In time for the elections of some school board members tomorrow in Kansas
Joel Borofski, assistant of William Dembski, made some surprisingly revealing comments on
uncommondescent.
It really is ID in disguise. The entire purpose behind all of this is to shift it into schools...at least that is the hope/fear among some science teachers in the area. The problem is, if you are not going to be dogmatic in Darwinism that means you inevitably have to point out a fault or at least an alternative to Darwinism. So far, the only plausible theory is ID.
If one is to challenge Darwin, then one must use ID. To challenge Darwin is to challenge natural selection/spontaneous first cause...which is what the Kansas board is attempting to do. When you do that, you have to invoke the idea of ID.
PZ Myers
Pharyngula as usual has more on this.
Great, what did John West ask again?
"Which part of "do not include Intelligent Design" can't opponents of the standards understand?"
Well, we all certainly understand the real meaning. Is there any honesty left?