Skip to main content

This statue is not now in London but was originally intended to be erected in Parliament Square in 1920 as a gift from the American people. It is a replica of one in Cincinnati by George Barnard. Dubbed the "stomach ache statue". as the position of the hands suggested Lincoln was suffering from colic, the American Commission of Fine Arts considered it insufficiently reverent for Parliament Square. A copy of one by Augustus Saint-Gaudens was erected in London and this one presented to Manchester.  

The reasons behind the presentation form one of the least acknowledged chapters in American history. Without the actions of the people it recognises, it is quite possible that the Confederacy would have successfully withdrawn from the Union.

(Cross posted from European Tribune)

By the 1850s, the Lancashire cotton mills, with Manchester at their hub, were the centre of the world's industry. Something like 90% of all cotton cloth was produced in the region, almost exclusively using the longer American fibres. The importance of this trade and other factors did not make the ruling classes in Britain sympathetic to the northern cause as this  history of Victoria's reign originally published about 100 years ago makes clear:

In 1861 the Civil War broke out in America between the Northern and Southern States of the Union. The matters in dispute between them were many and various, but the most important point at issue was the question of slavery. The English people generally took the side of the South, partly from a supposed community of feeling, and partly from a jealousy of the United States and a wish to see her dismembered. This feeling was intensified by the capture of two Southern envoys while under the protection of the British flag. There was danger of war breaking out, but the Northern States submitted to an ultimatum and returned the prisoners.

The affair of the "Trent," as this dispute was called from the name of the ship in which the envoys were sailing, was the last public question in which Prince Albert, now for some time called the Prince Consort, was engaged...

The American war affected England in two ways. First, the ordinary supply of cotton to her manufacturing districts was cut off, and the great distress, known as the "cotton famine" was felt in Lancashire.... The other trouble was of longer duration. A ship called the "Alabama"* was fitted out from an English dockyard, notwithstanding the protest of the American Ambassador, with the object of making war on American commerce, in the interests of the South-ern States. Americans felt that the negligence shown in not stopping this vessel expressed only too clearly the sympathies of England. They could not at this time do anything to prevent or to avenge the wrong, but when the war was over a feeling of bitterness was left, which nearly led to an open rupture, and was with difficulty appeased.

Unsaid in this is the wider proposal to break the northern blockade of the southern ports by using the Royal Navy to attack the Union fleet. The North had its own groups of supporters, notably the Anti-Slavery movement and the radicals. Manchester had long been a centre for radical politics. In 1815 the "Peterloo Massacre" involved the deaths of protesters demanding the reform of what had become a corrupt system of "rotton boroughs" in which parliamentary representation had not been redistributed to take account of the huge population growth in the manufacturing cities.

By 1862 the position in the cotton mills had become dire. Stocks had run out and only very limited supplies could be sourced elsewhere. Mills had closed and the workers were unemployed. To alleviate the suffering soup kitchens had been opened. Sewing classes were organised for the young women, partly to give them skills but mostly to avoid them entering prostitution to live. Many of the mill owners were from Puritan or "non-conformist" families who had sympathies themselves with the anti-slavery movement and helped organise the appeals to run these reliefs. An alternative to the poverty was also offered in the form of emigration to the US.

The Cotton Famines were not only a shortage of raw materials, they involved true suffering. In some areas infant mortality reached 50% as malnutrition affected those least able to cope. In the middle of this suffering the working men (and women) of Manchester held a meeting in December 1862 in the "Free Trade Hall", built on part of the Peterloo Massacre site. They resolved to support the North in the American Civil War and sent an address to Lincoln, in the full knowlege that it would mean further suffering or even death for their families. These actions helped turn opinion in Parliament and the possible Navy intervention was called off. Lincoln himself acknowledged the debt the Union owed to the cotton workers in his response of January 1863 "To the Working Men of Manchester". Which is quoted in part on the statue's plinth (although "men" has been changed to "people")

I have understood well that the duty of self-preservation rests solely with the American people; but I have at the same time been aware that favor or disfavor of foreign nations might have a material influence in enlarging or prolonging the struggle with disloyal men in which the country is engaged.  A fair examination of history has served to authorize a belief that the past actions and influences of the United States were generally regarded as having been beneficial toward mankind.  I have, therefore, reckoned upon the forbearance of nations.  

Circumstances--to some of which you kindly allude--induce me especially to expect that if justice and good faith should be practised by the United States, they would encounter no hostile influence on the part of Great Britain.  It is now a pleasant duty to acknowledge the demonstration you have given of your desire that a spirit of amity and peace toward this country may prevail in the councils of your Queen, who is respected and esteemed in your own country only more than she is by the kindred nation which has its home on this side of the Atlantic.

I know and deeply deplore the sufferings which the workingmen at Manchester, and in all Europe, are called to endure in this crisis. It has been often and studiously represented that the attempt to overthrow this government, which was built upon the foundation of human rights, and to substitute for it one which should rest exclusively on the basis of human slavery, was likely to obtain the favor of Europe.  Through the action of our disloyal citizens, the working-men of Europe have been subjected to severe trials, for the
purpose of forcing their sanction to that attempt.  Under the circumstance, I cannot but regard your decisive utterances upon the question as an instance of sublime Christian heroism which has not been surpassed in any age or in any country.  It is indeed an energetic and inspiring assurance of the inherent power of truth and of the ultimate and universal triumph of justice, humanity, and freedom.  I do not doubt that the sentiments, you have expressed will be sustained by your great nation; and, on the other hand, I have no hesitation in assuring you that they will excite admiration, esteem, and the most reciprocal feelings of friendship among the American people.

This can be seen as the start of the "special relationship" between Britain and the US. Without the personal sacrifice of the Lancashire cotton workers, the South would have regained the income from cotton sales and would have been able to pursue to Civil War longer and perhaps even become independent. So when the right wing nutters start kicking off about the entry of the USA into the two World Wars and how it "saved Europe", it can be useful to remind them that without the people of Europe and Manchester in particular, there might not be a United States today.

Originally posted to londonbear on Sun Mar 12, 2006 at 02:38 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I think you've sort of omitted (none)
    the part about the British government negotiating with the Confederacy, toying for the first couple of years with siding with the South, and buying up at inflated prices all the cotton that southerners could get out past the Northern blockade.

    Not to say that some in Britain did not agitate on behalf of the North. Just that the British record on this war was decidedly mixed.

    •  as was the u.s.'s (none)
      abolition was an afterthought - the civil war was about economics, first and foremost.  that one of the economic models in question was dependent on slavery is almost incidental.

      weather forecast

      The palaces of kings are built upon the ruins of the bowers of paradise. - Paine

      by Cedwyn on Sun Mar 12, 2006 at 02:59:12 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  sure (none)
        except that I'm not sure that even contemporaries could have told you what that war was about. I think you would have gotten scores of different explanations, many of them foolish (or at least trivial) but earnestly believed (just as with the 'reason' for invading Iraq).

        "Alea jacta est." George Bush, January 20, 2001

        by smintheus on Sun Mar 12, 2006 at 03:15:02 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  Thank you, Thank you, Thank you (none)
    I love the idea of  statue stories. Well done. What a great idea, please continue!

    It is so important for all of us to read various points of view. After all, Demos means the People. You are right about the people of Europe supporting the USA at various times. History has so much to teach us.

    This summer I was surprised to find a framed letter from Benjamin Franklin written on behalf of the US government in the Chateau de Cheverny to express his appreciation for support at the time of the American Revolution. It is just on the left as you enter. How appropriate.

    •  Thanks (4.00)
      This is the second in an occasional series I am doing as a lighter weekend relief of Eurotrib. The first is about a rather more famous statue in central London though there is a sort of linking thread.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site