Skip to main content

How many wingnut "journalists" have laid exaggerated claims to Pulitzer Prizes, does anyone know?

Well, Thomas Lipscomb, that pillar of journalistic integrity, has recently been outed as having falsely claimed to be a Pulitzer "nominee" for his 2004 anti-Kerry screeds.

And Carlton Sherwood, the moonie apologist/anti-Kerry film producer, who claims to be a Pulitzer "recipient," is not far behind.  While not quite at Lipscomb's stunning level of falsity, he looks like a serious resume padder all the same.

Tom Lipscomb's mini-biography, which appears at the various websites that publish his articles, until very recently read as follows:

Thomas Lipscomb is an independent investigative reporter who was nominated for a Pulitzer for his reporting on Kerry during the 2004 elections. He is a senior fellow at the Annenberg Center for the Digital Future (USC) tom@digitalfuture.org

Cached Lipscomb article

Others were happy to jump on the Lipscomb-as -Pulitzer-nominee bandwagon:

U.S. News

The claim seems to have originated from Lipscomb himself, not some over-enthusiastic publisher:

Free Republic

Only you won't find Lipscomb's name on the list of any of the Pulitzer Prize nominees at the Pulitzer website:

www.pulitzer.org

Why?  Well, according to that website:

By February 1, the Administrator's office in the Columbia School of Journalism has received the journalism entries -in 2004, typically 1,423. Entries for journalism awards may be submitted by any individual from material appearing in a United States newspaper published daily, Sunday, or at least once a week during the calendar year. (History)

[. . .]

Work that has been submitted for Prize consideration but not chosen as either a nominated finalist or a winner is termed an entry or submission. No information on entrants is provided. (Terminology)

[. . .]

The three finalists in each category are the only entries in the competition that are recognized by the Pulitzer office as nominees.(History)

Eventually people began to take notice:

Democratic Daily

The Idiotarian Savant

Strange Monkey Doll

Freedom's Fire, Brightly Burning

Evidently enough queries were made of Lipscomb's primary online publisher, Real Clear Politics, that the mini-bio was changed last week, to read:

Thomas Lipscomb is an independent investigative reporter whose work was entered for the Pulitzer for investigative reporting in 2005. He is a senior fellow at the Annenberg Center for the Digital Future (USC) tom@digitalfuture.org

Real Clear Lipscomb bio

At least one other website that publishes his articles made a similar hasty change:

Military.com

But no public apology or explanation has been forthcoming. Not from Lipscomb, not from the sites that publish his pieces.

---------------------------------------------------

Now, for Carlton Sherwood, most recently (in)famous for producing the sleazy "Stolen Honor" flick:

Carlton Sherwood is a distinguished newspaper and TV investigative reporter and the recipient of journalism's highest honors in print and broadcast news, the Pulitzer Prize and George Foster Peabody Award.

Stolen Honor - About the Producer

Sherwood won a Pulitzer Prize for his investigative reporting of a Catholic scandal involving the Pauline Fathers of Doylestown, Pa.

WND

But you won't find Carlton Sherwood's name listed among the Pulitzer Prize winners, either.

The 1980 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service was awarded to Gannett News Service, not Carlton Sherwood.

That's because the Public Service gold medal is always awarded to a newspaper, never to an individual. (Or in this case individuals, as Sherwood was one of a group of reporters who worked on the series.)

www.pulitzer.org (Terminology)

Oh and BTW, the Public Service prize is not really given for "investigative reporting."  It is given for:

meritorious public service by a newspaper through the use of its journalistic resources, which may include editorials, cartoons, and photographs, as well as reporting.

Category Definition

While you're at it, look up the 1982 Peabody award winners...you won't see Sherwood's name there either, even though he claims to be a "recipient" of that one too. You guessed it, it was the TV station that broadcast a series that he - along with several others - happened to contribute to.

http://www.peabody.uga.edu/

Fraud?  Not outright.  Dishonesty? Misrepresentation?  Resume padding?  Ya think?

Originally posted to matchpoint on Sun Jul 02, 2006 at 01:55 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site