Skip to main content

Here's what a prominent Wisconsin politician recently said about the war in Iraq:

"Recent polls showing a waning of support for the war are a sign to the President that he needs to level with the American people.  When troops are dying, the commander-in-chief cannot be coy, vague, or secretive."

If you think that's a quote from Russ Feingold, you're wrong.  It was actually Mel Laird, a former Republican congressman and Secretary of Defense under Nixon.  It seems these days that everyone except George W. Bush thinks that the war isn't going well.

The invasion of Iraq was a mistake to begin with and I've called for immediate withdrawal of our troops.  I want to share some thoughts about how we got into this mess in the first place and how we can avoid such mistakes in the future.  

First, Bush exaggerated - and in some cases simply fabricated - the threat posed by Saddam.  He and civilian leaders - Don Rumsfeld in particular - selectively used intelligence to make a case for war.  

Second, Bush conflated Saddam and Osama - with disastrous results.  We took our eyes off the people who were behind 9/11.  Iraq war planning began in October of 2001 while our troops were conducting missions to hunt down Taliban and al Qaeda leaders.  We had an opportunity to catch bin Laden at Tora Bora but let him slip away while Bush and Rumsfeld planned for "shock and awe."  Funds for the Afghanistan operation were diverted and we let Osama slip away.  

Third, Congress failed in its oversight - asking few questions and serving as a rubber stamp for Bush's policies.  

Fourth, the administration's assumptions were wrong.  Vice President Cheney claimed that American troops would be greeted as liberators.  When we weren't, civilian leaders were too slow to react.  These early errors have created long term consequences because the Department of Defense refused to use the planning done by the State Department.  The failure is both due to Rumsfeld's disregard for facts and to Bush's self-imposed insulation from dissenting voices.  Now we're stuck figuring out how to encourage the formation of a functioning Iraqi government given deep and violent sectarian divides.

Fifth, military requests for additional troops were continuously rejected.  Colin Powell has said that he told General Franks, Rumsfeld, and Bush that more troops would be needed.  Paul Bremer told Rumsfeld that more troops were needed.  Gen. Eric Shinseki told Congress that more troops were needed.  Still, Rumsfeld and General Franks rejected requests for additional troops in an attempt to prove that we could get more done with fewer troops and more technology.  They were right about the initial invasion.  They were disastrously wrong about stabilizing the country in its aftermath.  As much as anything, the revolt of the retired generals is about this issue - and they're right to be outraged.  

Sixth, the military wasn't prepared to protect its soldiers and our troops have suffered as a result.  There simply wasn't enough adequate body armor.  In some cases, the armor distributed to soldiers was Vietnam-era flak jackets that were ineffective against weapons like AK-47s or Kalashnikovs.  A recent Marine Corps study concluded that up to 80% of casualties from upper body wounds could have been prevented with modern body armor.
That's a sad commentary on how well we've supported our troops.

Finally, Bush and Rumsfeld never took the training of Iraqi military and police seriously.  (See James Fallows' recent article in the Atlantic for a more detail -  Bush has repeatedly stated that "When the Iraqis stand up, we'll stand down."  Unfortunately, there's been little attempt to ensure that the Iraqis can stand up.

In sum, this war has been conducted with a breathtaking casualness and recklessness.

So where do we go from here?

I called for Don Rumsfeld to resign more than six months ago.  And I was glad to see seven retired generals reach the same conclusion in recent months.  

More fundamentally, it's time for us to withdraw our troops.  They have performed valiantly, but we've done everything we can in Iraq militarily.  The country is in a civil war, and we're caught in the middle while our military bleeds.  I fear we're in the worst of all situations at the moment - we don't have the troops to stabilize the country, and our presence there makes it easier for the Iraqis to avoid the only thing that can - a political deal that brings all parties to the table.  Only the Iraqis can settle this.  It's time for us to bring the troops home now.

Ultimately the buck stops with the commander-in-chief.  But we can push him in the right direction.  That's why I'm running for Congress.

Originally posted to Jamie Wall for Congress on Tue Jun 20, 2006 at 09:57 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thank you. (n/t) (0+ / 0-)

    "To tell the truth is revolutionary." Antonio Gramsci

    by va dare on Tue Jun 20, 2006 at 10:09:37 AM PDT

  •  I'll be here for a while (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Fox River

    I'll be glad to hear what you think.

  •  Thanks for stopping by (0+ / 0-)

    I like both you and Kagen in this race and it seems like this site is pretty divided between you two as well.  What do you make of his poll that showed him with 46% support and you at just 3%?

    •  You're welcome (0+ / 0-)

      I've been posting here for almost a year now.

      As for Kagen's poll, well, it's Kagen's poll.  We don't know what was asked, what the sample was, or how the candidates are described.  And they took it at then end of an his inital TV buy when he was the only candidate in the race on the air.  (That was only smart - they bought the poll results they wanted.)  In other words, take any internal poll - whether it comes from me or any other candidate - with a grain of salt.

      I have a tremendous volunteer organization, we're reaching out to thousands of voters a week, and I've raised more money than almost any other Democratic challenger in the Midwest.  We'll be up on TV before too long.  The voters will sort this one out in August and September...and then in November.

  •  Iraq (0+ / 0-)

    Thanks for posting a column today, Jamie! I look forward to reading your thoughts on other issues. I am a strong supporter. You definitely understand the issues better than any of the other candidates.

    Your campaign reminds me of Russ Feingold's first run for Senate, when he ended up unexpectedly winning his primary.

    You are definitely the liberal/progressive's choice. How do we get you a "Netroots" endorsement?

    peace and eddies, redboat

    by redboat on Tue Jun 20, 2006 at 12:16:31 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site