I'm glad to see what you've all done here to promote the "Fighting Dems" - veterans running for Congress. Over the last couple days, I've been reminded - just reading the news - why it matters that we change not just partisan control of Congress, but that we elect veterans to serve there. This Administration has a habit of treating veterans and members of the military as terrific backdrops for their speeches, but they don't listen to them about what they're seeing on the ground as they serve (witness the body armor ordeal,) they ignore the lessons military men and women learned in uniform (just ask General Shinseki,) and, judging by Bush policies they certainly don't pay any attention to their needs when they come home (they tolerate billion dollar shortfalls in veterans funding.)
I think electing Iraq war veterans in 2006 is the single most important thing we can do to change that. Here's why. Stars and Stripes reported that "Seventy-two percent of troops on the ground in Iraq think U.S. military forces should get out of the country within a year." Imagine that. No matter what you think the right course is in Iraq, what does it tell you that many American troops see that a long term, massive military presence in Iraq with no end in sight isn't the answer? In that article - which I hope everyone will read - the man who organized the survey makes an important point: "there are those in the U.S. who will speak for the troops, so there is a real value in seeing what they are actually saying." That's what counts here. To hear the Administration and their Republican allies talk, anyone who has a different view than George Bush is lacking in patriotism and doesn't support the troops. Remember freshman GOP Congresswoman Jean Schmidt who invoked our troops in smearing Jack Murtha? I wonder what Jean Schmidt would have to say confronted by the informed and expert opinions of soldiers home from Iraq -- whatever they believe. The Republicans might just be forced to debate the merits of the issue! Talk about throwing a wrench into the partisan smear machine these Republicans rely on to stifle debate. That's why I want people like Jean Schmidt to have to stand face to face on the floor of Congress and be forced to debate a veteran who's been there. It will elevate the dialogue in our country, it will change the voices in the conversation.
That's what this is all about. Imagine if the voices of today's veterans weren't just reflected on the front page of Stars and Stripes, but in votes and voices on the floor of Congress. That's what I'm committed to getting done.
I know something about that. I took plenty of kicks and cuts for it in 2004, but I was part of a veterans movement after Vietnam that didn't just speak out against the war, but made sure vets got help for PTSD, that we got education benefits, and improved V.A. healthcare for our brothers. I know the difference our veterans movement made both in changing the course of that war, and in vets fighting for vets. Look at what Max Cleland did as V.A. Secretary less than ten years after he lost three limbs for his country. I'm proud of the way we spoke out. We didn't let Richard Nixon define patriotism. I remember when we were speaking out against the Vietnam war policy, someone yelled at the vets marching from Arlington Cemetery: "you should support the troops." One of those veterans shouted back: "Lady, we are the troops." That's what these Iraq war veterans can do today - because they are the troops, they can speak with a special moral authority and I'm convinced they can change the way this place works.
So, I'm glad to see what you're doing to support these veterans, and I'm going to keep you up to date on the initiatives I'm leading to elect veterans to Congress and change the face of this institution. I'm starting today with a push to raise money for Tammy Duckworth, Patrick Murphy, and Joe Sestak, and I'm going to expand that effort. I learned in 1972 what these guys on the other side will do when a veteran runs for Congress challenging powerful people. Trust me, I know what Richard Nixon did then, and I know what Karl Rove and his minions were up to in 2004. We now know that no matter how outrageous the lie, there are some who will give the attackers a platform and in the new world we live in there are no more "gatekeepers"-- no more Edward R. Murrow in Good Night and Good Luck! -- to separate fact from fiction. Vets need to fight for vets, and the grassroots need to mobilize behind that effort. So I'm committed to do whatever I can to guarantee these veterans running today have all the ammunition they need to fight back, defeat the attacks, and get to Washington and change the way this city treats our soldiers -- guaranteeing we get Washington back in the business of keeping faith with veterans. Rock and roll.