Daily Kos

Is China Backing away from the Dollar?

Thu Jan 05, 2006 at 11:54:52 PM PDT

Interpreting the signals from the Beijing mandarins is closely akin to reading tea leaves at the bottom of a mineshaft, buried in ten feet of mud, while wearing a blindfold. But The Financial Times think they've struck prophesy in a statement from China's State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE), headed by the recently appointed female Director, and Deputy Governor of the People's Bank of China (PBC), Hu Xiaolian.

In a brief statement on its website, the government's foreign exchange regulator said one of its targets for 2006 was to “improve the operation and management of foreign exchange reserves and to actively explore more effective ways to utilise reserve assets”.

It went on: “[The objective is] to improve the currency structure and asset structure of our foreign exchange reserves, and to continue to expand the investment area of reserves.

Now what in the world could this fortune cookie mean? Well it could be read to mean that China is intending to diversify their reserve holdings away from the US dollar, which according to most economists make up about 70% of total holdings, but which in my opinion is probably even a bit north of that.

Now this massive hoarding of dollar assets has been instrumental in financing the US current account deficit, keeping interest rates down, and probably one of the main factors in the recent inversion of the yield curve.

A Chinese diversification, if it indeed materialises, would of course put downward pressure on the dollar, which has shown some signs of faltering lately, after having had a good last year, paradoxically partly due to higher oil prices, as the sheiks largely parked their surpluses in US debt instruments.

Such a move would be bearish for the dollar. But while a falling currency carries with it a number of problems and risks (the trade deficit would for example widen, at least in the short term, as more green paper would have to be exchanged for all foreign imports, such as oil), it would make life easier for the US export industry. It wouldn't be half bad for a government up to its gums in dollar denominated debt either.

The Powers That Be in Washington have been on Beijing's back for quite a while now, trying to convince them to stop intervening in the currency market to prop up the dollar versus their own currency, the yuan/renmimbi. So far it's been met with run-arounds and smoke and mirrors and an unpegging from the dollar in favour of pegging the yuan to a basket of currencies, which seems to consist of... 98% dollars. But this might be about to change.

The statement comes at a time of growing debate in China on how the reserves are invested. Some economists have called on Beijing to use the funds to finance infrastructure investment and clean up state-owned companies, or to invest in higher-yielding assets rather than financing US borrowing.

However, according to Stephen Green, economist for Standard Chartered in Shanghai, although the language was “vague”, Thursday's statement was the first time Safe has publicly indicated a shift away from dollar assets.

“It is a subtle but clear signal that they are interested in moving away from the US dollar into other currencies, and are interested in setting up some kind of strategic commodity fund, maybe just for oil, but maybe for other commodities,” he said.

This would also chime with recent Chinese moves to loosen restrictions on market trading of the yuan, as recently reported in The Wall Street Journal(subscription required):

BEIJING -- China will allow the yuan to be traded over the counter for interbank spot forex trading starting Wednesday, the country's central bank said Tuesday.
China will publish yuan benchmark rates each trading day versus the U.S. dollar, euro, Japanese yen, and Hong Kong dollar, the People's Bank of China said in a statement on its Web site.
The new trading system is another step toward giving market forces a larger role in determining the value of the yuan, and making the market for the currency more flexible.



This article is also available at Bitsofnews.com and The Booman Tribune.

Tags: China, Deficit, Trade, Dollar, Yuan, Renminbi, Currency, Economy (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 37 comments

  •  Now... (none / 0)

    ...to I have to figure out how to get paid in a non US$ currency...

    Euros? Swiss Francs? Yen? hmmm....

    ___
    To achieve the impossible, it is precisely the unthinkable that must be thought.
    ~Tom Robbins

    Conlige suspectos semper habitos

    by Marcus Junius Brutus on Thu Jan 05, 2006 at 11:59:31 PM PDT

  •  Like a (lead?) Balloon (4.00 / 4)

    The dollar has defied gravity for quite a while so far.

    The question is, does that mean a drop is getting closer, or is there really helium in them thar bills?

    ;)

  •  I guess Walmart... (none / 1)

    will have to start buying all that plastic crap from China in Yuans.

    On a more serious note (I think)... I read on this board (a la jerome a paris?) that china had 3 suppliers for energy before the iraq war, and now has like 38 or so.

    While we while our days away waving our precious American flags and fighting wars that don't need figthing (gay marriage, iraq)... we done got overtaken economically.

    Go bush!

    Every dollar a for-profit insurance company spends on your care, is a dollar that goes against the coroporate balance sheet. --nyceve

    by letsfight on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 12:16:36 AM PDT

    •  go bush indeed (4.00 / 3)

      You know the end of Trading Places?

      I could just see at the end of 8 years:

      "Dick and I bet on whether we could completely fuck the country in every way possible in a mere 8 years."

      "George won. I thought we couldn't do it. Here you go George. $1"

    •  A little bit Inflation (none / 1)

      It seems like what they (meaning the Federal Reserve and the Administration) are trying to do, apart from giving the export sector a boost, and apart from having little choice due to earlier questionable calls, is to engineer a controlled inflation.

      But I remain skeptical on the tonic effects of even the controlled inflation they are going for, aside from the fact that it's very hard to undermine the confidence in your currency... a little bit. Seeing as imbalances abound in the global economy, there are so many things that can go "Murphy" at just the wrong moment, it's like playing Russian roulette with a machine gun.

      And for the export sector to benefit in a big enough way for it to offset the negatives of a dollar decline, there would have to be a vital export industry, and capital looking to invest in it. I just don't see that. In fact, I think the Chinese, and other Asian countries, could allow a sizable appreciation of their currencies at this time, and still grow their exports faster than the US.

      •  "engineer a controlled inflation..." (none / 1)

        ...kinda like:

        • engineer a controlled taxation (tax cuts)
        • engineer a controlled invasion (Iraq)
        • engineer a controlled occupation (Iraq)
        • engineer a controlled election (Iraq)
        • engineer a controlled evacuation (New Orleans)

        I think we're headed for the worst of "controlled" iterations.
  •  recommended (none / 0)

    thanks.

    It'd be great if you could also add what this would mean for average americans in terms of our everyday lives :)

    •  Our dollars buy less stuff... (none / 0)

      ...maybe alot less stuff.
    •  I would say... (none / 0)

      ..that if you do not recover your international standing (and the onlt way to do that is put Bush in the  Hague) then within three years, five at the outside you will be looking at petrol at $50 a gallon.  And tat will jsut be the start.  Twelve months after that it will double (at least).

      Truckle the Uncivil, Nullus Anxietas Sanguinae. Economic Left/Right: -3.38 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.00

      by Truckle on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 01:13:13 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Recommended. Big News. (none / 0)


    ...though given the hour it'll probably fall into the abyss and get scooed up by bondad or Jerome tomorrow.  But heck, it's worth a try.  Thanks for the diligent post!

    Oh, and: Man, are we screwed.

    Ignorance is Curable.

    by skids on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 12:40:50 AM PDT

  •  cassandra flash: (4.00 / 2)

    china and the u.s. have been adversaries for many years - and, inspite of the "free trade", there is STILL the "you are our enemy" feelings.

    so, how does one defeat an enemy in the modern world?  OBL has shown the rest of the world how:  attack america economically.

    we are a shadow of our former nation, our military is stretched beyond capacity, our economy is based on borrowing from china, our infrastructure is falling apart, we have no money to rebuild after natural disasters (which, btw, have been exacerbated by our having no money to MAINTAIN that infrastructure).

    so, what should china do?  bomb us while we are week?  send planes to our shores?

    nope.  they don't have to.  the world wouldn't LIKE that - but IF they simply pull the economic rug out from underneath the nation, well, europe has the euro - china can diversify currency - and america falls flat on her face - weakened, unable to sustain a viable at home economy unless propped up by foreign loans.

    sigh.  we may already be too late to stop "w" from bankrupting the nation - hopefully we will somehow survive.

    •  Yes, I've gathered as much. (none / 0)

      And though she's a "lifer" and the consumate insider, she seems to be one of foremost of those pushing for a faster pace of reform.

      And she seems to have the ear of the very top. Things might actually start moving at a brisker trot. Though according to which strategic plan?

      Someone to keep an eye on.

  •  Capitalists will sell us the rope to hang them (4.00 / 3)

    And indeed, it seems the Bushistas have sold enough rope to China to do the job very handily.

    Our military has been broken and bleeds on the sands of Iraq, while the oil stays firmly in the ground there - waiting for a friendlier nation to exploit it.

    The Chinese are now more trusted in all global surveys of public opinion than the Americans, except in a very few nations including Israel, Poland and Mexico.

    And China has been exercising very quiet petro-diplomacy, trading technology and infrastructure to get assured access to oil and natural gas from nations all over the globe.

    Add to this that China and India are making it public policy to build new infrastructure and factories to higher standards of fuel efficiency than the United States achieve with its legacy transport systems and lack of coordination.

    America is a waning force in the world.  It's day is passing.  Like Germany at the turn of the last century, and post-war Britain, and the USSR in the 1980s, the USA is losing its economic dominance, its diplomatic influence, its military might and its moral authority to a new order.

    Our best hope would be a strong and effective United Nations to ensure that the order that emerges provides a certain degree of protection to all, but this is antithetical to the America-firsters.  The UN would have safeguarded a weak America as it has safeguarded those we have weakened ourselves.  We will regret undermining it soon enough.

    "Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" - Abraham Lincoln

    by LondonYank on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 03:50:49 AM PDT

  •  Why should China listen to (none / 0)

    what BushCo wants?  Who are we to demand anything of China?

    China is smart to back away from the dollar.  The Saudis are doing the same thing.  There was a diary here in late summer that told of the Saudis bringing home like $3 billion or so and converting it OUT of dollars.

    You'll see other countries slowly backing away from the dollar in 2006.

    Hu is a very smart woman, and with her firmly in charge now, China will become a great economic power in the world.  We're screwed.

    If the people lead, the leaders will follow.

    by Mz Kleen on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 04:12:50 AM PDT

    •  Will become? (none / 0)

      It's already passed UK and France for economic output.  

      Instead of the American business' quarterly focus, China has a quarter-century focus.  What does GW Bush want America to look like in 25 years (besides something from Judge Dredd)?  He can't even figure out what pair of underoos to wear tomorrow

      "now this is not the end, it is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." W. Churchill

      by Thor Heyerdahl on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 04:27:09 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  China is on a path to being (none / 0)

        the greatest economic power in the world.  It won't take them long to achieve that goal.

        And us?  We are rapidly descending to the status of a 3rd world country with BushCo in charge.  We're toast.

        If the people lead, the leaders will follow.

        by Mz Kleen on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 05:37:38 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  The falling dollar could mean more tourists (none / 0)

    But - since many of them have apprehensions of visiting the US due to GW Bush's TWAT (tyrannical war against terror), many pick other locations.

    "now this is not the end, it is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." W. Churchill

    by Thor Heyerdahl on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 04:22:19 AM PDT

  •  As bondad and Jerome (none / 0)

    have pointed out, Russia and China have been strenghtening their economic/energy ties to Iran for several years.  Iran will attempt to open an oil bourse in March, trading in Euros rather than dollars.  If this comes to pass (i.e., if the Bushies or Israel don't bomb Iran first, using the nuclear weapons pretext), then many countries, beginning with China, could move their cash reserves substantially away from the dollar into Euros in order to trade on the new bourse.  Perhaps these statements from China are a "pre-positioning."

    Even though the dollar has become weaker, the trade deficit has not shrunk.  This is partly attributable to continuing (debt-financed) consumer purchasing of cheap plastic crap from Wal-Mart and to the increased cost of oil, but it also partly due to the fact that nearly all computer equipment and manufacturing equipment (machine tools, etc.) are now imported, primarily from SE Asia.

    The wealthy are unlikely to make job-creating investments in the US.  Such investment requires a perceived ROI. Jobs depend on production and production depends on demand.  Demand depends on sales.  With consumer real-wages stagnant and consumers in debt up to their eyeballs (much of which debt is backed by inflated housing values that are likely to fall soon), consumer purchasing power is at an all-time low and liekly to sink even further.  No purchasing power = no sales = no demand = no production = no ROI = no investment = no jobs.  

    With the prospect of the dollar becoming even weaker and the Euro becoming stronger with a potential shift in oil-trading from dollars to Euros, the wealthy are more likely to invest in Euros (than in American job-creation), thus accelerating a downward spiral for the US dollar and attendant consequences for the Bush-mismanaged US economy, consequences that will fall hardest on the US middle-class and below.

    Some folks prefer a map and finding their own route. Others need someone to tell them where to go.

    by sxwarren on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 04:43:56 AM PDT

    •  Logical response (none / 0)

      The rumblings to trade oil in Euros has been around for awhile...

      All the king's horses and all the king's men...package and sell it to win it again...

      by MP Three on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 05:40:47 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  And, someday (none / 0)

        someone is really going to do it.  The pressure to break US domination in all World socio-political contexts is much grater now than it ever has been, thanks to Bush's foreign policy.  Russia and China have a lot to gain from a successful Iranian oil bourse trading in Euros and the timing couldn't be better for them.

        Some folks prefer a map and finding their own route. Others need someone to tell them where to go.

        by sxwarren on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 01:01:20 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  morality and money (none / 0)

    The day we separate morality from money, is the day we will finally make decisions that will help the most people (maybe not the greedy mofos, is all).  A dollar is a piece of human sovereignty, not a piece of royal sovereignty.

    The only way to change this country is if money follows politics, not the other way around.

    by jcrit on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 05:24:35 AM PDT

  •  You say: (none / 0)

    "a falling currency ... would make life easier for the US export industry."

    That remark is not really born up by export performance during the recent period when the euro went as high as $1.35. Current account deficits never even faltered, but, like the Energizer Bunny, kept growing and growing and growing.

    Comment?

    We cannot win a war crime - Dancewater, July 27, 2008

    by unclejohn on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 05:29:42 AM PDT

  •  Interest rates (none / 0)

    As mentioned in the diary, this ties in to the large Chinese (and other foreign central bank) purchases of US treasuries over recent years.  It will be very interesting to see if/how this affects the bond market, and thus US interest rates, and therefore the housing market.  While a weaker USD is a postive for exporters, sharply higher rates would be rough on the economy.  
    •  China has also been buying (none / 0)

      significant quantites of US home mortgage paper.  If a bad bust happens and folks here who are leveraged to their eyeballs can't make their payments, a lot of the foreclosure notices will be coming from companies owned by the Chinese.  They could end up owning a lot of North American real estate.  Cheap.

      Some folks prefer a map and finding their own route. Others need someone to tell them where to go.

      by sxwarren on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 01:05:46 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Permalink | 37 comments