Daily Kos

The Ministry of Truth: selective memory on the Right

Sun Jan 22, 2006 at 01:36:50 PM PDT

Many of us have noticed a few things. Things that have stopped being covered in the media, things that exist for a time but then the articles mysteriously disappear. Transcripts, not only of White House events but even of talk shows on TV are altered before posted on official websites. The focus of public outrage is easily shifted from one topic to another, and those of us with an attention span are left wondering how everyone else doesn't notice that something is wrong. We were at war in Afghanistan. We still are, people are still deployed over there, but now we are at war with Iraq. Except that things must be going fine in Iraq, because now the big story is Iran.
Every time the administration has trouble, something tends to happen. How soon was it after the Plame story broke that the terror attacks happened in London? Remember when a white girl went missing in Aruba and it focused the attention of the media entirely? Can you even clearly remember what had been going on at the time? Then the wiretap issue came up, and all of the sudden we have Goldstein's, I mean, Osama's voice taunting us and reccomending liberal books. While all those attention focusing news events most likely didn't occur because they were orchestrated, there has been a concentrated effort to focus attention on them and away from the stories that matter. Even if these crisis events that FOX and CNN and the others like so much weren't manufactured, the attention on them certainly was. What does this remind you of? For me, it brings to mind the Ministry of Truth from 1984, especially the increasingly prevalent practice of alteration and censorship.

On the sixth day of Hate Week, after the processions, the speeches, the shouting, the singing, the banners, the posters, the films, the waxworks, the rolling of drums and squealing of trumpets, the tramp of marching feet, the grinding of the caterpillars of tanks, the roar of massed planes, the booming of guns -- after six days of this, when the great orgasm was quivering to its climax and the general hatred of Eurasia had boiled up into such delirium that if the crowd could have got their hands on the 2,000 Eurasian war-criminals who were to be publicly hanged on the last day of the proceedings, they would unquestionably have torn them to pieces -- at just this moment it had been announced that Oceania was not after all at war with Eurasia. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Eurasia was an ally.

Whoops.

There was, of course, no admission that any change had taken place. Merely it became known, with extreme suddenness and everywhere at once, that Eastasia and not Eurasia was the enemy. Winston was taking part in a demonstration in one of the central London squares at the moment when it happened. It was night, and the white faces and the scarlet banners were luridly floodlit. The square was packed with several thousand people, including a block of about a thousand schoolchildren in the uniform of the Spies. On a scarlet-draped platform an orator of the Inner Party, a small lean man with disproportionately long arms and a large bald skull over which a few lank locks straggled, was haranguing the crowd. A little Rumpelstiltskin figure, contorted with hatred, he gripped the neck of the microphone with one hand while the other, enormous at the end of a bony arm, clawed the air menacingly above his head. His voice, made metallic by the amplifiers, boomed forth an endless catalogue of atrocities, massacres, deportations, lootings, rapings, torture of prisoners, bombing of civilians, lying propaganda, unjust aggressions, broken treaties. It was almost impossible to listen to him without being first convinced and then maddened. At every few moments the fury of the crowd boiled over and the voice of the speaker was drowned by a wild beast-like roaring that rose uncontrollably from thousands of throats. The most savage yells of all came from the schoolchildren. The speech had been proceeding for perhaps twenty minutes when a messenger hurried on to the platform and a scrap of paper was slipped into the speaker's hand. He unrolled and read it without pausing in his speech. Nothing altered in his voice or manner, or in the content of what he was saying, but suddenly the names were different. Without words said, a wave of understanding rippled through the crowd. Oceania was at war with Eastasia! The next moment there was a tremendous commotion. The banners and posters with which the square was decorated were all wrong! Quite half of them had the wrong faces on them. It was sabotage! The agents of Goldstein had been at work! There was a riotous interlude while posters were ripped from the walls, banners torn to shreds and trampled underfoot. The Spies performed prodigies of activity in clambering over the rooftops and cutting the streamers that fluttered from the chimneys. But within two or three minutes it was all over. The orator, still gripping the neck of the microphone, his shoulders hunched forward, his free hand clawing at the air, had gone straight on with his speech. One minute more, and the feral roars of rage were again bursting from the crowd. The Hate continued exactly as before, except that the target had been changed.

How familiar does that sound?

Oceania was at war with Eastasia: Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia. A large part of the political literature of five years was now completely obsolete. Reports and records of all kinds, newspapers, books, pamphlets, films, sound-tracks, photographs -- all had to be rectified at lightning speed. Although no directive was ever issued, it was known that the chiefs of the Department intended that within one week no reference to the war with Eurasia, or the alliance with Eastasia, should remain in existence anywhere. The work was overwhelming, all the more so because the processes that it involved could not be called by their true names. Everyone in the Records Department worked eighteen hours in the twenty-four, with two three-hour snatches of sleep. Mattresses were brought up from the cellars and pitched all over the corridors: meals consisted of sandwiches and Victory Coffee wheeled round on trolleys by attendants from the canteen. Each time that Winston broke off for one of his spells of sleep he tried to leave his desk clear of work, and each time that he crawled back sticky-eyed and aching, it was to find that another shower of paper cylinders had covered the desk like a snowdrift, half burying the speakwrite and overflowing on to the floor, so that the first job was always to stack them into a neat enough pile to give him room to work. What was worst of all was that the work was by no means purely mechanical. Often it was enough merely to substitute one name for another, but any detailed report of events demanded care and imagination. Even the geographical knowledge that one needed in transferring the war from one part of the world to another was considerable.

It's a growing career field, now might be a good time to get in on the ground floor of history alteration.

The next excerpt is from later in the book, when Winston is being interrogated and broken down by O'Brien.

'I am taking trouble with you, Winston,' he said, 'because you are worth trouble. You know perfectly well what is the matter with you. You have known it for years, though you have fought against the knowledge. You are mentally deranged. You suffer from a defective memory. You are unable to remember real events and you persuade yourself that you remember other events which never happened. Fortunately it is curable. You have never cured yourself of it, because you did not choose to. There was a small effort of the will that you were not ready to make. Even now, I am well aware, you are clinging to your disease under the impression that it is a virtue. Now we will take an example. At this moment, which power is Oceania at war with?'

'When I was arrested, Oceania was at war with Eastasia.'

'With Eastasia. Good. And Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia, has it not?'

Winston drew in his breath. He opened his mouth to speak and then did not speak. He could not take his eyes away from the dial.

'The truth, please, Winston. Your truth. Tell me what you think you remember.'

'I remember that until only a week before I was arrested, we were not at war with Eastasia at all. We were in alliance with them. The war was against Eurasia. That had lasted for four years. Before that --'

O'Brien stopped him with a movement of the hand.

'Another example,' he said. 'Some years ago you had a very serious delusion indeed. You believed that three men, three onetime Party members named Jones, Aaronson, and Rutherford men who were executed for treachery and sabotage after making the fullest possible confession -- were not guilty of the crimes they were charged with. You believed that you had seen unmistakable documentary evidence proving that their confessions were false. There was a certain photograph about which you had a hallucination. You believed that you had actually held it in your hands. It was a photograph something like this.'

An oblong slip of newspaper had appeared between O'Brien's fingers. For perhaps five seconds it was within the angle of Winston's vision. It was a photograph, and there was no question of its identity. It was the photograph. It was another copy of the photograph of Jones, Aaronson, and Rutherford at the party function in New York, which he had chanced upon eleven years ago and promptly destroyed. For only an instant it was before his eyes, then it was out of sight again. But he had seen it, unquestionably he had seen it! He made a desperate, agonizing effort to wrench the top half of his body free. It was impossible to move so much as a centimetre in any direction. For the moment he had even forgotten the dial. All he wanted was to hold the photograph in his fingers again, or at least to see it.

'It exists!' he cried.

'No,' said O'Brien.

He stepped across the room. There was a memory hole in the opposite wall. O'Brien lifted the grating. Unseen, the frail slip of paper was whirling away on the current of warm air; it was vanishing in a flash of flame. O'Brien turned away from the wall.

'Ashes,' he said. 'Not even identifiable ashes. Dust. It does not exist. It never existed.'

'But it did exist! It does exist! It exists in memory. I remember it. You remember it.'

'I do not remember it,' said O'Brien.

If the information does not exist, then it is our word against theirs. Memory and attention spans of the right-wingers has, I'm sure you've noticed, gotten remarkably short of late.

I'm starting to believe that the majority of the population is controlled by the media. Not fully, mind you, but they must have skilled social scientists working for them who know exactly where to push and how hard to focus and redirect people's attention. Observe the orchestrated response to the Osama tapes. Or the Holloway case. Or a crying Mrs Alito. They know exactly which buttons to push and they will push those buttons and succeed and the public will never remember the accuracy of what happened. How many times has it happened to you? How many times have you talked to a Republican family member or coworker, and tried to bring up something that to you is big news that you're well informed on, and either they have never heard of it or they believe a distorted view of it that has been pushed by the media (like Abramoff and Democrats), and how many times have you wondered how that is even possible?

They have no need for a single monolithic Ministry of Truth. The media is in their pocket.

(Thanks to http://www.online-literature.com/... for the excerpts, apparently 1984 is public domain now. Sweet. Go read!)

Poll

What do you think?

47%24 votes
15%8 votes
35%18 votes
1%1 votes

| 51 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: 1984, George Orwell, information control (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 22 comments

  •  Tip Jar (4.00 / 7)

    My memory is bad genetically, what's their excuse?

    OEF/OIF vet
    I've been called a left-wing extremist because I absolutely oppose torture. I can live with that.

    by jabbausaf on Sun Jan 22, 2006 at 01:36:33 PM PDT

  •  I don't think there's an overarching conspiracy (4.00 / 2)

    But that actually makes things a bit MORE like the book, not less. As pointed out in the sections you quoted, there wasn't a vast, all-encompassing group that made the decisions in 1984 - the existance of the memoryhole, and the people's acceptance of it, was mostly spontaneous. There was no need to direct the people to rip down the 'wrong' banners, or fix the 'incorrect' newstories - people took it upon themselves to do it, in order to protect their worldview (that their country is ALWAYS correct.)

    Possibly this was your intent when you were writing this, but you weren't very clear about it, so I thought I would clarify.

    •  Indeed it was (none / 1)

      I'd be curious to know how it is that everyone thinks in unison like that, but I suspect that's a question better answered by social science profs. It may go back to our primate roots, when a whole group of apes would react as one to an outside threat. And really, more then having a conspiracy that you have to maintain tight control over, and that may be revealed at some point, it is much better, easier, and safer to simply to change everyone's way of thinking subtly over time. There may be people who are aware of this and who work to maintain this situation, but that's probably as far as it goes.

      OEF/OIF vet
      I've been called a left-wing extremist because I absolutely oppose torture. I can live with that.

      by jabbausaf on Sun Jan 22, 2006 at 01:59:09 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  More Recent Than Apes (none / 1)

        One doesn't have to go back to primate roots to understand this mentality. Consider these excerpts from The Golden Bough by James Frazer.

        http://www.gutenberg.org/...

        From Section III: Sympathetic Magic, Part 2: Homoeopathic or Imitative Magic

        Where beliefs like these prevail as to the sympathetic connexion between friends at a distance, we need not wonder that above everything else war, with its stern yet stirring appeal to some of the deepest and tenderest of human emotions, should quicken in the anxious relations left behind a desire to turn the sympathetic bond to the utmost account for the benefit of the dear ones who may at any moment be fighting and dying far away. Hence, to secure an end so natural and laudable, friends at home are apt to resort to devices which will strike us as pathetic or ludicrous, according as we consider their object or the means adopted to effect it...Among the Tshi-speaking peoples of the Gold Coast the wives of men who are away with the army paint themselves white, and adorn their persons with beads and charms. On the day when a battle is expected to take place, they run about armed with guns, or sticks carved to look like guns, and taking green paw-paws (fruits shaped somewhat like a melon), they hack them with knives, as if they were chopping off the heads of the foe. The pantomime is no doubt merely an imitative charm, to enable the men to do to the enemy as the women do to the paw-paws.

        Frazer notes numerous other examples, where citizens of the homeland engage in sympathetic behaviors (magic) to ensure the success of their troops. It is imperative, from this perspective, to keep on dancing or your troops will weaken.

        No wonder that so many Americans believe that war protest are actually hurting the troops, not just figuratively, but literally, by refusing to join in the 'war dance.'

        •  That's very interesting (none / 0)

          Thanks, I have learned something. I'm not entirely unfamiliar with sympathetic magic, but this is a direction I had not been thinking in.

          OEF/OIF vet
          I've been called a left-wing extremist because I absolutely oppose torture. I can live with that.

          by jabbausaf on Sun Jan 22, 2006 at 05:24:10 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  What you are saying is they are behind schedule?.. (none / 0)

    ...This was all supposed to happen in the first term of the Reagan administration...?

    ...Isn't this still the first term of the Reagan administration...?

    ...ok then,...nevermind...

    Live Free or Die --- Investigate, Impeach, Incarcerate

    by rktect on Sun Jan 22, 2006 at 01:50:25 PM PDT

    •  1984 (none / 1)

      Is the name of a book by George Orwell that details the nature and upkeeping of a totalitarian society, and gave rise to the term "Orwellian".

      OEF/OIF vet
      I've been called a left-wing extremist because I absolutely oppose torture. I can live with that.

      by jabbausaf on Sun Jan 22, 2006 at 02:01:16 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  yeah, it was written back in1948 (none / 0)

        Orwell thought of the future as a Brave New World where attitudes and values would be a little different.

        In 1948 when he had it published the US Supreme court was ruling that religious instruction in public schools violated the Constitution.

        The Hells Angels were forming a motorcycle club in Califoria.

        Israel became an independant state after Arab militants laid siege to the Jewish Quarter of the Old City of Jerusalem.

        Mahatma Ghandi was murdured.

        Terrorists began hijacking airliners in Oceanasia.

        The US Air Force Office of Special Investigations was founded.

        The neo cons began to propagandize about the Red Menace causing the Russians to block their Voice of America  broadcasts, take over Checkoslavakia and begin forming the iron curtain.

        Live Free or Die --- Investigate, Impeach, Incarcerate

        by rktect on Sun Jan 22, 2006 at 02:30:03 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  AFOSI (none / 0)

          The US Air Force Office of Special Investigations was founded.

          Actually, that's not all that unusual. The Air Force split off from the Army and became an independent branch of service in 1947, and every branch of service has an equivalent of OSI. The Navy for example has NCIS. There's a lot of reasons for this.  Security Forces, while it is also does a lot of law enforcement, is primarily intended for base defense. They do not have the time or the people for in-depth criminal investigations, that is what OSI is used for. It's a lot like the relationship between the FBI and local law enforcement. While there is a possibility for misuse, there is nothing inherently wrong with OSI, and they fill an important role in the Air Force.

          OEF/OIF vet
          I've been called a left-wing extremist because I absolutely oppose torture. I can live with that.

          by jabbausaf on Sun Jan 22, 2006 at 02:47:00 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  The reason I list them... (none / 0)

            ...Is that on the page where they list the Air Force and Air National Guard Deserters... they don't list Bush.

            http://public.afosi.amc.af.mil/...

            Live Free or Die --- Investigate, Impeach, Incarcerate

            by rktect on Sun Jan 22, 2006 at 04:03:12 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  Ah, gotcha (none / 0)

              No problem.

              I frequently find myself having to defend the more benign aspects of the military, wasn't sure if you included them as being aspects of a shadowy society contolling organization or what.

              OEF/OIF vet
              I've been called a left-wing extremist because I absolutely oppose torture. I can live with that.

              by jabbausaf on Sun Jan 22, 2006 at 05:23:29 PM PDT

              [ Parent ]

              •  Sure lets go with that... (none / 0)

                Right now we have a Defense Department that costs as much to maintain as all of Health and Human Services combined?

                With all that force we couldn't find Osama bin Ladin.

                Partly thats because we have a totally incompetent administration, but partly its because we have too many people trying to do too many things in too many places fighting threats that aren't really there and spying on Americans.

                Having a large force in Iraq just means we have more targets for IED's and rocket propelled grenades.

                27,000 allied casualties, 7000 wounded too badly to return to combat more than 2100 killed and a couple of trillion dollars in long range costs.

                We would have been better off to issue Letters of Margue to privateers to go after guys like Osama and then we could stay out of places like Iraq and Iran and Pakistan.

                We don't need to support dictators like Saddam Hussein, and Noreiga. We don't need to support force extenders like Osama bin Ladin. We don't need to overthrow freely elected government s in south America and supply death squads and sell weapons to dictators.

                Given thats the world situation today what's the Defense Department there to defend us from?

                We are the sole remaining super power. We don't need to maintain a 600 ship navy, we don't need nuclear submarines that can or SAC.

                For pirates like Osama we can use volunteer forces. We no longer need a standing army and we especially don't need it under the control of a unitary executive.

                We should go back to milita and leave their control under the Congress as our constitution intended.

                It may be hard on the military industrial complex which has grown to think of itself as entitled to gorge itself on pork.

                Pork for bases all over the world. Pork for missles and planes and tanks and ammunition and uniforms, and Halliburton, and research and development that has resulted in things like putting our troops in humvees with improper armor.

                Defend to me why we need 30 some odd intelligence services with payrolls of some 58,000 people each all pulling down 6 figure salaries.

                Getting rid of the Defense Department completely and putting the money back into Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, Community Health Centers, Education, Family Planning Clinics, New Markets Tax credits and Neighborhood Synergy to build infrastructure for economically depressed areas all over the world would probably do more to make this world secure than any military weapon.

                Live Free or Die --- Investigate, Impeach, Incarcerate

                by rktect on Sun Jan 22, 2006 at 06:03:45 PM PDT

                [ Parent ]

                •  All very good points (none / 0)

                  But OSI exists for things like finding airmen who peddle child porn, busting drug rings inside the Air Force, rooting out corruption and major crimes, doing all the detective work.

                  Each military base is like it's own city, and needs its own police force. As long as you have a military, you'll need the investigative departments of each of those branches. AFOSI, and it's counterparts in other branches of service, are not people pulling down 6 figure salaries. Everyone in OSI at least, for the most part, is enlisted or an officer. Ranks are kept classified so a suspect can't try to "pull rank" to intimidate an investigator. OSI is not an intelligence service, it's a detective service. The Air Force has departments that deal with Intel.

                  Now, it may be that we don't need military bases or a military the size that it is. I personally would prefer to have militias and Guardsmen. But as long as we have a military like we do now, we need things in that military like OSI. It's like saying that we wouldn't need to have large police departments in major cities like New York if people didn't have major cities like New York. It may be true, but as long as New York is there, it needs an NYPD.

                  OEF/OIF vet
                  I've been called a left-wing extremist because I absolutely oppose torture. I can live with that.

                  by jabbausaf on Mon Jan 23, 2006 at 12:44:51 AM PDT

                  [ Parent ]

                  •  What would we do without police? (none / 0)

                    Maybe we should just simplify policing out populations, the way they do in big cities.

                    In some neighborhoods they take any kid they don't recognize, and arrest him on grounds of suspicious activity.

                    For example if they see him running or, hitching up his pants, or wearing anything that looks odd like sneakers, well as the police see it, those are all markers of a gun toting gang member, rather than normal behavior for a kid.

                    They take him down hard.

                    Then they photograph him, categorize him as a gang member according to what color ball cap or jacket or shirt the kid wears and place him in the system.

                    Thereafter as a known gang member they figure they have probable cause for search or seizure on sight.

                    If the kid goes for a job his known gang affiliation means he's gonna get caught by most employment and college admission filters.

                    If we had legalized drugs in the sixties there wouldn't have been any money in it for drug cartels and all this violence in the inner cities and a lot of the problems with the AIDS epidemic wouldn't have been their either.

                    Think about the difference between the bathtub gin of prohibition and the violence of bootleggers and being able to just go buy a bottle of scotch malt in a store.

                    Some people do abuse alcohol, but we don't have gangs shooting it out in the streets with machine guns to control their scotch malt turf.

                    If we had gotten rid of the Defense Department then and spent the money on Neighborhood Synergy, then, we wouldn't have people looting its armories to sell guns to inner cities gangs.

                    Police exist primarily to enforce institutionalized morality and property laws.

                    If we did away with those kinds of laws there would be a lot less people forceded into institutionalized poverty and made a burden on the system by crimes of frustration, rage and violence.

                    Its a lot cheaper to educate a kid than to lock him up for life.

                    Live Free or Die --- Investigate, Impeach, Incarcerate

                    by rktect on Mon Jan 23, 2006 at 06:13:15 AM PDT

                    [ Parent ]

                    •  Again, quite possibly (none / 0)

                      But as long as we have the systems in place that we have, we'll need police. As long as we have the kind of military that we have, we'll need OSI to do the investigation work. If you want the dissolution of the DoD, work towards that politically, but as long as it exists there are things it needs to function. If you think you can abolish the police force, by all means go for it. I've never really liked cops anyway. I've been stopped plenty of times by cops for being in the wrong place at the wrong time, and while not charged with anything, it is very annoying and reminds me that we live in a police state. Preaching about the problems with a police force is great and I do agree, but you're not going to be able to get rid of them because most of the people in our country aren't ready to live without a police force. As for the DoD, a lot of money is wasted in having one I'm sure, but with OSI, less money is wasted, as they're the ones who investigate embezzlement, fraud, waste, theft, things like that. If somebody is shunting Air Force funds into his pocket, OSI is who goes after him.

                      It would be great not to need a police force, and I for one have never had a use for them. It would be great not to need a DoD. Hopefully someday our society can mature to that point.

                      OEF/OIF vet
                      I've been called a left-wing extremist because I absolutely oppose torture. I can live with that.

                      by jabbausaf on Mon Jan 23, 2006 at 01:36:32 PM PDT

                      [ Parent ]

                      •  I don't think we really disagree... (none / 0)

                        Except maybe as to whether its a good argument against something that you agree with that somebody else might not agree.

                        Look at it in terms of filibustering Alito. Might have the votes, might not. Is it worth doing anyway? Damm straight.

                        Will it succeed? Well if its going to happen and people know that, win lose or draw they may not want it known that they were the ones with the cold feet that screwed it all up for everybody else.

                        Ok, I'm j walking instead of staying on the curb, and maybe I'll get hit, maybe I won't but most cars back off...and those that don't usually apologize afterward...

                        Live Free or Die --- Investigate, Impeach, Incarcerate

                        by rktect on Mon Jan 23, 2006 at 06:47:58 PM PDT

                        [ Parent ]

  •  It is a curious thing that the Right are content (4.00 / 3)

    ...that no evidence that George W. Bush walked away from his military service before his term was over has been allowed to overwhelm them.

    And this is the curious thing about it: that despite the Department of Defense's excellent reputation for record-keeping, they are content even though no positive evidence that he did his duty has ever been presented.

    •  Clearly your memory is imperfect (none / 1)

      George Bush served honorably and without reproach.

      Any evidence to the contrary is a figment of your imagination.

      OEF/OIF vet
      I've been called a left-wing extremist because I absolutely oppose torture. I can live with that.

      by jabbausaf on Sun Jan 22, 2006 at 02:48:35 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  The right are content (none / 1)

      Now that stopped me. You are right, they are content with everything the administration does with never a question - that 40% that still support Bush. That group puzzles me. Why are they so content? So unwilling to see the down side of what is happening? Is it fear of facing reality? Fear of having to change one's position? Better not to see and question, just be content, close your eyes and ears and hum loudly.

      The Justice Department is no longer a credible defender of the rule of law or the Constitution.

      by Overseas on Sun Jan 22, 2006 at 02:55:19 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Hurts to admit, but (none / 0)

        They are the proles.

        OEF/OIF vet
        I've been called a left-wing extremist because I absolutely oppose torture. I can live with that.

        by jabbausaf on Sun Jan 22, 2006 at 03:22:53 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  The proles in Orwell's novel... (none / 0)

          ...if I remember correctly, weren't content, just fatalistic, cynical and, therefore, irrelevant. Much as it hurts to admit it, that could describe as many of the people who respond "disapprove" to those presidential polls as respond "approve".

          All that mattered to Big Brother was that the Party members were kept in line. As long as that were taken care of, the proles would cause no trouble.

Permalink | 22 comments