Skip to main content

So let's say that ABC ends up broadcasting slanderous or defamatory material against former public officials or misleading materials about the events leading up to the September 11th attacks.  (Ed. Note: This is a repost of a diary I wrote Saturday. I'm doing this because it was requested and because I think it's important.  More below the fold on this.)  What can you do then?

You can BOYCOTT Disney and all Disney subsidiaries.  You can write letters to the editor.  You can sell any Disney stock you own.  You can cease taping any ABC, ESPN, Disney Channel, Lifetime, E!, History Channel, Biography Channel, A&E, SOAPNet, JETIX, and Style tv shows with your DVR (yes, Disney owns, either wholly or partially, all of those TV channel brands).  You can do all these things and more.

One other thing you can do is protest the renewal of your local ABC affiliate's broadcasting license.  This diary is all about that process, what it entails, how to do it right (I hope), and whatever else you might need to know.

More below...

(Ed. Note:  This is a repost of a diary I wrote on Saturday.  I apologize for reposting it but I think it's something a lot of people might be interested in (especially Californians right now as you'll see below).  I've made a few minor corrections due to suggestions from commentators to that diary (thanks Airpower for the affiliate vs directly owned and operated note).  With that, here it is.)

First, you need to understand that the chances of succeeding in this are very small.  Even a massively organized effort is unlikely to succeed.  But it is something you can do and a large number of petitions against renewal is news in and of itself.  And it makes the execs sweat and the stockholders nervous because losing a station license is like getting Ebola: it's basically a death sentence.  Besides, to corrupt the New York Lotto slogan, "all you need is a petition and a dream!"  

So let's begin.  This is a list of the ABC stations that are directly owned and operated by ABC and when their licenses expire.  Note, some dates have come and gone.  This means the license is being considered for renewal as we... speak? communicate? I dunno.  More on that below.

 

CityStationLicense Expiration Date
Chicago, ILWLS12-01-2005
Flint, MIWJRT10-01-2005
Fresno, CAKFSN12-01-2006
Houston, TXKTRK08-01-2006
Los Angeles, CAKABC12-01-2006
WABCNew York City, NY06-01-2007
Philadelphia, PAWPVI08-01-2007
Raleigh-Durham, NCWTVD12-01-2012
San Francisco, CAKGO12-01-2006
Toledo, OHWTVG10-01-2005

 

Now many, many of you are not covered by that list.  You might wish to find out your local ABC affiliate's info.  Here's how to find out when your affiliate's license expires.

 

1.  Go to http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/tvq.html.

2.  In the box labelled "Call Sign" enter your local ABC affiliate's call sign.  If you live in the New York metro area, it'd be WABC.  If you live in New Hampshire (like I once did) you'd enter WMUR.  If you live in Portland, OR, it'd be KATU.  Etc.

3.  Scroll down the page to the selector box labelled "Output -- Select TV Query or TV List".  In the selector box, click on TV Query (detailed output + CDBS links).

4.  Click on "Submit Query" at the bottom of the page.

5.  When the results come back, scroll down just a little until you see a link for "Station Info".  Click that link.

6.  When that page loads, you will see a link "Click for Details".  Click it.

7.  On this page is a table of information.  One of those items is "Lic Expir:".  That contains the date that your station's license expires.  If you've been following through with WMUR you'd discover that it's 04-01-2007.  If you've been doing KATU, you'd now know that it's 02-01-2007.

 

For some of you, (e.g. those of you in Chicago, Flint, and Toledo), you'll be scratching your head because that date has come and gone.  What this means is that your station's license is currently in the renewal process and has not yet been renewed.  The station receives a temporary license while the FCC is considering whether or not to renew the license.  This process takes a little while.  For instance.  WTVD (above) last filed for renewal on July 30, 2004.  Their application for renewal was accepted on August 10, 2004.  Their renewal was granted on February 10, 2005.  WABC last filed for renewal on January 29, 1999.  Their renewal wasn't granted until July 15, 1999.  Additionally, the FCC is swamped with new applications related to the switch over to Digital TV.  So the renewal process takes a long time.

Anyway, congratulations.  You now know when your ABC affiliate's broadcasting license is set to expire.  So what now?  

 

From
The FCC's The Public and Broadcasting Booklet

Public Participation in Licensing Process.

Renewal Applications. You can file a formal protest against a station by filing a formal petition to deny its renewal application, or by sending us an informal objection to the application. You must file a petition to deny the application by the end of the first day of the last full calendar month of the expiring license term. (For example, if the license expires on December 31, you have to file your petition by the end of the day on December 1). Before you file a petition to deny an application, you should check our rules and policies, to make sure that the petition complies with our procedural requirements. Before their licenses expire, stations have to broadcast announcements giving the date the license will expire, the date on which a renewal application must be filed, and the date by which formal petitions against it must be filed. You can file an informal objection at any point until we either grant or deny the application.

 

Some of you (e.g. those of you in Raleigh-Durham, NC) have a long time to wait.  Others have missed the chance to file a formal petition to deny renewal (e.g. those of you in Chicago, Flint, and Toledo) but can still file an informal objection to renewal.  The many of the rest of you (and this includes me as a WABCer) have to bide your time and watch the calendar carefully.  The final lucky ones are in the process right now.  This includes all of you in California.

How do I know this?  They actually do renewals based on the state in which your station is located.  This page here has a chart on it telling you when your station's most recent application and expiration dates were or will be.  But the process outlined above for looking up your station info is important because it gives you access to info you will need to file a petition or objection.  (And I didn't discover that page until later in my research after I wrote the instructions above.  C'est la vie.)

 

But you probably are wondering: what's the difference between a formal petition and an informal objection?

A formal petition is a sort of official objection with legal implications etc.  An informal objection is something they pay attention to but does not have the formality and legal implications (e.g. the potential for a hearing, etc.) that a formal petition does.  Sorry I don't have a better answer.  They don't have one at all so this is the best I could come up with.

 

So how do I file an informal objection?  How do I file a formal petition?

Let's find out.  The FCC's official outline of the process is available here: http://www.fcc.gov/localism/renew_process_handout.pdf (also available here http://www.fcc.gov/localism/renew_process_handout.doc as a DOC file).  I'd strongly suggest reading it before filing anything, but I'll give you the general breakdown of what it says here.  Just don't blame me if my summary is incomplete, inaccurate, or in any other way wrong.  It is up to you to do this correctly.  I'm merely providing this information for educational purposes.

First, your station is required to file it's renewal application four months before its license is set to expire.  To find out if your station has filed its license renewal yet, follow the instructions above up through step 4.  Then follow these steps:

 

5.  When the results come back, scroll down just a little until you see a link for "Application List".  Click that link.

6.  You may get a page entitled "Application Search Warning".  If you do, just click the "Get Data" button on that page.  For those of you who don't, ignore this step.

7.  We should all be at the same point now.  You'll see a grey table on the page.  On the far left side is a column called "File Number".  You want to ignore the numbers part of this.  Instead, look in the letters section for the most recent file  that begins with the letters "BRCT".  This is the renewal application.

8.  Follow the row over to the right and check the date.  If it is very recent, then the application has been filed.  Feel free to click on either the "Info" or the "Application" links to view.  The "Info" link is dull but the "Application" can provide some interesting info.  They are required to include in their application all letters of complaint about "violent" programming, for instance, as an exhibit.

 

But getting back to business, once your station has filed it's renewal application, you can submit an informal objection at anytime until the renewal has been granted.  The format and info needed will be given below.

As to a formal petition, once your station has filed it's renewal, you have until one month before its license is set to expire to file a formal petition.  So if the license is set to expire on 12-01-2006 (e.g. Californian TV stations) then you have until 11-01-2006 to file a formal petition.  But you CANNOT file a formal petition until the application to renew has been sent in so make sure you don't send them too early either.  Check to make sure the application for renewal has been submitted first.

 

Ok. I'm gonna go with an informal petition.  What now?

You need to write a letter to the FCC.  But not just any letter.  Your letter should be in business format, written respectfully, and must meet certain requirements.

First, this letter must be a paper letter signed by you.  Emails don't count nor do faxes.

You should include a subject line that states that this is an informal objection to the renewal of the license of A, B, C whose facility ID number is D.  The license renewal application file number is E.

- A is the station's call sign, e.g. WABC, KGO, etc.
- B is the city in which the station is located (not where you live).
- C is the state in which the station is located.
- D is the facility ID number.
- E is the renewal application file number.

You might be wondering how to get all this crazy information.  Go back above to where we went through the steps of how to find out if your station has filed its renewal application.  Remember at the end I told you you could click on the "Info" link but it was kinda pointless?  I lied.  This link contains all of the information you need for your subject line.

You will need to allege a violation of the FCC laws or regulations and give sufficient information to establish that the violation did indeed occur.  Also, it will not be considered unless it is timely (i.e. received before a decision is made on the station's renewal application).

When sending this using regular mail, send it to:

 

Office of the Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street SW
Washington, D.C. 20554

          ATTN:  Video Division, License Renewal Processing Team
                      Room 2-A665

 

When sending by messenger, hand delivering, or anything else (e.g. UPS, Fed-Ex), use this address:

 

Office of the Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
c/o Natek, Inc.
236 Massachusetts Ave., N.E.
Suite 110
Washington, DC 20002

         ATTN:  Video Division, License Renewal Processing Team
                     Room 2-A665

 

Additionally, you should only file petitions to deny for your local ABC station.  You really don't have standing to complain about another station though it is unclear whether or not complaints about a different station than your local one would be ignored or returned.  You should also give reasons why you have an interest in this station's renewal application.  

Finally, you MUST include both the signed original and two copies.  Yep.  The classic "filled out in triplicate" does still exist. (Note: The unofficial regs seem to say that you do not need to do this, that only the original is fine.  I would recommend sending the original and two copies however just in case.  They couldn't deny you for sending too many copies, after all.  Especially not when it is their own website that instructs you to do so.)

 

I think I want to file a formal petition.  What now?

Contact a lawyer with media law experience.  Or contact some large organization that might be able to help you.  Seriously.  I don't mean to be dismissive here.  In fact I encourage you to pursue and look into doing this.  But this is a much more formal and legal type of complaint and the requirements are much more complex.  

As an alternative, consider trying to get your local or state DNC party involved or your local congress critter or senator.  The more clout the objector has, the more effective the application is likely to be.  And such people are much more likely to meet the standing requirements, etc., for a formal petition.

If you're not willing to invest the time and money in getting professional help to do this, then you really should consider urging a local progressive organization or public official to do this and file an informal objection personally.

 

So what FCC laws or regulations might this broadcast violate?

It's all speculation at this point because it hasn't aired yet.  (Ed. Note: it has now aired and it was both dreadfully boring and dreadfully misleading and possibly slanderous).  The most basic argument is something like this:

 

On September 10th and 11th 2006, (fill in the blank) broadcast a program entitled "The Path to 9/11" from 8PM to 10PM EDT.  (Fill in the blank) now is applying for renewal of its station license.  I am writing to object to that renewal.

The public interest would not be served by the renewal of (fill in the blank)'s license because their programming decisions have been contrary to the public interest in knowing and understanding the causes and failures that led to the September 11, 2001 attacks and being fully and truthfully educated about what really happened.  

Their broadcast of the program "The Path to 9/11" in which falsehoods and mistruths were presented in the format normally associated with a factual documentary and their advertisement of that program as being based on the 9/11 Commission's Report when in fact many parts of the program contradicted the findings in that report constitutes a grave breech of the public trust because of the strong likelihood that members of the public were led to believe as fact things that are simply untrue after watching that program.  The program additionally may have slandered certain former public officials by causing members of the public to believe that those officials made reprehensible decisions that they never made and failed to take needed actions in situations that never existed.

The decision to broadcast this program is a clear contravention of the public interest in truthful programming and in understanding what really happened to cause a public tragedy like 9/11 such that the provisions of 47 U.S.C. Section 307 have not been met and a license renewal should therefore not be granted to (fill in the blank).  (Fill in the blank) has attempted to confuse and mislead me and many other members of the public by broadcasting that program and should not be rewarded a station license renewal for its reprehensible actions.

 

That is just a potential argument that I personally might consider making when my ABC affiliate WABC's license comes up for renewal.  You may wish to make a similar argument but whether or not the argument is valid or will be accepted I do not know.  It could turn out that ABC gives in and does not broadcast that Riefenstahl-esque film.  (Ed. Note: they didn't and their editing work wasn't effective.)

(Ed. Note: The following is a new paragraph not in the original.)

The laws it may have violated are 47 U.S.C. Section 307 and 47 U.S.C. Section 308.  Read them and feel free to read other laws as well.  Go to http://uscode.house.gov/, click on search, and enter 47 for the "Title" and 5 for the "Chapter".  Then search.  Or enter III for the "Subchapter" if you want to see provisions that specifically deal with radio and television.  But understand that this is not an official version of the code.  Parts of it are not quite current due to changes in the law by Congress.  So do not rely on it for any legal purposes but feel free to use it for educational purposes.

 

Anything else?

Gosh I hope not.  But seriously, there are just a few more things I'd like to say.  This whole effort might seem pointless but that's what they said about Lamont's campaign when it got going.

There are a lot of ABC affiliates out there.  Ten in California alone.  And all ten of those are up for renewal right now.  If even one of them lost its license, it would be a death-knell for current ABC and Disney management.  They know it, they just don't believe it could actually happen.  But maybe one of those affiliates has had some other questionable incidents.  Maybe there are some skeletons in their closets and this could be what pushes it over the edge.

So without further ado, here are the section header lines for all of the ABC affiliates in California that you would want to include in any informal complaint you may choose to write.

 

Subject:  Informal Objection to the Renewal of the License of KAEF-TV, Arcata, CA whose Facility ID number is 8236.  The license renewal application file number is BRCT-20060809ADY.

----------------------

Subject:  Informal Objection to the Renewal of the License of KERO-TV, Bakersfield, CA whose Facility ID number is 40878.  The license renewal application file number is BRCT-20060802AAI.

----------------------

Subject:  Informal Objection to the Renewal of the License of KFSN-TV, Fresno, CA whose Facility ID number is 8620.  The license renewal application file number is BRCT-20060810ANJ.

----------------------

Subject:  Informal Objection to the Renewal of the License of KABC-TV, Los Angeles, CA whose Facility ID number is 282.  The license renewal application file number is BRCT-20060810ANG.

----------------------

Subject:  Informal Objection to the Renewal of the License of KESQ-TV, Palm Springs, CA whose Facility ID number is 25577.  The license renewal application file number is BRCT-20060718AEM.

----------------------

Subject:  Informal Objection to the Renewal of the License of KRCR-TV, Redding, CA whose Facility ID number is 8291.  The license renewal application file number is BRCT-20060809AEE.

----------------------

Subject:  Informal Objection to the Renewal of the License of KXTV, Sacramento, CA whose Facility ID number is 25048.  The license renewal application file number is BRCT-20060802AMH.

----------------------

Subject:  Informal Objection to the Renewal of the License of KGTV, San Diego, CA whose Facility ID number is 40876.  The license renewal application file number is BRCT-20060731AFX.

----------------------

Subject:  Informal Objection to the Renewal of the License of KGO-TV, San Francisco, CA whose Facility ID number is 34470.  The license renewal application file number is BRCT-20060810ANL.

----------------------

Subject:  Informal Objection to the Renewal of the License of KEYT-TV, Santa Barbara, CA whose Facility ID number is 60637.  The license renewal application file number is BRCT-20060802BBQ.

 

Well, that's about it.  There's still time for them to pull this sucker (Ed. Note: they didn't, those fuckers), but if they don't, make sure you watch it.

Wait, what???  What do you mean watch that piece of... propaganda?!?!?

I didn't have any intention of watching it either as you can see if you review previous diaries and comments of mine.  But if you don't watch it, you don't have very good grounds to complain about it to the FCC.

So at least watch a little of it.  Just enough to get sickened by it ought to do (I do mean more than the first 10 seconds though.  You really need to at least give the show a chance.  You can probably safely kill it once it starts defaming somebody or lying about the historical facts.  That's my plan anyway.  It shouldn't take that long.)

Then get busy drafting your objections.  And make sure you petition local civic groups, politicians, etc. to file formal petitions objecting to affiliate renewals.  It's a very risky thing politically, but it's also some big time publicity and a chance to start a positive dialogue with America about just how corrupt the rightwing has become.  Maybe the Big Dog'll jump in and formally protest WABC's renewal (it is his ABC affiliate now, after all) when the opportunity arises in just a month or so.

Finally, if you haven't written a letter to your local affiliate protesting it showing this program yet, do that now!  They are required to keep letters they receive from the public and if they have reasonable and dignified letters (not mad rants) objecting to them showing this program and they show it anyway, they cannot exactly claim after the fact that they had no idea that it was objectionable and against the public interest to defame honorable former public servants and distort the historical record for fun and profit. (Ed. Note: It's too late to do this now but I'm sure enough people did that the record is established)

Well, thanks for reading.  Good night and good luck.

(Ed. Note:  Thanks for reading again.  If you want the original version, FCC Licenses and You (The ABC / Path to 9-11 Edition) that link is where you'll find it.  There's a long back and forth on free speech, slander/defamation/libel law, etc. in the comments between me and someone else if you're interested with lots of cites and links to interesting case law.  So feel free to check it out.  But please post new comments here.  I hope you have found this helpful.  Once again, good night and good luck.).

Originally posted to Mike McL on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 06:44 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip jar off the port bow, captain. (n/t) (13+ / 0-)

    "Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." James Madison, Federalist No. 10.

    by Mike McL on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 06:33:07 PM PDT

  •  hell no (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    DennisMorrison, kingofthehill

    We should be pressuring ABC, Scholastic to pull the material.

    We should be pressuring their advertisers and clients to pull support for those organizations.

    We should be encouraging those that were slandered by the broadcast to civil seek restitution.

    We should not be encouraging government censorship of ABC, even though we do not agree with their material.  

    This is America, a nation under siege from the radical right and a nation whose liberty is in peril.  This is not the time to be trying to curtail free speech, even when that speech is the same right-wing propaganda that is causing the problem in the first place.

    If we have to throw out the constitution to win this fight we have already lost.

    •  It's not a curtailment of free speech (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      ScienceMom

      Please go read the entire debate I had with Dgrishka1 over this issue.  Then if you still think it's a speech issue I'd be happy to begin that debate anew here.

      "Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." James Madison, Federalist No. 10.

      by Mike McL on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 06:54:43 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  They did not keep up their end of the bargain (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Mike McL

      They will still be able to speak through their vast cable and motion picture distribution empire, but they have received electromagnetic spectrum that belongs to the public and have misused it against the public interest.  It's not censorship, it's a de facto breach of contract.

      And the affiliates could have refused to air it because of community standards.

      What we could do for the libertarians is cease to limit the broadcast spectrum, so that anyone can transmit on any frequency.  That might have the same effect, given how much radio spectrum is owned by rightwing commentators like Rush.

  •  This IS EXCELLENT!!! (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ScienceMom, Mike McL

    Even a hearing about the license makes them lose clout. And since ABC did this because BUSH promised:

    1. end to indency fines
    1. no limits on media ownership
    1. 95 yr copyright on all broadcast

    (as described here)
    http://www.dailykos.com/...
    a little response is needed!

    IF the Dems take the Senate we need to repeal the Bono Copyright extension act, or maybe just   threaten Disney's sweet hold on Mickey forever. There could even be a special bill that says that the extension does NOT apply to any company begun as a sole proprietorship with a rodent as a trademark .....

    the Dems have got to learn to STAND UP AND REFUSE TO ACCEPT THIS CORPORATE CORRUPTION OF DEMOCRACY!

  •  Great diary, thanks... (more) (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Elwood Dowd, Mike McL
    I also suggest writing a letter to the local station "In care of Public File" in which you spell out you objection to the 911 program in detail, but in the first paragraph specify that your letter be placed into the public file for the station.  This puts your complaint into a file that is used at license renewal time and generally when someone writes a letter to a station's public file its taken more seriously.  

    I suggest this on the local level in addition to the steps outlined in this diary.  

    I'd personally like to see more local licenses under pressure for many reasons, not just this PT 911 incident.  Our media are using our airwaves to run psyops against us and we have to stop them.

  •  Thank you, brother! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Mike McL

    This diary is a great service to the community.  And to our country.

    Bravo.

  •  A possible conversation (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Mike McL

    between station manager and his broadcast-law lawyer:

    Station manager:  Hey, we got an informal complaint against us filed with the FCC about "The Path to 9/11".  What do we need to do?

    Lawyer:  Let's see... they say you knowingly broadcast a false and misleading pseudo-documentary...

    SM: How could we know in advance it would be false and misleading?

    Lawyer:  Well, right here are some letters you got the week before, cautioning you...

    SM:  Oy!  We get letters all the time -- usually silly.

    L:  Well, this one predicted pretty much what the subsequent complaint says.  And this review by the local paper shows their TV critic accepted as fact what was actually fictitious dramatazation.
       Hmm... they also say it was politically slanted.

    SM:  So what?  The equal time doctrine went out back in the Reagan era.

    L:  Yes, but they make a good point that misleading the electorate is against the public interest, which ties into your station being granted its broadcast license to serve the public interest.  You don't have to count minutes, but this show was five hours.  Was it all slanted?

    SM:  And the guys at ABC national headquarters assured us they'd re-edit things so the show would pass muster!

    L:  If you've got that in writing, you'll have an excellent case against national ABC if you lose your license.

    SM:  Lose our license!!!  That's like a death sentence for the station!!!  We can't lose our license.  It's OURS!

    L:  It's very unlikely, but you'd better start taking it seriously.  

    SM:  What's that mean?  How seriously?

    L:  Put it like this:  Your station can expect to pay for college for my three kids.  Let your investors know their dividend checks may get smaller.  I'll start rearranging my schedule.

    We're all pretty crazy some way or other; some of us just hide it better. "Normal" is just a setting on the dryer.

    by david78209 on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 07:08:43 PM PDT

  •  Thanks, this is high-quality info (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Mike McL

    We should do this kind of thing more often. Use the tricks that the right-wingers use.

    Like the AFA calling CBS affiliates and threatening to file a decency complaint against them because of the French documentary "9/11." We know they weren't calling about the language in the French documentary -- they were trying to knock it off the air so more people would watch "Path to 9/11."

    We should use the FCC to do some of our dirty work.

    Iraq was not about 9/11. And bin Laden is still free.

    by Naturegal on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 07:16:25 PM PDT

    •  There's definitely a need... (0+ / 0-)

      for progressive AFA-type organizations.

      And we definitely should make the FCC do some of our dirty work. But in this case the only thing dirty about it is the program we're complaining about! :)

      "Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." James Madison, Federalist No. 10.

      by Mike McL on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 07:20:09 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  You Get Beaucoups Of Good Mojo For This! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Mike McL

    Thank you for helping me decipher the FCC's technical website.  I was wondering where I could find license information and you've shown me where and how!  More than that, you've helped me connect the dots on what I must now do to follow up on the letters to station managers I emailed last week.  Found out that the license to our ABC affiliate expires in friggin' 2013, but I'm gonna follow up and file a protest nonetheless.

    Bravo, Kudos and many, many thanks for this repost!  Highly recommend!

  •  Alb, NM - KOAT expiring Oct '06 WOOHOO (0+ / 0-)

    Let's get on it, NM.

    Additional motivation: I wrote to KOAT last week politely asking if they were going to air the film, and if they had any concerns with it; you know, the perfect polite letter that usually has them jumping to respond & promote their point; but no, they sent me a copied form letter from parent company ABC.

    NM is not very heavily populated; you'd think they'd care what their viewers thought.

    More motivation: they slant towards the GOP, too.

    >:)~

    "'Tis the time's plague when madmen lead the blind" -Shakespeare

    by gitana on Tue Sep 12, 2006 at 12:55:18 AM PDT

    •  Get your objections in now! (0+ / 0-)

      It's unfortunately likely too late for a formal petition against KOAT (unless they filed their application late, which is unlikely but you never know).

      HOWEVER, it's the perfect time to begin sending those informal protests.  Talk to your local dem party and see if they have any recommendations or would be willing to organize a drive to encourage others to file informal protests.  Also, are there progressive organizations either locally or in NM as a whole that might be willing to help?  Give them a call.  Whatever you can do is great.

      Remember that you must allege specific violations of the FCC act in your letter.  So talk about specific scenes in PT911 that you feel defamed individuals and talk about how you sent the station a letter informing them in advance that their program had problems with it.

      You might then wish to mention N.M. Stat. Ann. Section 41-7-6, New Mexico's "Defamation by radio and television; liability of owner, licensee or operator; compliance with federal law." law.

      It's really up to you what you write and how you write it.  I cannot give you much more than what I've said above because I really do not want to be slammed with any sort of practicing law without a license charges.  But that should be some educational food for thought that may help you if and when you decide to write an informal protest letter.

      If you do write one, an appropriate subject line might be:

      Subject:  Informal Objection to the Renewal of the License of KOAT-TV, Albuquerque, NM whose Facility ID number is 53928.  The license renewal application file number is BRCT-20060601BMJ.

      In case you were interested in viewing their renewal application, it's available at this FCC link.  If you're looking to stir up local ire against KOAT, you might start questioning why they use a North Carolina law firm when there are plenty of good New Mexico law firms available.  Just some food for thought.  Good luck.

      "Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." James Madison, Federalist No. 10.

      by Mike McL on Tue Sep 12, 2006 at 07:16:29 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  ? (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Mike McL

        I thought the deadline for the formal petition was on the first day of the expiration month - ie, KOAT expires Oct, the deadline would be Oct 1st...?

        Did I misunderstand the thread?

        "'Tis the time's plague when madmen lead the blind" -Shakespeare

        by gitana on Tue Sep 12, 2006 at 11:15:19 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  PS (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Mike McL

          Great research, especially the law firm! TY!

          "'Tis the time's plague when madmen lead the blind" -Shakespeare

          by gitana on Tue Sep 12, 2006 at 11:16:17 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

        •  First day of the last full calendar month... (0+ / 0-)

          before expiration.  But don't blame yourself for misunderstanding.  The FCC is more to blame on that one.  They use an example in the "The Public and Broadcasting" booklet in which a license expires on Dec. 31 thus your last chance is Dec 1.

          But they in fact set all licenses to expire on the first day of the month.  So they should've given an example like "if the license expires on Dec 1., your last chance is Nov. 1."

          If you scroll back up to the section of that booklet that I quoted in the diary you'll see what I mean.  But it's not too late for an informal objection and you might wish to call the FCC and make sure it's not too late for a formal petition.  There are situations in which they extend the deadline for formal petitions against renewal (e.g. the station was late in filing its renewal application) so you never know.

          "Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." James Madison, Federalist No. 10.

          by Mike McL on Wed Sep 13, 2006 at 07:51:53 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  How do I know what is the call sign for (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Mike McL

    ABC's affiliate in Washington DC?

    Power ought to serve as a check to power - Montesquieu, 1748

    by mimi on Tue Sep 12, 2006 at 06:45:24 PM PDT

    •  The DC affiliate is... (0+ / 0-)

      WJLA.  Oddly enough, though their license expired on 10/1/2004, it is seemingly still in the renewal process.  Anyway, a proper header for an informal objection against them would look something like this:

      Subject:  Informal Objection to the Renewal of the License of WJLA-TV, Washington, D.C. whose Facility ID number is 1051.  The license renewal application file number is BRCT-20040526ADY.

      If you're interested in seeing the application itself, you can access it here.

      "Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." James Madison, Federalist No. 10.

      by Mike McL on Tue Sep 12, 2006 at 09:08:49 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  You might wish to consider talking about... (0+ / 0-)

      Joe Allbritton whose company owns the station in your complaint.  With all the stuff surrounding Riggs Bank and its dealings with dictators, etc. it may show problems with good character of the licensee (or more specifically its owner).

      "Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." James Madison, Federalist No. 10.

      by Mike McL on Tue Sep 12, 2006 at 09:19:47 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Oh, interesting... (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Mike McL

        He noted that the bank's overhead is high and that Riggs under Allbritton had emphasized international and embassy business "which were break-even or less" and high-risk.

        I guess there are reasons for that ...

        How interesting. Thank you so much for your effort to teach us how to effectively fight back.

        Power ought to serve as a check to power - Montesquieu, 1748

        by mimi on Wed Sep 13, 2006 at 03:55:37 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site