Daily Kos

Union Endorses the Non-Union Candidate

Thu Jan 12, 2006 at 07:00:57 PM PDT

So the AFL-CIO endorsed Duckworth. And this is surprising how? The biggest Democratic machine backing union backed the Chicago machine candidate. I'm shocked. I'm surprised. I'm stunned. I'm not.

What does surprise me is that the AFL-CIO is endorsing the only candidate who hasn't been a member of a union, let alone been an active proponent of labor politically, but instead backed a candidate who has no clearly defined or articulated positions on labor. I bet that might surprise the rank and file a bit.

Cegelis has been a union member and comes from a union family. In 2004 she received widespread union support, including an endorsement from the AFL-CIO. Cegelis hasn't changed her views to position herself politically; she hasn't shrunk from her outspoken support for labor and union issues to curry favor. She's on the record consistently opposing CAFTA, advocating for raising the minimum wage, and opposing changes in overtime pay eligibility. Cegelis' views on labor are not only known, but demonstrated through actions and not just well crafted words written by a publicist. But more importantly, her actions have no strings attached to them.

Foundationally, Cegelis' campaign is about helping ordinary everyday Americans reclaim the American Dream. Key to the American Dream is the American middle class success. And key to the middle class has been organized labor. The two are not separate and she knows it:

America's economic stability rests on the strength of our middle class and the strength of our middle class rests on how we can make the American Dream a reality for everyone.

[...]

As globalization causes increasing numbers of American jobs to be outsourced, the Bush Administration pushed CAFTA through Congress. CAFTA and other free trade agreements bring increasing job losses at a time when we can least afford it. Our Republican leadership has expanded the H-1B visa program to foreign workers -- bringing workers in from outside our country to train and perform jobs once held by Americans. That means foreign workers are being trained in America for jobs that will then be shifted overseas. As a consultant at area corporations, I have seen first-hand the jobs lost to the H-1B program and the outsourcing that is a direct result. These are good-paying jobs that are not replaced here. In Congress, I will oppose CAFTA and other similar free-trade agreements and I will vote to reduce the number of H-1B visas draining jobs from our industries.

My grandfather was a union steel worker, and I am proud of the strong work ethic and fight for workers' rights he exemplified. If I am elected to Congress, I plan to fight hard to protect the rights unions have won for all workers including collective bargaining, overtime pay, and sick leave. I will fight to continue to work towards equal pay enforcement, and to make the minimum wage a livable minimum wage. It will take resolve to reclaim our American Dream, and it's a battle I'm prepared to take on.


Since Cegelis was a union member and comes from a union family she understands first hand the issues important to union members and working families in the district. She's not just talking the talk. She's walking the walk. And she's walked that walk in many a local union hall in the district. Just like she'll be doing this weekend.

This Saturday, Cegelis will host a conversation on labor and employment issues - at a union hall where she's spoken to gatherings of union members before:

Christine will team up with Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) in an event highlighting labor and job creation issues. Please plan to join us and add your voice to a spirited discussion of these critical issues facing District 6. In 2005, DuPage County posted its first job loss numbers in more than 50 years, according to the Daily Herald. As many area companies announce layoffs and outsourcing is on the rise, solutions and fresh ideas are needed.

So together with the senior most woman in Congress known for her support of labor, Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), Cegelis will discuss labor issues with district residents and union members at the International Association of Machinists Hall. That's a demonstration of genuine command of the issue and honest interaction with district residents, not just an orchestrated media endorsement event.

The machine wants you to believe Cegelis can't win. Prove them wrong here.

Tags: IL-06, Christine Cegelis, Tammy Duckworth, Lindy Scott, AFL-CIO, unions, labor (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 15 comments

  •  a little more (none / 0)

    link:  "The union voted unanimously Tuesday to back Duckworth--who joined the Democratic race last month with the backing of U.S. Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. She received the nod over Rolling Meadows software engineer Christine Cegelis, who ran against Hyde in 2004, and Wheaton College professor Lindy Scott.

    "In endorsing Duckworth, who lives in Hoffman Estates, union delegates spoke about her positions on trade, education and the economy, said Illinois AFL-CIO President Margaret Blackshere.

    ""It was totally focused at Tammy," Blackshere said of the endorsement. "It wasn't as if it was opposed to Christine. It was supportive of Tammy.""

    •  OK (none / 0)

      So what are her positions on labor?
      •  I don't know. (none / 0)

        Clearly, she must've told them something.

        Next week's FEC filings will be quite interesting.

        •  Too bad she didn't tell anyone else... (none / 0)

          Like maybe the residents of the district.
          •  Progressive or Democrat? (none / 1)

            All of the Cegelis supporters I know, myself included, don't really have anything bad to say about Duckworth. Except that if she is aware of the grassroots support that Cegelis has, and she is now seeing first hand how mainstream machine power politics is played, how she would want to be a part of that. But then again, she's lost her legs and who can blame her for not passing up a bird in the hand from Rahm? (By that I mean her Campaign in a box all laid out, paid for and handed to her from Rahm.) Hard to judge others until you've been in the same situation yourself. I would like to think I couldn't be bought.

            And maybe she isn't being bought. If she is just a politics as usual, mainstream machine power grabber, well then that's who she is and what she stands for. But then don't try to use the L(iberal) or P(rogressive) label in your campaign.

            It's kind of ironic how to certain kinds of republicans ALL democrats are liberal or "lefty" - my congressman "Wrong Way" Weller being one. But to certain kinds of democrats the same thing applies! There is a difference between a progressive democratic candidate and a democratic candidate. Cegelis is the former and Duckworth the latter. That's why Rahm won't back Cegelis even though he knows she can win if she had the support of the democratic party.

            And to people who say things like "whoever wins the primary, though, good democrats will get out and support the winner because we are grown ups." Or something to that effect, they are one of those Rahm democrats really.

            If Duckworth should happen to win the primary, and it were my district, I would let the Rahm Democrats know how I felt by not voting in that particular race. Maybe that means Roskham will win. But as a progressive, we are talking about one Congressional Race. (For instance here in the 11th CD there will be no primary, we have a choice between Weller or the Democratic candidate also recruited by Rahm, John Pavich. I can vote for Pavich easily - there are no alternatives and Pavich could very well turn out to be very progressive in his politics as a democrat. Right now I think, in a district that still leans very republican, he has to be cautious as he campaigns.)

            But had he come in and carpet bagged like Duckworth, he wouldn't be getting my vote, not even against a Darth Vadar type like Weller. Grass roots will keep getting mowed over by power mongers until we flex our own muscle and stand up for what we believe, even if it hurts - for the short term.

            Just another souless atheist working for World Peace and Harmony

            by Kankakee Voice on Thu Jan 12, 2006 at 09:19:42 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

    •  Too bad (none / 0)

      Duckworth has no history of engaging with organized labour.  
  •  Speaking about unions endorsing (none / 0)

    a non-union candidate, I'm still shocked that the New York City local of the International Association of Fire Fighters endorsed Bush over Kerry in 2004. Bush, the same jackass who made it a point to proudly proclaim that if he had his way every state would be a right to work state, and unbelievably this union local endorsed him.

    Regarding the IL AFL CIO endorsement of Duckworth, I would have hoped that they would have at least waited until after the primary to make an endorsement especially considering that Cegelis has a personal and family history of union membership and I can't see Duckworth's positions being more pro-labor than Cegelis. Seems like the political machine is working hard for Duckworth.

  •  Good for the union. We want to win. period (none / 0)

  •  stumbling towards irrelavency (none / 0)

    AFL-CIO is yesterday's politics.  That's why they're losing members; that's why they're splintering.

    "What a waste it is to lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is being very wasteful. How true that is." --Dan Quayle

    by jakester on Thu Jan 12, 2006 at 07:36:53 PM PDT

  •  Rahm must be very proud of himself (none / 0)

    From the Marx Bros "Duck Soup" - Chico "What's big, gray and has a long trunk?" Prosecutor "That's irrelevant." Chico "That's a right! An elephant!"

    by vegancannibal on Thu Jan 12, 2006 at 07:43:39 PM PDT

Permalink | 15 comments