Skip to main content

Before I get started here's a grain of salt: I didn't give much, my soapbox is only $10 tall. But this was my first political contribution and it comes at a time when I don't have a lot of money.

I wanted to share with you why I decided to give to Ned Lamont.

First, I believe very strongly that politics is about representation. Politicians have a duty to represent the views of their state on key votes in the house and senate. In my view, no Democrat has been so tin-eared to the heartbeat of his constituents than Joe Lieberman.

Secondly, I am strongly against the war, and I know Connecticut is solidly against it too. From the way Lieberman behaves, you would think CT was the state that had the idea to invade. There are many issues that I can tolerate dissidence from my politician on, but at this moment being realistic about the situation in Iraq is the kind of wisdom that saves lives. Instead of demonstrating this wisdom, Lieberman sounds like a DoD spokesman, eagerly singing the most supportive rhetoric of a dangerously failed policy. The situation in Iraq is not one that can justify Lieberman's blind loyalty, yet he remains blind.

So I'm no fan of Lieberman, but that doesn't explain why I chose to contribute. It was this article that convinced me. It showed me that Lamont was running a serious campaign, and serious about winning. The author makes an good point that I'll cite here:

One sign of his maturity as a candidate is that Lamont does not sound desperate for votes. When one caller, proclaiming the virtue of her own candor, started what sounded like an anti-Semitic rant against Lieberman, Lamont quickly dissociated himself from his ugly-minded supporter and launched into a paean to Lieberman's patriotism. In this era of brutal political combat, it was a rare moment. It sounded like the sort of exchange that, if repeated in enough forums, will transform the race for the nomination from interesting to close, maybe even stunning.

I couldn't agree more. I don't need politicians to represent my hostility towards Bush or his policies, I do need them to represent my views. Speaking of which, here's the words of Lamont himself from his website:

I am running for the US Senate because we deserve a Senator who will stand up for Connecticut and stand up for our progressive democratic values. Rather than spending hundreds of millions of dollars a day in Iraq, it is time for America to refocus on issues back home: fixing our healthcare system, upgrading our schools, and rebuilding our aging infrastructure. We will start winning in Iraq as the Iraqis take control of their own destiny, just as America has to start investing again in our own future.

Lamont speaks against Iraq in reasonable terms, in doing so he is making argument on the issue acceptable. It is clear that he puts a premium on crafting an acceptable progressive message to match CT's blend of red and blue.

I think a lot of people mistake the desires of liberals and believe we want our politicians to be hostile for us when we simply want them to represent our concerns and stand solidly in opposition to things that we are solidly against. But on the other side of the coin, I feel that many folks believe that simply being hostile will cause political change.

I wanted to make at least a symbolic contribution to Lamont so I could speak against Lieberman as an actual supporter of alternative. And I wanted to write about my support here to encourage others to take the plunge and donate even a small amount to their home state alternative to our corrupt government. This way we can both vocalize our criticisms and be known for our support.

There are many races happening this year. I happen to think that Lamont vs. Lieberman is more about the soul of the Democratic party than any other race. But seeing as my soapbox is only $10 tall, I'll step down now.

Thanks for listening!

Originally posted to KingJames on Fri Apr 07, 2006 at 07:12 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I'm a former CT resident (9+ / 0-)

    and I care about the politics of my old home.

    Just say 'NO' to torture enabling judges.

    by KingJames on Fri Apr 07, 2006 at 07:13:01 PM PDT

  •  we need ned lamont (0+ / 0-)

    dump joe lieberman

    Please visit our website! www.futuredems.8k.com

    by FutureDemocrats on Fri Apr 07, 2006 at 07:14:53 PM PDT

  •  To contribute . . . (4+ / 0-)

    . . . just go to my ActBlue page (link below). :)

    Thanks!

    A liberal is a conservative who's been hugged. http://www.actblue.com/...

    by raatz on Fri Apr 07, 2006 at 07:23:04 PM PDT

  •  Lamont is the real deal... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    aldon, Prison4Bushco

    He is a classic citizen politician with the smarts, attitude, and background to give CT and the US what it needs; a thoughtful progressive who understands what a mess the Bush-Lieberman team has gotten us into and is willing to lay himself on the line as part of the solution.

  •  you've convinced me (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    aldon, Prison4Bushco

    I will donate $10 to Lamont as well.

    Who's going to join me?  

    Don't be a chicken, stand up for the guy who believes in what you believe in (even if you only have a few bucks).

    ;)

  •  Every little bit helps (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    aldon, Prison4Bushco

    The political importance of the netroots lies, largely, in millions of $10 contributions like this.

    Bill McKibben's review of Markos and Jerome's "Crashing the Gates" in the New York Review of Books highlights the importance of netroots fund-raising -- money talks, and gives outsiders and insiders an obvious way to measure whether what we're doing here makes a difference.

    Thanks and congratulations, King James. I don't live in Connecticut, but you've inspired me to make my first, likewise small contribution to Lamont.

    We've helped some winners and more losers, but we have always given real Democrats more resources to oppose the Worst President Ever and his Congressional allies.

    Like Lieberman.

    The Republicans want to cut YOUR Social Security benefits.

    by devtob on Fri Apr 07, 2006 at 09:41:29 PM PDT

  •  Like you ~really~ had to tell us *why* ...? (0+ / 0-)

    ;)

    Shmoementum!

    /go Ned

    ------------------------------
    Trying To Maintain Rationality
    econatheist's bloggity blog blog

    by EconAtheist on Fri Apr 07, 2006 at 09:52:10 PM PDT

  •  This diary has a great title! ;-) (0+ / 0-)
  •  I despise diaries like this! (0+ / 0-)

    Image hosting by Photobucket

    Will you people please stop!!!!! I can't take it any more!!!

  •  The really big contributions (0+ / 0-)

    (Full disclosure, I'm on Ned's Staff)

    Let me start off by thanking you for your contribution and your post.  I think it reflects part of the reason I'm so excited about Ned's campaign.

    In the next few days, we will see reports about the contributions that Lieberman and Lamont received during the first quarter.  We will see that Lamont received contributions from over 4000 individuals.  They are small contributions from across the country, but they are the contributions of regular people getting involved in democracy.

    If Lieberman's previous reports are any indication, we'll see a much smaller number of high dollar donors.

    So, what is the really big contribution?  It is KingJames giving $10 bucks and encouraging others to do the same.  It is raatz encouraging people to donate through his ActBlue page.  It is ctkeith and his friends showing up at events everywhere in Connecticut talking about Ned Lamont.

    Getting regular people involved in the democracy of this country.  That is the really big contribution, and I thank all of you.  Keep up the good work and keep spreading the word

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site