Skip to main content

Jobs in America Volume III - Jobs Growth by Industry
Crossposted at My Left Wing
This is obviously the third in a series of explorations of Job data graciously published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, therefore here are the requisite links to the two previous posts, which might be of some interest.  Volume I covers Unemployment statistics.   Volume II looks at employment by age, the fastest growth in employment is in the over 75 crowd, now there is a surprise.  Perhaps Medicare D will change that.  Yeah right.

 Jobs in America - Volume  I (or Bush has lost 4.1 Million Jobs)

Screw the Young, they're just lazy Gamers anyway)

On to today's topic, Job Growth (or lack thereof) by industry.  Not quite as exciting as exposes of the criminal activities in the Royal Family in the Kingdom of Bribealot, but for those of us peon's who must work for a living, this is reasonably important stuff.  

Still with me?  There are pretty pictures below, really, I mean it.  Want some candy?

Ian Welsh over at BOPNews, had an interesting post on the "Conservative" Economy a couple of days ago, in which he compared the effects of the economic policies of the US and Canadian governments on domestic industries.  The analysis of data below firmly backs up his assertions.  I'd recommend reading the article.  Then of course, letting out a little pity sob for the future of our friends to the North (or South in my case), as they appear to be voting in a clone of Buscho.  But they are Canandians, eh, and I am a self centered Amuriken who thinks the world revolves around Paris Hilton's post lunch purge, so its back to the US data.

I'm sure when you read the paper or watch the news or have your brain in any way polluted by the statements and press releases from the Royal House of Bush (or it's minions) and see the endless repetition of the evidence of the "success" or "strength" of the economy, your first thought is "Can it really be true".

Of course not dummy.  Trust your instincts.  The job market has slowed its decline, but has certainly not grown under the reign of King George the II.  (Unless, of course, you are a right wing nutjob commentator for CNN) Perhaps, this is the natural outcome of having a King Anointed by 5 old twits in black robes.    

More critically, the decline continues in the sectors that will provide a foundation for future economic strength.  I of course refuse to back this up with anything, I'll just present the data and let you draw your own conclusions (not cat doodles).  

A note on methodology:  In order to eliminate the various effects of Unemployment and Labor Force participation classifications, all stats are presented in the form of the ratio of employment to population in the 16-65 age range.  This takes into account the increase in population over the reign of King Georgie and eliminates the political machinations, manipulation and mental masterbations which determine who is actually looking for a job.  See Jobs in America - Volume  I for details and comparisons of various methods. (of data analysis, not masterbation, you gutter minded librul blogger)

So here we go:

A look at the overall Market:

The overall portion of the population employed had declined by 4.8% since January 2001.  Service providing industries (including Government Employment) have not faired as poorly, employment has only declined by 2.5% and is beginning to improve a bit.  Employment in Goods Producing industries has declined by a whopping 15% and is showing no sign of improvement.  

First we'll look at the so called "Supersectors" then below will be more detailed breakdowns by Industry.  Bear with me, I know the coffee hasn't really kicked in yet.

Industries doing Well (sort of)
All the news is not truly depressing, there are some industries doing well, or at least climbing back to pre-Bribealot levels.


  • Education and Health Services is booming.  Up 7% from 2001 levels.  
  • Natural Resources and Mining have rebounded from a drop of nearly 10% to about even with January 2001, hooray for high fuel prices.
  • Construction employment is climbing back to 2001 levels, not unexpected given the housing "boom", but surprisingly stagnant.
  • Financial Services is holding reasonably steady, though not really growing.
  • The Leisure and Hospitality sector has grown from initial declines in 2002 and 2003, but is showing signs of weakness.
So that was the good news, now we'll work on increasing the sales of Zoloft.

Industry Sectors Performing like King George II thinking on the fly


  • Government and "Other Services" sectors initially increased but are dropping a bit.
  • The Professional and Business Services Sector initially fell by almost 10%, but is beginning to grow.
  • Trade, Transportation and Utilities have dropped by about 7% but seem to have stabilized in their decline.
  • The bottom fell out of the Information Services Sector with a decline of 20%, which has slowed but is still showing signs of further decline.
  • Of course my favorite, the Manufacturing Sector has dropped by over 22% and continues to decline.  The breakdowns below call into question the theory of "productivity gains" at least from an employment standpoint.
Of course, some of the losses in one sector are made up in gains in others, this however, is not always a "good thing".  We will explore this further in the next episode, Jobs in America Vol. IV - Income.  Plus as seen in the first chart, the overall portion of the population employed has declined significantly.

Now on to some detailed breakdowns.  Hit the potty, hit the Fridge, smoke'em if you got'em, check on the kids and let the dogs out.  I gotta make some more charts.  Which do you want first, the good news, or the bad?  
Screw all you gluttons for punishment, we're going to look at the good news first.  You'll have to wait until the bottom of the page for the bad news.

Booming Industrial Sectors(or kinda sorta at least showing some signs of life)


So Healthcare industries are no great surprise, yet Educational Services and Social Assistance Services are growing at a more rapid pace.  A fair chunk of this is demographics, we have a growing population of older Americans and a growing set of K-12 aged Americans.  There are reductions in post secondary education. If I get around to it I'll break those out as well.


Given the Housing "Boom" (for those optimists around), or the Housing "Bubble" (for those of us who see the bottom of the glass as very weak and are expecting it to break and let all the water out), the increase In Real Estate Services is no great surprise.  With all the debt Americans are carrying, the rise of Credit Intermediary Services is no real shocker.  All other segments of the Financial Services Sector are not doing quite so well.  Given the spew coming out of the right wing talking heads, I'd expect more of a recovery in the Securities and Commodities Sector, but it seems as though the current employment levels can handle the "phenomenal growth" in the markets.


Other than Food Services and Drinking Establishment all other Sectors declined early in the reign of King George II, but are more or less holding their own at this point.  Since this is probably the lowest paying Industry sector, too much growth here would be a very bad sign.  I, like all patriotic Amerikuns, am of course doing my best to forget who's running this country and by doing my part to support further growth in the Drinking Establishment sector, are you? (No? yorra pinko and ima gonna report youse to the ennsssssay, hey yur kinda hot wanna dance??)


Residential Construction is booming, no surprise there.  It would be logical to assert the declines in Commercial and Heavy Construction is due in part to workers shifting to residential, where there is more opportunity at this point.  Of course, in general, Residential Construction pays far less than Commercial, Industrial and Heavy Construction.  Not to mention this level of employment is dependent on a continuing boom.  Which I'm sure shows no signs of weakness whatsover and will continue until global warming reverses and hell freezes over.


The industries extracting natural resources for consumption are a mixed bag.  Support activities are increasing at a substantial pace, yet employment in the actual extraction work has remained stagnant after an initial drop early in the reign of the Chimpster.  Much of the stagnation in Coal and Non-Coal mining is due to productivity increases.  Stagnation in Oil and Gas is most likely due to reserve depletion.  Significant declines in logging are due to steep declines in Wood product manufacturing and limited reserves.  

Ok, enough good news, now let's light up some clove cigarettes, put on black lipstick and bemoan our lost teenage angst by looking at the industries in decline.  Please join me on the dark side.

Manufacturing

Not exactly doing well under the Royal Primate's tutalage.

First the "Woody" Industries (pervert)

Perhaps we really are moving to a paperless society after all.  Furnitureless too it seems.

Now on to "Textiles and Apparel" (or for the perv's out there, Coverings for the woody)

Not exactly a career choice I would recommend.  Something about sweatshops in the third world and forced labor and prostitution in the Marianas.  It is truly amazing how well this industry has fared under George II.

Process Industries

Going Gangbusters, they've only lost half the workforce as the apparel sectors.  The Primary Metals decline is somewhat surprising since steel is selling quite well at the moment.  Must be productiity gains, union busting and a lack of investment.  Love that supply side theory.

Food, Beverage, Tobacco and Misc

Wow, not even a 20% decline in the bunch, must be hard to import some of the perishable stuff.  (I wonder what the #'s would like if the BLS included the "Wacky Tabaccy" industry)

Ok, so those were all some "Traditional" Industries, lets look at some high tech manufacturing, it'll be much better.  (Notice how the chart backgrounds are the "Rose" color)

Oops, never mind.

Ok, so High Tech manufacturing isn't going to save us, lets look at Transportation, I'm sure this will give all the union busters out there a lot of ammunition.

What, just about a 10% drop in Light Vehicle manufacturing, I must have partaken in too much of the the output of the "wacky tabaccy" industry.  Actually it does make some sense.    It costs a lot to ship cars across the ocean, plus logistically its very difficult to offshore and entire operation.  Auto parts, on the other hand, are easier to offshore.  That of course does not explain the dramtic drop in heavy truck manufacturing. To be honest, I'm not sure why this has occured.

Other transportation manufacturing industries are not quite so healthy.  Especially rail.

Ok, so that was the worst of it, this is the information age after all, lets look on the bright side and see how all this innovation in the "New Economy" is going to lift us out of the doldrums and create a new utopia.

Information Sectors
These are combination of what I randomly classify as Traditional and New Economy.  Traditional is generall paper based or Broadcast, New would be the internets.

Well dem internets ain't gonna do it folks.  

Telecommunications ain't gonna do it either.

So, now that we've burst the New Economy Bubble, lets look at Professional and Business Services.  This must be stronger as it's a knowledged based sector, right?

Professional Services is not doing as poorly as some of the rest of the sectors, however I would not consider it to be showing stellar performance.  

At this point my eyes are crossed and my head is fried.  I'll just blow off the other sectors for now.  (Trade, Transport, Utilities, Government and Other Services)  No big surprises there anyway.  

Next week, wages.

Originally posted to BTower on Thu Jan 19, 2006 at 10:17 AM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Wow... (none)
    Republican party folks are really BOOSTING the legal services sector!  See? Republicans are good for the economy!

    Will wait as patiently as I can for the wage diary!

    You make economics fun!!!!

    LetsFight. re handle: Fight the radical right is the sentiment!

    by letsfight on Thu Jan 19, 2006 at 10:35:30 AM PST

    •  Wages (none)
      Will be interesting, at the overall level, they have been stagnant when indexed for inflation.  Oddly enough they peaked when Unemployment was at its highest in the summer of 2003.
      •  Yes.... (none)
        And you might consider showing a chart (as a sidenote) about the the lack of rise in wages since the 70's.  Take that negative number and add it to the lack of even cost of living rises, and you can see why we are NOW a 3rd world nation.

        LetsFight. re handle: Fight the radical right is the sentiment!

        by letsfight on Thu Jan 19, 2006 at 11:30:56 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  Good job Btower... (none)
    great analysis, appreciate it...

    You should steal Jerome's, Bonddads or Stirling's id to post these, you'll always make the recommended list then!

    Thanks again for the work!

  •  Question... (none)
    At last glance the 'labor pool' is estimated to be 209 million...did you use this figure or the lower 'in the workforce' figures that ignore almost 70 million working aged citizens?

    Great diary...it takes a lot to slug through the numbers and get results.

    Recommend!

    Parties divide, movements unite.

    by Gegner on Thu Jan 19, 2006 at 11:55:16 AM PST

    •  Methodology (none)
      For the overall #'s I took the ratio of:
      (Non Inst. Civilian Population aged 16-65)/(Employed)

      in Jan 2001 and set that as the index base for "full employment".  In Jan 01 the Ratio of employed to working age stood at 76.2%.  Today it is 74.3%

      For each sector, I took the Employment level in Jan 2001, projected the theoretical "full employment" quantities for each month based on growth of the working age population and compared that to the BLS reported #'s.

  •  For the love of... (none)

    ...seriously, what are you trying to do here?  Basically, claim correlation is causation.  What's more, it's a false correlation because you've artifically chopped the statistics off during Bush's reign.


    You can see the trends for industries since 1995 here.  There it's clear that most of them are continuations of much earlier trends.  The main trends that do vary during Bush's term are Manufacturing and Information, which trend downwards right as the economy collapsed in 2000, prior to Bush coming to office or passing an major economic legislation.

    •  For the love of..... (none)
      Of course I started in Jan 01 and some trends were in motion prior to George's Coronation.  When do you propose I start?  I'm looking at the performance of this administration I should look at the record of this administration, yes?.  

      When does the chimp become responsible, If we listen to the talking heads, they all start in 3Q '03 and say everything has improved since then.  Are they not "artificially" cropping the data.  

      Personally, I think the Chimp himself was responsible for a big chunk of the collapse in late 00 and 01.  He was making statements to the effect that the economy was going to tank to justify pushing his "stimulus" package of tax cuts.  

  •  Great Job (none)
    Good analysis.  I wish these would make it to the traditional media.  It'd be interesting to see if the GOP could spin this and keep convincing people that the economy and jobs are up.

    By the way, I was a little worried before about getting my degree in IT and now I'm even more worried.  Does anyone think its still a good idea?

    "I remember when the answer seemed so clear. We had never lived without or tasted fear." The Monkees

    by kisler1224 on Thu Jan 19, 2006 at 12:09:37 PM PST

  •  You've ignored the best-performing category! (none)
    That would be the 'Picking The Right Parents' category. Almost every member of this category who properly selected rich parents are doing very well, thank you.

    Bush himself is a perfect example of how even a halfwit coward can make it big in America by simply choosing his parents well. If more people followed Dubya's example, we wouldn't have all this pointless moaning about burger-flipping jobs. Everyone knows those kinds of menial jobs are intended for illegal immigrants anyway.

    •  Damn (none)
      I knew I was missing a very important Industry.  Trust Fund Babies are a very important segment of our society.  After all, they do chose the King.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site