Skip to main content

University of Chicago Law Professor Richard Epstein has long been one of the leading lights of the conservative legal movement.  He is a fellow at both the Hoover and Cato Institutes, and author of the widely read book "How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution," which has been described thusly:

The Constitution was written and ratified to secure liberty through limited government. Central to its design were two principles: federalism and economic liberty. But at the beginning of the 20th century, Progressives (ancestors of modern liberals) began a frontal assault on those principles. Drawing on the new social sciences and a primitive understanding of economic relationships, their efforts reached fruition during the New Deal when the Constitution was essentially rewritten, without benefit of amendment. Now, in How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution, University of Chicago law professor Richard Epstein traces this history, demonstrating that our modern "constitutional law" was fashioned largely by the New Deal Court in the late 1930s, not in our country's founding principles. He also shows how so many of those "progressive" ideas -- however discredited by more recent economic thought -- still shape the Court's decisions.

Clearly, this is not some Warren-Court-worshipping liberal jurist.  This is a conservative, through and through.

Which is why Professor Epstein's harsh criticism of the Bush administration's authoritarian legal theories is all the more remarkable.  He wrote an Amicus Brief on behalf of Hamdan before the Supreme Court, arguing against the Bush administration's executive branch power grab, and he has excoriated the Adminstration's unlawful NSA wiretap program:

Richard Epstein, a University of Chicago law professor and a member of the group, said he believes the Supreme Court would reject Bush's assertions that his wartime powers authorized him to override the law.

''I find every bit of this legal argument disingenuous," Epstein said. ''The president's position is essentially that [Congress] is not doing the right thing, so I'm going to act on my own."

Today, in the Chicago Tribune, he explains the danger of Bush's aggressive use of signing statements, showing how Bush's practice could be used by an unscrupulous executive (such as the one in power now!), to topple our Constitution's unique system of checks and balances:

But put the point in reverse: If the presidential signing statements are no big deal, why does the president make them? One reason is that it skews the administration of a statute by presidential subordinates before a matter gets into court. A second--and more troubling--point relates to the larger question of the role of judicial review.

Modern understanding of judicial review requires the executive branch to take its marching orders from the Supreme Court. Signing statements, I fear, could be the opening wedge to a presidential posture that judicial decisions may limit the president's ability to use courts to enforce his policies, but cannot stop him from acting unilaterally. On this theory, the president could continue to order wiretaps and surveillance in opposition to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act after a court had determined that he has exceeded his powers--he just couldn't use the evidence acquired in court. Different branches of government have different views of the law, yet the executive marches on. A major check on executive power goes by the boards.

Read the whole thing.  Epstein may have uncovered Addington and Cheney's grand strategy to undermine the Court system, by creating a separate body of executive law over which the Court has no power.  This formulation is uniquely dangerous to our system of checks and balances, and could allow an unscrupulous executive to run roughshod over the other branches, and even defy the Supreme Court!

And remember, this is not some insane ranting lefty warning that Bush is Hitler.  Rather, this a person who has been one of the leading lights of the conservative movement for the past several decades, and one of the leading judicial scholars in the country.  The threat of unchecked executive power, and of a move towards a dictatorial-style regime is real.  It must be reported on and stopped before it is too late.

Originally posted to pontificator on Sun Jul 16, 2006 at 02:48 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Meteor Blades, Kimberley, Al Rodgers, The Centerfielder, nitpicker, Alumbrados, AustinSF, zzyzx, David Waldman, scott, pundit, TXdem, dwellscho, tgs1952, jillian, Laura Clawson, JoeWPgh, teacherken, Trendar, lipris, joejoejoe, moon in the house of moe, Doctor RJ, Geenius at Wrok, Dump Terry McAuliffe, jimpol, Unstable Isotope, whataboutbob, mem from somerville, saraswati, am, emal, Tom Ball, JTML, Sprinkles, Coldblue Steele, Shockwave, DCDemocrat, Ralfast, TX Unmuzzled, saluda, lostian1, Gary in NY, marjo, wild salmon, zgveritas, bumblebums, zeroooo, exNYinTX, jancw, zeitshabba, redtravelmaster, memberofthejury, kissfan, RubDMC, eyeswideopen, rickvonw, concernedamerican, PaintyKat, Justina, bronte17, leftwingnut, Joe Sixpack, conchita, skrymir, litho, macdust, mentaldebris, Doc Allen, nyceve, PsiFighter37, AlyoshaKaramazov, cosmic debris, scamp, boilerman10, vmibran, roses, ides, khloemi, chechecule, Frederick Clarkson, Dana in MN, peraspera, sgilman, LondonYank, MJB, bobsquatch, thingamabob, matt2525, bustacap, Cedwyn, Cardinal96, Braindead, Wild, Barbara Morrill, casperr, brainwave, gmb, billiammm, TXsharon, desmoinesdem, Jill Lehnert, niteskolar, flatford39, NYBri, joan reports, dwahzon, attydave, snakelass, Eddie Haskell, sommervr, lcrp, 313to212, 4jkb4ia, Democratic Hawk, walkshills, bwintx, AllisonInSeattle, parkslopper50, fugue, zett, DrReason, CanYouBeAngryAndStillDream, Mosquito Pilot, Steven D, DarkSyde, edavis, rebirtha, kd texan, Captain Doug, avahome, sawgrass727, Gowrie Gal, tami33, sxwarren, Skennet Boch, joanneleon, bloomer 101, Bluesee, radarlady, ManOnTheBench, bellevie, idle crank, Ckntfld, el dorado gal, docangel, coloradobl, LarisaW, baccaruda, seesdifferent, OpherGopher, irate, PBen, KnotIookin, panicbean, clammyc, station wagon, ChemBob, snacksandpop, Simpletonian, suskind, GUGA, majcmb1, jorndorff, Buffalo Girl, GreyHawk, calderonn, Burned, annefrank, ivorybill, evilpenguin, bmaples, Yamara, Arctor, mikolo, Savvy813, Cannabis, Zergle, neroden, wiscmass, FindingMyVoice, LivesInAShoe, Lisa Lockwood, sbdenmon, Cory Bantic, nymosyn, Brian B, Unduna, Spathiphyllum, JanL, proudprogressiveCA, hcc in VA, JanF, npbeachfun, Alan Arizona, danger durden, Land of Enchantment, hatdog, jay23, Eloi Scientist, bently, SoulCatcher, taracar, pmc1970, occams hatchet, Major Danby, Thundergod, Compound F, Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse, ama, rcbowman, vigilant meerkat, ABA, BlueInARedState, frogmarchbush, rl en france, Yellow Canary, martyc35, buhdydharma, Ohio 2nd, a gnostic, irishamerican, KDANTEATER, greenearth, SherriG, TalkieToaster, vome minnesota, thomaswilliam, Mom Calls Me Slick, novapsyche, FireCrow, beathan, Unitary Moonbat, BarbaraB, bonesy, justiceputnam, TeddySanFran, 14justice, va dare, BB10, means are the ends, kurt, Bernie68, Friend of the court, Intercaust, slksfca, Monique Radevu, Trixter, ccyd, jimijam, old wobbly, BeninSC, Cronesense, Cocker Mom, FWIW, ksp, Enufacas

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site