Daily Kos

To Iraqi Women: "Wear the veil or face death."

Tue Jul 19, 2005 at 08:44:33 AM PDT

Juan Cole flagged an article in Open Democracy today that reports on the escalating oppression of women in Iraq.

Women in Saddam's Iraq lived under a system that promised them freedom from gender-based oppression.

Even under Saddam's regime, women were free to choose whether to wear western-style dress and make-up or the black abaya. Many wore western dress in their jobs for government departments and in schools and universities.

...Snip...

Women were given the right to vote, receive an education, and work outside the home. Education was mandatory for both girls and boys up to the age of 16. Women were strongly encouraged to attend universities and acquire professional skills.

This was the starting point when the US invaded Iraq.  I'm not suggesting Iraq was a beacon of democracy.  It was far from it and women in Saddam's Iraq were not free from danger.

AI Under Saddam Hussein's regime, Iraqi women faced arrest; torture, including rape; and even execution because they were suspected of political opposition activities or simply because their husbands or male relatives were sought by the authorities.

The impetuous for abuse under Saddam was usually based on politics, not on gender.  Have things gotten any better?

While politically based intimidation and murder of women continues, today we see increasing threats to women based solely on their gender.

Insurgents and religious extremists use rape, acid and assassination to force Iraqi women to wear the veil - the symbol of submission, first signal of further repression to come. Many Iraqi women have never worn the scarf. Now, dead bodies of girls and women are found in rivers and on waste ground with a veil tied around the head, as a message.

...snip...

Similar attacks and threats have forced a number of women in the northern city of Mosul to give up paid work or to make sure they are accompanied to work by a brother, a male driver or a guard.

While these types of attacks and oppression were reported in some cities in Iraq over a year ago.  The oppression of women is now widespread.

Attacks have now expanded from certain geographic locations to the whole country. They have also spread to non-Muslim women.

Has Bush spoken out about the increasing oppression of women in Iraq?  Of course not.  To do so would be to admit his stated goal of bringing democracy to Iraq is failing.  To do so would require him to take responsibility for the mess he's created.

Tags: (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 16 comments

  •  ah, freedom.... dontcha just love it! (none / 0)

    And if this is bush's idea of freedom....  imagine what he has planned for us!  
  •  Sadly (4.00 / 3)

    I don't think many have this issue at the top of their page, and they should.

    If women in Iraq continue to lose rights it clearly demonstrates our lack of bringing "democracy" to the region.  And yet the MSM continues to ignore what is going on, and this issue is ignored even here on Kos (Rove and the SC taking over most of the discussion).

    Why is it that the rights of women are sent to the back?  Why is it that clearly half of the citizens of a country are targeted for less then full freedom and there is no outcry, there is nothing.

    I posted a diary   on this same thing over on MyLeftWing. This is a serious issue that is being ignored by far too many people.  

    AfterHoursStamper.blogspot.com

    by SanJoseLady on Tue Jul 19, 2005 at 03:50:49 AM PDT

  •  I have a friend from Mosul (none / 1)

    Who is an Assyrian Christian.  Back in the spring he told me about the fears his family had in Mosul.

    The women in his family no longer went out uncovered or unaccompanied.

    The trouble isn't only from fundamentalists, from what I gathered, he felt there were also people using the unrest/chaos to settle old scores or gain power through bullying/terrorizing the general populace.

    He said people were wishing for the "good old days" of Saddam.  Better the devil you know than the devil you don't.

    The Next Agenda "For Progressive Canadian Politics"

    by Bionic on Tue Jul 19, 2005 at 03:51:51 AM PDT

  •  Afghanistan too (4.00 / 2)

    The same thing has been happening in Afghanistan for years. To me, this is the best evidence that the war on terror has nothing to do with freedom.

    "So long as governments set the example of killing their enemies, private individuals will occasionally kill theirs." Elbert Hubbard (1856-1915)

    by sassy texan on Tue Jul 19, 2005 at 03:54:02 AM PDT

    •  And the worst part (4.00 / 2)

      is how this issue continues to be put on the back burner, even HERE on Kos.

      Women are denied the ability to live their lives freely in the Middle East, and in Iraq we have helped to create yet another country that will restrict women, and what do we hear? Silence.

      AfterHoursStamper.blogspot.com

      by SanJoseLady on Tue Jul 19, 2005 at 04:00:13 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  sad but true (none / 0)

        I have been noticing that too. Among some around here women's issue are either losing issues, too divisive, not important right now with a war going on, a wedge issue, etc.

        To me, equality of the sexes is the minimal requirement for any society and nothing resembling democracy can occur until that piece is in place.

        "So long as governments set the example of killing their enemies, private individuals will occasionally kill theirs." Elbert Hubbard (1856-1915)

        by sassy texan on Tue Jul 19, 2005 at 05:26:26 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  I don't think Kossaks are unconcerned (none / 0)

        about women's rights. It's just that the daily explosions in Iraq concentrate the mind wonderfully on how all Iraqis are in danger of being murdered or maimed everyday. Their country has been consigned to the ineffective role of flypaper by our own government's actions.

        I, for one, can't imagine how we are going to prevent the descent of Iraq into civil war. When this occurs, no Iraqi will have any rights except what he/she can enforce with an AK47.

        The plight of women will be one more aspect of what an utter failure the whole enterprise was doomed to be from the start.  

        John McCain says women shouldn't have the right to choose.

        by Cowalker on Tue Jul 19, 2005 at 05:27:46 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Secularist Saddam (none / 0)

    Saddam's government was nowhere near democracy.
    The Ba'ath party, however, was a secular, pan-Arab movement. Now, Saddam hijacked his revolution (as Stalin had hijacked his) but he didn't overturn it. The government ran a secular state. (If I read Woodward right, they even had Assyrians in high posts.)
    The strongest foes of Saddam were spokesmen for various seperate groups. The religious groups (either Sunni or Shia) were also advanced by the ouster of Saddam. And the veil is a religious requirement.

    "I'm not opposed to all wars; I'm opposed to dumb wars." -- Obama in 2002

    by Frank Palmer on Tue Jul 19, 2005 at 04:06:20 AM PDT

  •  I was unaware of these allegations (none / 0)

    I am still a bit more concerned about doing something about the assults in Dafur.

Permalink | 16 comments