Skip to main content

Cross-posted at the Writing on the Wal.

The historian Nelson Lichtenstein begins his book State of the Union by looking at an employment application from Burger King.  He takes special note of language on it that suggests that the restaurant will not discriminate against people on the basis of race, gender...you know the drill.  In fact, Lichtenstein writes:

The overwhelming majority of workers, employers, and politicians believe that the government has a right to insist that active discrimination not take place against anyone covered by Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights or those many statutes that followed in its train.  This seems so commonplace and commonsensensible, that we forget the radical character of this law.  If you own a restaurant or a factory or a motel or run a college, you can't make use of the property as you wish.  The state mandates you to hire, fire, promote, and otherwise deal with your employees or clients according to a set of rules laid down in Washington and refined by the EEOC [Equal Employment Opportunity Commission] and the courts.

Think about it.  Organize a union at your place of employment and they'll fire you instantly and get away with it, but they can't make your life miserable just because you're African American.  Except at Wal-Mart.  They get to have their cake and eat it too.  Lawyer George Lenard summarizes the case of Canady v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.:

African-American plaintiff claiming racially discriminatory termination and racially hostile work environment alleged his immediate supervisor made the following discriminatory remarks:
*    Referred to himself as a "slave driver" when describing his reputation as a manager.
*    Asked plaintiff, "What's up, my nigga?"
*    Referred to plaintiff as "lawn jockey."
*    Said all African Americans look alike.
*    Said plaintiff's skin color seemed to wipe off onto towels.

And Wal-Mart won the case on a summary judgment.  

When I first wrote about this case, I asked, "Does Wal-Mart think it's OK to call African Americans lawn jockeys?"  Let me simplify it further.  Forget about the law.  You want to know why this case is important?  Wal-Mart sided with the supervisor instead of Myron Canady.   That means they're part of the problem rather than the solution.

Does this mean Wal-Mart is a racist company?  Does the fact that Wal-Mart is the defendant in the biggest class action gender discrimination suit in American history (indeed the biggest class action suit of ANY kind in American history) mean that the company is sexist?  I don't think so.  These cases aren't about racism or sexism per se; they're about power.  Wal-Mart sided with the supervisor because if they support workers over managers on anything their whole tyrannical employment system might topple over.  If employees realize that they have a right to be treated with basic human dignity, they could actually demand the right to organize and Wal-Mart can't possibly have that.  They'll tell you a union would add to the price of their cheap plastic crap and fatty meat, but we all know that's just a cover story.  The real reason Wal-Mart doesn't want a union is that the Walton family would then be a little less obscenely rich.  If some idiot manager wants to use his power over his employees to say, "What's up, my nigga?" or hold business meetings at a Hooters restaurant, then that's a small price to pay from the company's perspective.

This is precisely why Wal-Mart's recent embrace of diversity is so inadequate.  The presence of women and minority executives in the company's boardrooms are worth very little if Wal-Mart's money-grubbing culture stays the same.  As James Baldwin explained more eloquently than I've ever seen it before:

[T]he inequalities suffered by the many are no way justified by the rise of the few.  A few have always risen - in every country, every era, and in the teeth of regimes which can by no stretch of the imagination be thought of as free.  Not all of these people, it is worth remembering, left the world better than they found it.

Indeed, let's not forget that it was a female executive, Susan Chambers, who wrote the now-infamous memo that advised Wal-Mart to discourage unhealthy people from working there.  That makes her part of the problem, irrespective of her gender.

Diversity doesn't cost Wal-Mart a cent.  Empowering employees would be a whole different ballgame and Wal-Mart won't do that on its own.  That's why Wal-Mart workers need a union.  Otherwise, all our civil rights will be in jeopardy when Wal-Mart's priorities and practices spread through the rest of the economy and the words enshrined on Lichtenstein's Burger King application become just as meaningless as the right to organize.

JR

Originally posted to JR Monsterfodder on Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 06:58 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site