Daily Kos

Say it with me, Chicago: John Kass is an IDIOT!

Thu Jun 02, 2005 at 08:48:20 AM PDT

Did you know that Linda Tripp is as much a hero as Deep Throat? NO? Well, you obviously don't read the Trib's John Kass !

With so much attention rightfully being paid to the unmasking of W. Mark Felt as "Deep Throat," the source of Watergate fame, it was time for a cultural experiment.

So I typed "W. Mark Felt" into the news bar in Google and pressed the "enter" key.

Up came stories about Felt, the former senior FBI official who leaked information to the Washington Post, and articles from that symbiotic relationship that led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon.

But cultural experiments must be fair. Otherwise, angry Nixonians could accuse me of liberal elitism, or is that elite mainstream mediaism?

Follow me below the fold. . .

To add balance, I typed in "Linda Tripp" next to Felt's name and pressed the enter key.

Guess what happened? Not much.

No news articles put them in context Wednesday morning, as media spasms roiled over America, birthing thousands of legitimate stories about Felt's heroism and Nixon's crimes.

So Felt is the hero. And last I heard, Tripp was being ridiculed about her physical appearance, portrayed by the obese John Goodman on "Saturday Night Live."

"You should have predicted that," said Chicago attorney David Schippers, a Democrat who knows something about presidential abuse of power and impeachment.

"Felt is treated as a hero, and you know something? He was heroic," Schippers said. "He stood up to power. And Linda Tripp was heroic too. But they destroyed her."

That's right, John, because having meaningless sex with an intern is EXACTLY THE SAME as subverting the constitution and stealing a Presidential election.

More wisdom from the boy genius:

Tripp is the Pentagon employee who secretly taped conversations with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky, which led to impeachment proceedings against President Bill Clinton, a Democrat, who also abused power but did not resign.

Both presidents abused their power, lied and connived, and used the hammer of government to smash opponents. One had an unpopular war and inflation. The other was in office when people had fat wallets, as Americans were encouraged to not let foreign policy bother them too much.

While hushed reverential tones around Felt are obvious, Tripp has been ignored. When mentioned, she's ridiculed. Why?

"Because Felt put down a Republican president. And Linda Tripp nailed a Democratic president," Schippers said.

Just so there isn't any mistake, I think Felt is heroic for risking much to protect this country from presidential abuses of power.

He had a larger view about the country, and he had his own personal agenda, including his career and the direction of the FBI. No source is perfectly noble, no writers are purely objective, and those who argue otherwise are fools.

Yet America owes Felt and the Washington Post a debt. And if his family cashes in on his story, selling book and movie rights to scratch up college tuition for the grandchildren, so what?

Nixon used the Department of Justice and the Internal Revenue Service as weapons against his political enemies. Clinton dropped bombs on Iraq when he was impeached and had the leverage of hundreds of mysterious FBI files.

You're so right John, because, after all, Iraq didn't have any weapons of mass destruction, did they? Oh wait, I guess that throws a monkey wrench into your whole "W bombed Iraq to protect America," thing, doesn't it. Hmmmmmmm. I guess you're going to have to do some more creative thinking to get around that one. By the way, when you come up with anyone else who equates Monica Lewinsky and Watergate (no, not your buddies in the Young Republicans out in DuPage County, A REAL PERSON), please let me know. . .

And what about Tripp? "She's a hero to me, but she's not a hero to the media," Schippers said. "She was called a liar. She was ridiculed for the way she looked, for her appearance. She was savaged; she was made fun of on television. They destroyed her."

Felt was shielded, though he was an FBI official leaking privileged information. Tripp was warned by Clinton's people not to release the tapes. She had no protection, other than those tapes, Schippers said. She was publicly eviscerated and marked for revenge.

"If he's a hero, and he is, then she's a hero. They're both heroes. But they're treated differently, aren't they?"

My quibble is not with John's political party affiliation, but with his junior high-level political analysis. Geesh, this crap would have gotten D's from my high school history professor. I am amazed every day by this man's ability to retain his job in an otherwise pretty good newspaper.
Poll

Why does the Trib continue to employ John Kass

20%5 votes
4%1 votes
12%3 votes
45%11 votes
16%4 votes

| 24 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 17 comments

  •  In case (none / 0)

    you are so inclined to drop John Kass an email explaining the folly of his juvenile logic:

    jkass@tribune.com

    •  Why not Linda Tripp? (none / 0)

      I e-mailed Kass and explained to him it was Tripp's betrayal of her friendship with Monica Lewinsky that turned so many people off on her.

      Of course, the other factor is the one that you raised, that most Americans didn't find the Lewinsky-Clinton relationship to be all that heinous.

  •  Who was Felt supposed to go to? (none / 0)

     Bottom line: One took money and fame as the consequence of their action, the other didn't. No wonder one is treated worse than the other.
  •  John Kass is a hack (none / 0)

    I gave up reading his tripe ages ago. And he's supposed to be Royko's replacement?
  •  And the answer is (none / 0)

    They needed a Mike Royko replacement and they needed one now.

    Unfortunately, Kass is no Mike Royko -- as we learn every single day.

    •  Agree (none / 0)

      I actually didn't read Kass' column today, even after I was surprised that he wasn't joining in on the Conservative pile-on of Mark Felt.

      Royko had a bipartisan loathing of politicians, particularly those on the take.  Kass is a partisan hack.

      Please, don't send Kass angry emails.  He'll just turn them into fodder for a future "Liberals is stupid" column.

      Remember when we were against torture, before we were for it?

      by pshaw on Thu Jun 02, 2005 at 09:49:00 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  The advantage of a black-and-white mind! (none / 0)

    When there are only two possibilities, when there is no gradation, no scale possible, it is quite easy to equate Linda Tripp and Mark Felt.

    Problem is, the world is a lot more abundant than that.  Certainly, it is more colorful--and color does have an impact.

    Poor John Kass: it's not so much that he's an idiot, but that he's living in a meagre little world.

    It's too bad for the rest of us, however, when people like him start to have an impact on the real and varigated world.

  •  Write a LTTE (none / 0)

    explaining that this is ANOTHER EXAMPLE of the "false equality" journalism.  The fact is that Clinton was not a criminal, but Nixon was a criminal.  Thus, if you expose a criminal, you are a hero.  If you expose a non-criminal, you are just another right wing nazi false lying slut.

    "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." - H.L. Mencken

    by dataguy on Thu Jun 02, 2005 at 09:24:39 AM PDT

    •  Denver Media (none / 1)

      Diane DeGette, who took airfare from a group to speak at their meeting in San Diego, value $400, committed the same offense as Bob Beauprez, who took $21,000 from a group to ban the UN to cruise the Mediterranean.

      Move America Forward, who chose not to mobilize Republican voters, is the same as the Jefferson County GOP, who encouraged voters to vote absentee and then cast a provisional ballot at the polls, thereby getting two votes.

      You Democrats are such moral relativists.

  •  Julie unfair to Idiots! (none / 0)

    As an idiot, I dislike the comparison with John Kass, and I'm thinking of including you in my lawsuit against NOFX.

    Felt is no hero.  He was part of COINTELPRO an FBI program to infiltrate the Left.  The fact he turned Nixon in puts him on a level of Stalin, who defeated Hitler.

    •  Even jerks (none / 0)

      do something decent once in a while. I'm not glorifying Felt as a great friend of democracy, but I am honoring him for what he did to expose a president as a crook.

      All Linda Tripp did was tell everyone that her friend was sleeping with the boss.

  •  Just incredible, isn't it... (none / 0)

    Imagine equating a busybody with a personal axe to grind against someone who had not committed a crime with a whistle-blower with a conscience who could not go to their superiors because they were part of the wrong-doing...stunningly bad analogy!
  •  i heard john rothman on kgo say the same thing (none / 0)

    yesterday.  sometimes, i  think people try to hard to be "fair" that they lose light of reality (and i LIKE john, except for his original stance for the war in iraq).

    the difference between felt and trip is that felt did nothing for personal fame - he refused to be identified.  he uncovered "high crimes" and exposed them.

    tripp "set up" her friend and betrayed that friendship to "set up" the president.  she used a personal relationship (legal) between two adults) to try to bring down a president who had done nothing illegal - until he was "set up" by the lawyer using her tapes who asked him a personal question about a personalaffair that was legal.

    i have always felt that part of the reason clinton obsfucated and "split hairs" over what the definition of sexual relations was to protect lewinsky as well as his own reputation.

    what man of power wants to be seen as a cad, by the woman or the press...

    so felt: hero who gained nothing financially or politically

    trip:  creepy, opportunistic republican hack who got money, job security and republican adoration forever.

  •  Kass is a hack (none / 0)

    Last year he wrote the most juvinile crap, rumor in innuendo about John Kerry.  He gave voice to the Swift Boat liars.  

    When I called him on his lies in several emails - with specific references to where he got his facts wrong - he never retracted or wrote back.  Also, the OpEd page will publish almost no anti-Kass LTE's.

  •  Help from Tribune readers please (none / 0)

    I'm doing a series of diaries on a media campaign to get out the news on the Downing Street Minutes.  I'm thinking of making the Tribune one of the early targets in the campaign, because I think they might be open to appeals for more coverage and because their reporting gets wide circulation in other papers.

    I know they had a front-page story on DSM about two weeks ago.  Have they printed anything else on it?  Their web site has links to several further DSM articles from other papers, like the LA Times piece, but I have not figured out whether those actually appeared in print (I'm guessing not).  In other words, is the Trib already producing a series of articles on DSM?  Or has it just been that one article?

  •  It depends on what your definition of hero... is (none / 0)

    For honesty's sake, let me first say that I'm conservative (libertarian more like), but I come here because I don't want to get the bends from residing in an echo chamber filled with people who only think the same way I do. I rarely see something to agree with on dailykos, but I can agree, with qualifications, on part of what you've said, Julie.

    Felt saw a clearly criminal act that was trying to be covered up and helped to bring it to light. Given the notebooks and I.D.'s and money trails on the burglars it's not clear to me that the Post needed his help in the end, but it certainly made it easier for the editor to publish the stories and keep momentum and public opinion involved. I tried to have an open mind regarding some saying that he shouldn't have broken the law and his oaths, but the fact that the President was using his office in such a bullying and unlawful way negates any worries about the fine points of law. Felt clearly did the right thing. It can be argued that the repurcussions of Watergate had a very detrimental effect on the country, but we only have Nixon to blame for that. Felt's anonymity, however, does not argue for the title of hero. Correct action? Yes. Heroic? Why? He ran the show with Woodward and made sure that things couldn't be traced back to him so he took no chance at paying a price. In the event that it was traced to him what would have happend? He would have been fired. Nixon wasn't killing anyone. He was bribing, swearing at, and firing people. Still, the fact that Felt prevented the President from getting away with criminal acts can possibly be described as heroic simply because of the protection of the people and the office of President.

    Linda Tripp on the other hand knew she would be outed. Clinton's M.O. was to vilify those who made charges against him, as was currently being done to Paula Jones. Going up against the most powerful man in the world knowing he's going to be gunning for you truly takes spine. Here my conservative side shows when I state that I believe Clinton should have been removed from office. Although I think all Presidents shade the truth from time to time and that they all probably use some part of their position for political gain, what Clinton did was blatantly illegal. In this respect he was identical to Richard Nixon. He knowingly and forcefully tried to impede a legal investigation. The debate about lying over sex is immaterial to me. In a non-political citizen, lying about an affair might not seem like a big deal, but this was the pinnacle of our government sworn to uphold all the laws of the country. That made it a big deal.

    So, knowing that she would be castigated by the most powerful politicians in the world, Linda still helped to prove the President broke the law. Felt anonymously assisted an investigation of a criminal President that, to me, seems like it would have arrived at the same point eventually even without his help. If Felt had done his deeds publicly then his title of hero would be unimpeachable, if you'll pardon the pun. So, equating Tripp and Felt seems reasonable in this case.

Permalink | 17 comments