Skip to main content

Where have the mainstream churches of America disappeared to? I grew up in a mainly judeo-christian nation that was focused on the basic rules of how to live a good life. It was a flawed society but one that was trying to do the right thing and was repeating the kinds of lessons that could be appealed to make change. There were many wrongs to be righted but the scriptures were used to move in the right direction for the most part.

Foremost of these teachings were many lessons that perfectly match what we espouse as Liberals and Progressives: tolerance, caring for each other,love for one's neighbor despite the differences that naturally exist among us including those from practicing other religions, making sure that those that need to be cared for are:  feed the hungry and shelter the homeless, be honest in all dealings and many, many more.

How did these Neochristians suddenly silence the moderate churches that are still leading their flocks to do the righ thing? It really is a mystery.

In many ways it follows the great changes in our society that has allowed us to fragment not just into marketing targets but into real communities seperated by geography that can gather quickly and powerfully in national terms. The internet is part of this but there is more.

As intolearant as many of these new fundamentalist churches are in terms of biblical interpretation relative to each other, their collective leadership has been able to unify nationally mainly to fight gay marriage, women's right to chose and the role of the church within the state. These basic ideas have driven marginal and major new churches into a force that now controls the Republican party and cowers the Democratic Party into trying to figure out how to be true to its precepts and win elections.

We actually stand for the fundamental judeo-christian principles that built western society and allowed the development of liberal democracy that the President uses to such effect to cover the errors of his adminsitration. We need to change the discussion. Stop playing Defense! Our leaders need address the gap that exists at present not be responding on their favorite topics (because their minds can't be changed and they are not our voters) but by going back to the well that truly feeds what is great in our society we can gather those with still open minds on how we can be greater as a people not because of our military but by the force of our human values.
Our judeo-christian values stress caring not only for other humans but for our world. The indictment of Republican policies was put no better than by Ansel Adams after meeting President Reagan.I agree with Mr. Adams because the battle is one to preserve and enhance all the great things that make this country worth defending.

In 1983, Adams met with President Reagan, and not to deliver a photograph. He was a vocal critic of Reagan's rollbacks on environmental protection and preservation of wild areas. He said Reagan's land policies were ones of ''rape, ruin, and run!" According to Adams, had the nation been under the vision in the 1930s of Reagan's infamous Interior Secretary James Watt, Kings Canyon National Park would today ''look like part of the outskirts of Las Vegas."

After Adams told Playboy magazine in 1983, ''I hate Reagan," an embarrassed White House had the beloved photographer sit with Reagan for nearly an hour. Adams left unimpressed, borrowing from Oscar Wilde to say, ''They know the price of everything and the value of nothing."

One can only guess what sparks would fly if Adams, who died in 1984, could witness President Bush's resurrection of Reagan's rape, ruin, and run.


Originally posted to What were you thinking on Thu Apr 06, 2006 at 10:27 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site