Note to Nancy Pelosi: THIS is what is called taking the gloves off. Every Dem on Capitol Hill should be demanding to get on TV today and driving this phrase home: "Leaker-in-Chief. Leaker-in-Chief. Leaker-in-Chief." Say it until you're blue in the face. If all any Dem talks about is the leaker-in-chief for the next week, then guess what, the traditional media will have no choice but to cover it as a big story. When your opponent is down, don't wait for him to get back up, hit 'em with the effing chair!
http://www.rawstory.com/...
"If the disclosure is true, it's breathtaking. The President is revealed as the Leaker-in-Chief.
"Leaking classified information to the press when you want to get your side out or silence your critics is not appropriate.
"The reason we classify things is to protect our sources - those who risk their lives to give us secrets. Who knows how many sources were burned by giving Libby this 'license to leak'?
"If I had leaked the information, I'd be in jail. Why should the President be above the law?
"The President has the legal authority to declassify information, but there are normal channels for doing so. Telling an aide to leak classified information to the New York Times is not a normal channel. A normal declassification procedure would involve going back to the originating agency, such as the CIA, and then putting out a public, declassified version of the document.
"I am stunned that the President won't tell the full the Intelligence Committee about the NSA program because he's allegedly concerned about leaks, when it turns out that he is the Leaker-in-Chief."