Skip to main content

Every year more than 80 percent of all low-income households experience at least one civil legal problem for which legal assistance is indicated. Of these households, nearly nine out of ten face the problem without legal help of any kind.
-
James A. Bamberger, Access to Justice (citing Legal Services Corporation, Documenting the Justice Gap in America (September 2005))

On June 27, 2006, Judge Kaplan ruled that federal prosecutors violated the constitution when they pressured the KPMG corporation (the employer of 16 defendants indicted for corporate fraud) to withhold payment of millions of dollars for their employees' legal fees. Regardless of your view of the properness of this decision,  what is most striking about it, is what it does not also say.

It does not say that everybody is entitled to millions of dollars to pay their lawyers for their defense against criminal charges. It does not say that people convicted of criminal charges have the right to have an attorney in order to appeal the decision. It certainly does not say that people facing housing evictions, withdrawal of healthcare, or

termination of welfare benefits have a right to have an attorney argue their side of the issue free of charge, let alone to hire the kind of lawyer who charges hundreds of dollars an hour like the defendants in the KPMG case.  

What this case highlights more than anything is the skewed nature of both our criminal and civil justice systems.

While the defendants at KPMG are constitutionally entitled to the payment of legal fees by their employer if their employer wishes to pay them (put differently, the government is not allowed to pressure their employers to abandon them in order to court leniency for the company), they face a maximum penalty of only 5-10 years in prison. Other criminal defendants who are facing far more serious charges (in some states the death penalty), are forced to rely on court appointed lawyers who make $60-75 an hour in New York (as of the enactment of a recent bill in 2003 before which the rate was $25 - 40) (also remember that the right to this attorney disappears if there's a need to appeal).  Indeed, there have been numerous cases in which these court appointed defense lawyers have slept through the trial, been drunk at trial, or have been high on drugs at the trial and the courts have found that their conduct did not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel (which would allow them to overturn the verdict) because it did not prejudice the proceedings.

Even if you're lucky enough to get a legal aid attorney, they still often have massive caseloads.

In one county in New York, a recent report found that each public defender attorney had 1000 misdemeanor and 175 felony cases a year.

So things are bad if you are not a rich white-collar criminal defendant these days.

But what about non-criminal cases like housing evictions, sexual harassment accusations, withdrawal of government benefits, unfair insurance claim denials, medical malpractice claims? Well - things are even worse. Indeed, you have no right to a lawyer at all --- not even one who only gets paid $60 - 75, or even the approximately $20 that legal Aid Attorneys make - not even one who is just willing to come sit and sleep through your entire trial or proceeding.

New York City is filled with stories of families evicted from homes after court proceedings in which their landlord took them to court.

The need to have counsel in these types of non-criminal legal proceedings is - breathtaking. As previously stated:

Every year more than 80 percent of all low-income households experience at least one civil legal problem for which legal assistance is indicated. Of these households, nearly nine out of ten face the problem without legal help of any kind. Statistical and anecdotal information confirms that a growing number of civil litigants are unrepresented by legal counsel on matters that implicate many of the most personal rights and interests -- personal and family safety, dissolution, child residential placement, child support, eviction defense, defense against housing foreclosures, protection against abusive consumer practices, and predatory lending schemes, just to name a few.

James A. Bamberger, Access to Justice:Confirming: Article : Confirming the Constitutional Right of Meaningful Access to the Courts in Non-Criminal Cases in Washington State, 4 Seattle J. Soc. Just. 383

As has been pointed out by previous commentators, what good is a right to a lawyer within one day of arrest, if you can be evicted permanently from your house without a right to any sort of legal representation whatsoever.

What can we do about this problem? We should all vocally support the Civil Gideon Project endorsed by the America bar Association's president Michael Greco. The project seeks to establish a constitutional right to have a lawyer when on the defensive side of civil proceedings involving such fundamental necessities such as housing.

In New York, we should all support a proposed bill to guarantee civil representation for seniors in housing court that will be up for consideration in the near future (more details to come in future posts).

Only when we all have the right to effectively defend ourselves in civil court with a lawyer, can we really be said to have fully realized rights as Americans - let alone to be the most developed and powerful nation in the world.

Until that happens, just hope that you're not one of the 80% of low -  income households who have to interact with the civil justice system -  and if you can scrape together the money to find a lawyer -  don't forget to keep pinching him so that he doesn't fall asleep - because you can likely forget about being able to sue him for malpractice.

For organizations and people promoting civil gideon click here.  

If you or your organization is interested in learning more about or working on these types of civil justice issues, please feel free to contact me at cdugger@drummajorinstitute.org.

Cyrus Dugger
Senior Fellow in Civil Justice
Drum Major Institute for Public Policy

Crossposted from DMI Blog

Originally posted to cyrus dugger on Wed Jul 19, 2006 at 07:31 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  'Only paid $60-75 an hour?' (0+ / 0-)

    Man, how can those attorneys feed themselves?

    •  This isn't about the attorneys (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Adam B

      60-75 bucks an hour is the going rate for bad lawyers.  That's the point.  This topic isn't about what lawyers make or the pity of being a lawyer, it's about how those without money get left behind in the justice system.

    •  Right - But wait... (0+ / 0-)

      The point is also that they just recently started getting paid this justa  few years ago. Think of the quality of legal services somebody getting paid the pre-2003 when it was 25-40.

      Law school costs an enormous amount of money. Whether or not lawyers should make as much as they do (or for that matter whether professinal atheletes should either), the point is that if you pay a lawyer much less than they could otherwise make on different cases, you're rendering sub-par services to the client.

      Lawyers getting paid little as compared to other cases will simply not focus on this case when balancing where to put their most effort.

      Let's not forget that a person's freedom and their home are often on the line here.

      Cyrus

      •  I know a couple of guys who take that (0+ / 0-)

        kind of work cause they believe in truth, justice, blah blah blah.

        As for me, $60 an hour buys a great big "bite me."

        I get calls to my office all the time from people who think I'm running some kind of social service agency.  

        "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" - Hunter S. Thompson (RIP)

        by redfish on Wed Jul 19, 2006 at 07:47:09 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  That's gross and the hours are usually capped. (0+ / 0-)

      Also he isn't getting paid 8 hours a day, there is a lot of time that can't be billed.

      Subtract from that cost of maintaining an office, paying a secretary, employment taxes and the guy is probably taking home $800 a week.

      "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" - Hunter S. Thompson (RIP)

      by redfish on Wed Jul 19, 2006 at 07:42:51 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  The problem is that there are only so many (0+ / 0-)

    good and/or qualified lawyers to go around.  

    For instance, how many housing attorneys are there in NYC?  Enough to provide competent counsel for every single person facing eviction?

  •  Winston & Strawn & Gov. George Ryan (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    awakenow

    Just today in the Chicago Tribune ther was an article about how the big time Chicago law firm Winston & Strawn tried to get the $20 million dollars worth of free legal defense representation that the frim gave Former Gov. George Ryan in his recent corruption trial classified as Pro Bono work.

    American Lawyer magazine refused to count it in their rankings of firms pro bono work since Ryan was neither particularly poor, nor were there any special civil rights issues involved in the case.

    Lying can never save us from another lie - Vaclav Havel

    by Muwarr90 on Wed Jul 19, 2006 at 08:05:38 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site