:25 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  I might add: (4.00 / 2)

          consider here the US reaction to the Nazis' execution of unarmed american POWs in WWII. America was rightly outraged. War crime 'n' all.

          Here, we have an exact corollary. Only difference being that the killers are MURRICANS and the victims are slightly brownish-colored and muslim.

          guess that makes ALL the difference.

          It's called the american dream because you have to be asleep to believe it. - G. Carlin

          by RabidNation on Thu May 12, 2005 at 12:28:22 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

        •  I agree in principle (none / 0)

          yet in "the madness of war", I have heard stories and I don't know if they are true, that the terrorists would booby trap dead bodies so that when a soldier rolled them over they would explode and kill the soldier.
          So if "in the madness of war" you saw you best buddy that had saved your life yesterday, blown to little bits, and knew he had a wife a children back home,  well you never know how it would affect you. You might get crazed with the insanity of it all.
           Not to say that what happened is right. Yet I can see these kinds of circumstances would drive a person nutso.

          I have never been on a battlefield and can not imagine the horror.

          Overthrow the Government ~Vote~

          by missliberties on Thu May 12, 2005 at 04:47:58 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

    •  Agree with this and above comment. (none / 1)

      Yes, his government sent him to invade another country illegally.
      Yes, his training was to ignore his humanity and the rules of war and kill mercilessly.
      Yes, he did so.
      Yes, he is a cold-blooded murderer.

Permalink | 11 comments