Skip to main content

Right Wing bloggers and Right Wing nuts have been using the term Islamofascist for quite some time, but last week the leader of the "free world," George W Bush, used the term for the first time. So, why would George W Bush sink to the level of extremist fear mongers? And, why would he do it at this time?

The very same Right Wing Extremists who had used this term, were the very same Right Wing Extremists who had dismissed Liberals for bringing up any parallel between the Bush administration's propaganda war and the Nazi propaganda war during the 1930s. The point is that political argument is filled with emotion, and there isn't anything in American cultural that is more emotional that World War II. This is because many people who fought in that war are still alive and many people still romanticize the patriotism of the "Greatest Generation."

Is it any wonder then that any emotionally charge argument tends to end with one side invoking the Nazi Specter  to win an argument. The fact is that the Nazis and Adolph Hitler have come to represent the pure embodiment of evil. This representation has become so big that one can not see the ideology that this movement actually represented. Bloggers on the right have actually proposed that the evil of the Nazis was what the liberals he hated must have been working toward. He believed that Hitler was the pure embodiment of liberal thought. Obviously this poor ignorant blogger did not have a clue about what the ideology of fascism actually was. If he knew that fascism was a form of extremist nationalism, this extremist nationalist "patriot" might have given pause, at least for a moment. But, reality is almost never logical and people tend not to recognize their own "evil" tendencies. After all, how could patriotism be bad?

I recently wrote about how patriotism can be bad in my piece on Michael Savage. People like Michael Savage, the Minutemen and other nationalist groups have created their personal vision for a future America. They see an American culture, an American language and a military guarding the border from anyone who might enter the country bringing different culture or language with them. This idea is eerily familiar to the Nazi dream. This parallel can easily be corrected by telling those who question it that American culture is superior to German Nazi culture, so there is no need to worry. Of course, every nation believes that they have an ideal culture, or they would correct their culture. No one says, we eat crappy food but we can't do anything about it because this is our culture. No, Americans say McDonalds serves the best food in the world, which's why there are so many McDonalds around the world.

So, if we look at the current situation with the Bush administration we can begin to understand why they might decide to play the Nazi card. First of all George W Bush is down in the polls, perhaps at the lowest opinion of any president in US history. The polls show that 44% of Americans strongly disapprove of the job that George W Bush is doing. Secondly, these people have tied this dissatisfaction with the president to the Republican lead congress who are up for election in November. Third, every strategy that Karl Rove has used in the past to manipulate the people has become less reliable. Whenever this had happened in the past Karl Rove has upped the degree of fear used to garner enough support to win the elections. They used the fear of homosexuals getting married, free abortions for everyone and even the image of the mushroom cloud to raise the fear level. And, since almost every way of raising the fear level has been used the Nazi Specter is the only that remains. So, by calling the terrorists Islamofascists he cleverly creates the idea that the War on Terror is equal to World War II, without actually saying those words.

If George W Bush or any credible person in the Bush administration were to say that the War on Terror were actually equal to World War II he would immediately be asked why the American people were not being asked to sacrifice like those members of the "Greatest Generation." Where is the draft? Where is the build up of munitions? Where are the enormous Manhattan style projects and the enormous efforts to undermine these Islamofascists? Where is the effort to raise the money to battle this evil blight? If George W Bush were to answer thee questions honestly he would need to either admit that the threat was not that serious, or he should actually do these things to actually fight this enormous threat.

So, but calling the terrorists Islamofascists George W Bush has been able to raise the level of fear without being required to do anything about it. This is the clever action of Karl Rove. Since Karl Rove's personal fear of prosecution has been reduced he is now able to raise the fear of the American people in order to get the Republicans re-elected to congress.

The interesting thing about this is that the entire objective of the terrorists is to raise the fear of the American people. Terrorists actually only kill a few people, but they kill them in very dramatic ways that get media coverage. The media coverage evokes fear in the American people, and this fear is the objective. Terrorists hope that the fear will make the American people change their minds and give Israel back to the Palestinians, or give the money from the Middle East oil back to the Arab people. And when the Americans show their fear they give the terrorists more hope that they will win. This hope translates into more recruits for the Islamofascist cause. When White officials and George W Bush repeat the deeds of the terrorists the terrorists actually get even more bang for their bombs. In this way the Bush administration has actually done quite a lot for the cause of the terrorists in promoting their deeds.

It is such a crazy world that we live in where those who claim to be doing the most for the nation are actually doing the most for the terrorists. But like the old saying goes, "It's all in the marketing."


Don't forget what Stephen Colbert said, "Reality has a well-known liberal bias."

Cross Posted @ Bring It On, tblog, Blogger and BlogSpirit

Originally posted to DrForbush on Mon Aug 14, 2006 at 09:44 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Interesting (0+ / 0-)

    I thought it was properly spelled "spectre", but a glance a says that both are correct spellings.

    Oh, and don't go pissing off Godwin any more that Cheney and Leiberman already have, is my advice.

    The urge to save humanity is almost always a false face for the urge to rule it. ~ H.L. Mencken

    by Jay Elias on Mon Aug 14, 2006 at 09:39:01 AM PDT

  •  Karl Rove, the New Lingofetishista (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Friend of the court

    Frame it.

  •  'Land of the Free, Home of the Brave.' n/t (0+ / 0-)

    Vote Jerry McNerney for Congress CA11

    by Friend of the court on Mon Aug 14, 2006 at 09:57:53 AM PDT

  •  The problem with the GOP and the old media... (0+ / 0-) that they live in the past. Rather than facing up to the realities of the current situation in Iraq, they keep trying to view the war through the lens of previous conflicts: WWII, Viet Nam, etc. Islamic militents are "fascists," Ned Lamont is McGovern, and on and on. Anything, it seems, to avoid dealing with the dog's breakfast of the here-and-now.

    I am the liberal media.

    by Stagarite on Mon Aug 14, 2006 at 10:12:19 AM PDT

  •  My first introduction to the term Islamofascism (0+ / 0-)

    was here on dKos. I was reading a comment supporting Israel's attacks against Lebanon and stressing the need to get rid of the people who threaten Israel's existence.

    So it ain't only rightwing bloggers and rightwing nuts who are fixated on this spin.

  •  Karl Rove must have studied Goebbels. (0+ / 0-)

    He knows it's all in the image and total control of the media.  But, it's just not working so well these days.  

    Catching terrorists BEFORE they do any damage doesn't allow them enough time to really scare us.  Nothing actually happened, so the public didn't actually get frightened.  No bounce for Bu$hCo.  

    What can they do next?  They must do something to get everyone's attention and make them feel like they're being saved by the "fatherland."  Yikes.  

    IMHO, we have modern-day Nazis in the White House, wearing American flag pins and we're all just going about our business.  When the f is this all going to end and how?  

    Just watched THE DOWNFALL, about Hitler's final days in his Berlin bunker.  Not a pretty sight with Nazis committing suicide left and right or killing each other for being "traitors" as the Russians closed in.  The Goebbels' characters (husband and wife) poisoned their seven children and then the husband shot the wife and killed himself.  Perfect ending for such purely evil people.  What will Rove do?

    •  I once imagined (0+ / 0-)

      that someday George W Bush would wake up and suddenly realize what he had done. Perhaps he would resign in disgrace, but I felt that it would be more likely that he would take the "easy way out." But, I have come to realize that George W Bush does not have the mentality to realize this at all. So, instead he is more likely to putter on until his days in office are over.

      •  I wish he would just 'putter on' - but we're (0+ / 0-)

        not that lucky.  His idea of puttering is tearing the world into shreds.  Bu$hCo is a dangerous idiot.  On one hand, he believes his blind followers and feels he's "doing God's work" and on the other hand he's listening to Rove and doing exactly as he's told.  I think he's vaguely aware that his life will be worthless around the globe once he leaves office, so I wonder if they'll ever give up the power at his command without a fight.

        I believe we're living in a stealth dictatorship that will show itself when it's certain it can't be overthrown.  But, my tinfoil hat is killing me on a daily basis at this point.  So take this with a grain of salt.

    •  We're just too free (0+ / 0-)

      and those alternative media keep sneaking in the facts!! What're we to do?

  •  If last week was in October (0+ / 0-)

    of 2005.

    "Islamic terrorist attacks serve a clear and focused ideology, a set of beliefs and goals that are evil, but not insane. Some call this evil Islamic radicalism; others, militant Jihadism; still others, Islamo-fascism. Whatever it's called, this ideology is very different from the religion of Islam. This form of radicalism exploits Islam to serve a violent, political vision: the establishment, by terrorism and subversion and insurgency, of a totalitarian empire that denies all political and religious freedom."[4] George W Bush, President of the United States speaking before the National Endowment for Democracy, October 6, 2005

    The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.

    by deathsinger on Mon Aug 14, 2006 at 11:05:24 AM PDT

  •  I demand you delete this immediately !!!!! (0+ / 0-)

    Slap it. Shoot it. Kaboot it.

    by adios on Mon Aug 14, 2006 at 11:37:41 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site