PsiFighter is at work, so I will try to update
his post as best as I can.
-- Yoss
Here it is,
The Complaint:
For clarification:
From the latest release:
Former CIA agent Valerie Plame Wilson and her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, filed suit in federal court today against Vice President Dick Cheney, his former Chief of Staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, top Presidential advisor Karl Rove and other unnamed senior White House officials, for their role in the public disclosure of Valerie Wilson's classified CIA status.
More below the fold...
The suit accuses the defendants of violating the Wilsons' constitutional and other legal rights as a result of "a conspiracy among current and former high-level officials in the White House" to "discredit, punish and seek revenge against" Mr. Wilson for publicly disputing statements made by President Bush in his 2003 State of the Union address justifying the war in Iraq.
The suit was filed nearly three years after Washington columnist Robert Novak disclosed Valerie Wilson's classified CIA employment in a column he wrote on July 14, 2003, based on leaks from senior administration officials. It subsequently was confirmed, during Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald's criminal investigation, that several top ranking officials in the White House leaked Wilson's name and status with the CIA to Novak and other reporters.
The Complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia by the international law firm of Proskauer Rose LLP, whose team is headed by Washington, D.C. litigation partner and privacy law practitioner Christopher Wolf. Noted Constitutional law scholar Erwin Chemerinsky, a professor of law at Duke University, is of counsel in the case.
As a result of Cheney, Libby and Rove's conduct, the suit claims that the Wilsons have suffered violations of their rights guaranteed under the United States Constitution and by laws of the District of Columbia.
The Complaint specifies that each of the Wilsons has been deprived of their First and Fifth Amendment rights; each has suffered a gross invasion of their privacy; each has been impaired in pursuing professional opportunities; and that they fear for their safety and the safety of their children as a result of the wrongful public disclosures. In addition, the Complaint alleges that Valerie Wilson was impaired in her ability to carry out her duties at the CIA, and to pursue her career at the agency in further service to her country, as she had planned. While no specific dollar amount is requested, the suit seeks compensatory damages, punitive damages and attorneys' fees and costs.
Read the rest here.
Don't mean to scoop PsiFighter's scoop, but we're on the same team anyway, and he is at work and can't necessarily update.
Update I
More from the latest release:
Excerpts From the Complaint in Wilson v. Libby, et al.:
"The lawsuit concerns the intentional and malicious exposure by senior officials of the federal government of one such human source at the CIA, Valerie Plame Wilson, whose job it was to gather intelligence to make the nation safer, and who risked her life for her country."
"The Defendants reached an agreement to discredit, punish, and seek revenge against the Plaintiffs . . . . Said agreement was motivated by an invidiously discriminatory animus towards those who had publicly criticized the administration's stated justifications for going to war with Iraq."
"The Defendants chose not to address publicly, directly, and on the merits why they may have thought Mr. Wilson was wrong or unfair in his statements on the President's misstatements. Rather, they embarked on an anonymous 'whispering campaign' designed to discredit and injure the Plaintiffs and to deter other critics from publicly speaking out."
"But for Mr. Wilson coming forward, it is unlikely that the Administration ever would have acknowledged its error. The fact that the administration had to admit its mistake is one likely reason why the Defendants chose to attack the Wilsons"
"The Defendants fraudulently concealed the existence of the Plaintiffs' cause of action . . . by, among other things, giving false or misleading testimony to federal law enforcement personnel and/or the federal grand jury empanelled to investigate the unlawful publication of Plaintiff Valerie Plame Wilson's classified CIA employment. . . ."
Update II
As mentioned below, this is an interesting part of the latest release:
Coinciding with the filing of the Complaint, the Joseph and Valerie Wilson Legal Support Trust has been established. Funds from the trust will help the Wilsons pay the substantial legal costs forced upon them by the unlawful leaking of Mrs. Wilson's covert CIA status. The objectives of the trust include:
* Counseling them in connection with their potential witness testimony during the upcoming trial of Scooter Libby; and
* Helping them to prepare the civil suit that will uncover the truth surrounding the leak, ensure all relevant public officials are held accountable for actions depriving the Wilsons of their privacy and constitutional rights, and serve as a deterrent to similar wrongdoing being committed in the future.
The Trust was established with the Wilsons' approval and provides that should the suit result in a payment to the Wilsons in excess of their legal costs, they will reimburse the Trust for all legal costs paid by the Trust. That money will then be distributed by the trustees to a charitable organization(s) that works to protect the rights of government whistleblowers.
Contributions to the Joseph and Valerie Wilson Legal Support Trust can be given at www.wilsonsupport.org or sent to P.O. Box 40918, Washington, D.C. 20016-0918.
This makes it very clear to the media, who I'm sure will fuck it up anyway: This is about holding our government accountable. This is not about personal gain.
Update IIIHere is where I will list the MSMs stories on the lawsuit as they hit the wire:
AP Story:
WASHINGTON (AP) — The CIA officer whose identity was leaked to reporters sued Vice President Dick Cheney, his former top aide and presidential adviser Karl Rove on Thursday, accusing them and other White House officials of conspiring to destroy her career.
In a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court, Valerie Plame and her husband, Joseph Wilson, a former U.S. ambassador, accused Cheney, Rove and I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby of revealing Plame's CIA identity in seeking revenge against Wilson for criticizing the Bush administration's motives in Iraq.
Bloomberg article:
July 13 (Bloomberg) -- Vice President Dick Cheney, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove and former Cheney assistant I. Lewis Libby were sued by a former covert CIA agent who claims the men conspired to illegally reveal her identity.
Valerie Plame, who worked at the agency's headquarters in Langley, Virginia, and her husband, former U.S. ambassador Joseph Wilson, filed the suit today in federal court in Washington. They are seeking unspecified financial damages.
The couple's suit accuses Cheney, Rove, Libby and other unidentified officials of violating their constitutional rights by conspiring to ``discredit, punish and seek revenge'' against Wilson for publicly disputing statements made by President George W. Bush in his 2003 State of the Union address in an effort to justify the war in Iraq.
Reuters has it:
The civil lawsuit cited "a conspiracy among current and former high-level officials in the White House" to "discredit, punish and seek revenge against" Wilson for publicly disputing statements made by Bush justifying the war in Iraq.
While no specific dollar amount is requested, the lawsuit sought unspecified compensatory and punitive damages and attorneys' fees and costs.
The suit also named Libby, who was Cheney's former chief of staff, and 10 unnamed senior government officials and aides.
CBS adds a tidbit, (a classic Bush administration tidbit):
CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen said that the complaint filed by Plame could open up a difficult court battle.
"The complaint doesn't read like a frivolous attempt to shakedown administration officials in order to get an apology or a large payday," Cohen said. "Wilson and Plame assert that the defendants violated their constitutional rights and caused them damage in a number of ways when they leaked Plame's name to reporters. It won't be an easy case at all to win for the plaintiffs but it's not a slam dunk for the defense either."
...snip...
The White House is avoiding a reaction to the Plame-Wilson lawsuit, reports CBS News correspondent Peter Maer. Spokesman Tony Snow said, "No comments on lawsuits, real or contemplated."
Update IV
The Responses:
From
Reuters:
Cheney spokeswoman Lea Anne McBride had no comment on the lawsuit. "This relates to a matter already before the courts, so our policy is not to comment on a matter in litigation," she said in an e-mail.
From
Bloomberg:
``Without even having had a chance to review the complaint, it is clear that the allegations are absolutely and utterly without merit,'' Rove spokesman Mark Corallo said in a statement.
Cheney spokeswoman Lea Anne McBride declined to comment.
Still awaiting a comment from the White House.
*******************************
Finally, check out SusanHu's
great diary while we are all waiting for an official Bush administration response!
More to come soon!
(From the editors of Deny My Freedom)