Skip to main content

If you want to vote for minority parties, by all means do so, but first you should either reform the U.S. election system to accommodate third parties or you should take up citizenship in some foreign country.

Good old Joe Green showed up at Baileys, sauntered up to the table and threw a C-note on the table to exchange for a small pile of blue chips.  Joe peeked at the first card the dealer put in front of him - a king of diamonds.  Good start, Joe thought to himself.  On the second round of cards, Joe saw he had be dealt the queen of diamonds and on the third the ace.

With spirits high, Joe slapped three of his $10 chips on the table, urged the dealer to continue dealing and subsequently raised that with two more.  By the time he had been dealt five cards and he saw a royal flush in his hand he had bet not only the full $100 that he started with but had put another $5000 on his credit card.  His excitement was at a peak when the cards were called and the dealer raked in all of his chips.  When Joe protested, the dealer said: this is a blackjack table; don't you know the rules?  Joe protested that he preferred the rules of draw poker and casino security dragged him kicking and screaming out of the Reno casino.


Joe Green also plans to vote for the Green party Senate and House candidates in this November's election and he is making the same mistake he made at the blackjack table.  He is confused about what game he is playing.

U.S. election rules to not accommodate third party candidates.  That little dot is a period  (just in case you missed it).

Those who vote for third party candidates are just like poker players who are playing by draw-poker rules at a black-jack table.  They will lose.  Unfortunately the stakes are higher than in Reno and the rest of the country will loose as well.

You cannot just look at other countries where voting for third party candidates is sensible and conclude that doing so is sensible in America.  The election rules in other countries are not the same as here.  Other countries have parliamentary systems or they have proportional representation in their legislatures or they have instant runoff voting.  The U.S. electoral system has none of these more modern systems but is stuck with and electoral system that truly was the state of the art in 1776.  

If you want to vote for minority parties, by all means do so, but first you should either reform the U.S. election system to accommodate third parties or you should take up citizenship in some foreign country that is playing by the rules that you prefer.  To do otherwise is to ensure that we all lose.

Originally posted to MainePaco on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 07:05 PM PDT.


Do you plan to vote

86%13 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes
6%1 votes
6%1 votes

| 15 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Ditto for voting for "good" Republicans (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    tlh lib

    Because the only good Republican, is a retired Republican.

  •  Actually (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    tlh lib, dus7

    Reforming the single member district winner take all system would be a great idea and would probably result in more participation in politics.  

    "The struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting." Milan Kedrun

    by Guy Fawkes on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 07:31:20 PM PDT

  •  Beautiful diary (0+ / 0-)

    and beautiful analogy, MainePaco.  I Recommend.

    Hey ... get up ... and remember ... 9/11 changed nothing.

    by CalbraithRodgers on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 08:03:22 PM PDT

  •  People like to kid themselves (0+ / 0-)

    that they vote for the best person, but I have yet to meet a re-thug who was the best person.  Don't get me wrong, some Dems. aren't anything to write home about, but they are always better than Republicants.

    Don't attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

    by jasfm on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 10:11:24 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site