Skip to main content

Cross posted at http://thehenrygeorgeblog.blogspot.com/

The news came out yesterday from both gubernatorial camps about all these property tax cut proposals.

Firstly, I want to say that I agree with the folks at Upstate Blogs except they also seem to be endorsing the Faso plan as well, which has more problems for the State then Spitzers. What Faso is proposing is New York prop 13. The reason why taxes go up on "property" is because the costs of running government become greater each year. As urban sprawl continues unabated the cost for the community to support one person increases. Taxes need to go up! A few days ago I heard a similar proposal on public radio and when asked where they (the local governments) would get the money, the politician replied "the state". You know, I remember when I was a kid and I wanted a video game. I asked my Mom for it but we didn't have a lot of money so I said "write a check!"

(cont)

Spitzer's seem a bit shy on the details. Faso's will cap the increase by either the rate of inflation or (I think, his press release doesn't give details) 4% per year, which ever is lower. I wonder how he came up with that number? Probably Astrology.

The property tax is a misunderstood bastard tax. The property tax is a collection of both the land and the improvements on the land. The majority of the property tax always falls on the building and other improvements. For those who rent, as property taxes go up, the portion which falls on the capital can be passed on to the renter. This tax also gives an incentive for buildings to deteriorate and it gives an incentive for speculators to hold land out of production and it also prevents a neighborhood from improving, imposing a cost on everyone.

Ever see a single wide trailer in a neighborhood where it clearly doesn't belong? Or a parking lot on a popular street corner and wonder why no one has ever built something there? Remember The US Supreme court Decision of Kelo in CT?

If only land and not the buildings are taxed, the land will always be used for its most efficient use. Further, if someone is not using the land efficiently and imposing costs on everyone else in society because of that they will pay for that privilege. Neighborhoods will always want to be kept up. People will want to build better improvements. Things will not always become "bigger" but they will become better and improved.

If we remove the tax from buildings and tax only land parking lots where they don't belong, like on a popular street corner, will go away. They will be replaced by buildings with shops and apartments. Parking will go underground or in garages.

If we were to shift to a LVT tax and a tax on other rents, Kelo would have never happened. There would have never been a case. Why? Because if the property is truly that valuable and those people wanted to stay, they would have been paying for that privilege in their land taxes.

Real property tax reform will be shifting the tax burden off of the capital and on to the land.

Originally posted to eire1130 on Tue Jun 13, 2006 at 06:22 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Doesn't matter really (0+ / 0-)

    Spitzer's message is winning upstate, because he isn't making it only about tax cuts.

    He is pointing to that which we in Albany know better than anyone, NYS government is the most wasteful spending bunch of crooks in the world. If Spitzer continues his 'smart spending' line, he owns the issue.

    I don't know what the Spizter line is downstate, but around Albany it is "Smart Spending" and that message is heard loud and clear here. Faso's line sounds a lot like Bush to most upstate people I have spoken too, "tax cuts" but no plan. If Faso has a broader message than that with his plan, it isn't getting out.

    Remember, the majority of upstaters tend to be fiscally conservative and socially liberal, political party means very little upstate, despite what the partisans say. It is why Democrats can hold local officers in red cities, and Republicans can hold local office in blue cities. All politics are local.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site