Daily Kos

Cheney Task Force Planned Iraq Oil Grab

Tue Oct 17, 2006 at 08:42:43 AM PDT

Why did Darth Cheney fight so hard to keep his Energy Task Force meetings secret?  It looks like the reasons went beyond his belief in the Unitary Dictator.  The Cheney Cabal carved up Iraq into nine OIL areas, and mapped out the future exploitation for four big multi-national oil companies. From Joshua Holland on alternet:
http://www.truthout.org/...

Iraq is sitting on a mother lode of some of the lightest, sweetest, most profitable crude oil on earth, and the rules that will determine who will control it and on what terms are about to be set.

  More of the details in the extended body, this is a compelling story that clearly connects the dots behind the Bush/Cheney Iraq Oil Grab.

And now the scramble to lock in Iraq's oil for the Big Oil cronies of Bush/Cheney:
   The Iraqi government faces a December deadline, imposed by the world's wealthiest countries, to complete its final Oil Law. Industry analysts expect that the result will be a radical departure from the laws governing the country's oil-rich neighbors, giving foreign multinationals a much higher rate of return than with other major oil producers, and locking in their control over what George Bush called Iraq's "patrimony" for decades, regardless of what kind of policies future elected governments might want to pursue.

more from Joshua Holland's article:
Iraqi oil is close to the surface and easy to extract, making it all the more profitable. James Paul, Executive Director of the Global Policy Forum, points out that oil companies "can produce a barrel of Iraqi oil for less than $1.50 and possibly as little as $1, including all exploration, oilfield development and production costs." Contrast that with other areas where oil is considered cheap to produce at $5 per barrel, or the North Sea where production costs are $12-16 per barrel.

    And Iraq's oil sector is largely undeveloped. Former Iraqi Oil Minister Issam Chalabi (no relation to the neocons' favorite exile, Ahmed Chalabi) told the Associated Press that "Iraq has more oil fields that have been discovered, but not developed, than any other country in the world." British-based analyst Mohammad Al-Gallani told the Canadian Press that of 526 prospective drilling sites, just 125 have been opened.

    But the real gem - what one oil consultant called the "Holy Grail" of the industry - lies in Iraq's vast Western desert. It's one of the last "virgin" fields on the planet, and it has the potential to catapult Iraq to number one in the world in oil reserves. Sparsely populated, the Western fields are less prone to sabotage than the country's current centers of production in the North, near Kirkuk, and in the South near Basra. The Nation's Aram Roston predicts Iraq's Western desert will yield "untold riches."

And naturally the Bush/Cheney folks wanted to grab this oil, the planning started in Cheney's infamous "Energy Task Force".  

But serious planning for the war had begun in February of 2002, as Bob Woodward revealed in his book, Plan of Attack. Planning for the future of Iraq's oil wealth had been under way for longer still.

    In February of 2001, just weeks after Bush was sworn in, the same energy executives that had been lobbying for Saddam's ouster gathered at the White House to participate in Dick Cheney's now infamous Energy Taskforce. Although Cheney would go all the way to the Supreme Court to keep what happened at those meetings a secret, we do know a few things thanks to documents obtained by the conservative legal group JudicialWatch. As Mark Levine wrote in The Nation($$):

    ... a map of Iraq and an accompanying list of "Iraq oil foreign suitors" were the center of discussion. The map erased all features of the country save the location of its main oil deposits, divided into nine exploration blocks. The accompanying list of suitors revealed that dozens of companies from thirty countries-but not the United States-were either in discussions over or in direct negotiations for rights to some of the best remaining oilfields on earth.

    Levine wrote, "It's not hard to surmise how the participants in these meetings felt about this situation."

The contracts had to ensure continued wealth and control for the Bush/Cheney cabal, here's how they planned that:

But the execs from Big Oil didn't just want access to Iraq's oil; they wanted access on terms that would be inconceivable unless negotiated at the barrel of a gun. Specifically, they wanted an Iraqi government that would enter into Production Service Agreements (PSAs) for the extraction of Iraq's oil.

    PSAs, developed in the 1960s, are a tool of today's kinder, gentler neocolonialism; they allow countries to retain technical ownership over energy reserves but, in actuality, lock in multinationals' control and extremely high profit margins - up to thirteen times oil companies' minimum target, according to an analysis by the British-based oil watchdog Platform (PDF).

    As Greg Muttit, an analyst with the group, notes:

    Such contracts are often used in countries with small or difficult oilfields, or where high-risk exploration is required. They are not generally used in countries like Iraq, where there are large fields which are already known and which are cheap to extract. For example, they are not used in Iran, Kuwait or Saudi Arabia, all of which maintain state control of oil.

    In fact, Muttit adds, of the seven leading oil producing countries, only Russia has entered into PSAs, and those were signed during its own economic "shock therapy" in the early 1990s. A number of Iraq's oil-rich neighbors have constitutions that specifically prohibit foreign control over their energy reserves.

    PSAs often have long terms - up to 40 years - and contain "stabilization clauses" that protect them from future legislative changes. As Muttit points out, future governments "could be constrained in their ability to pass new laws or policies." That means, for example, that if a future elected Iraqi government "wanted to pass a human rights law, or wanted to introduce a minimum wage [and it] affected the company's profits, either the law would not apply to the company's operations, or the government would have to compensate the company for any reduction in profits." It's Sovereignty Lite.

Please read the entire article on Alternet or Truthout, this really gets to the heart of the Bush/Cheney crimes in invading Iraq, and explains their preoccupation with Iraq to the exclusion of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and North Korea.  Yes, it truly is all about the oil.

Poll

Why did Bush invade Iraq?

38%36 votes
2%2 votes
1%1 votes
56%53 votes
0%0 votes
2%2 votes

| 94 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: Dick Cheney, Iraq, Oil, production sharing agreement, energy task force (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 43 comments

  •  Things will get uglier as oil contracts are set (6+ / 0-)

    The Iraqis are not stupid, and they see that the Cheney folks are planning to lock up their oil for years.  Of course there is virtually no reporting of this huge Oil Grab in the RWCM, they just continue to bray about Bush, "staying the course" in Iraq.

    Well how would we feel if an occupying force was about to steal our natural resources?

  •  Maybe, Maybe Not.. (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    libertyisliberal

    after all, the source is Truthout.  According to them, Karl Rove was indicted long ago.  You may want to check with Truthout to see if he's since been convicted.

    But, the source notwithstanding, my cynical soul tends to believe this.

    It is the folly of youth to think they can change the world; it is the folly of old age not to try. -- Winston Churchill

    by penguins4peace on Tue Oct 17, 2006 at 08:47:40 AM PDT

    •  Truthout rocks (0+ / 0-)

      Are you just being snarky?  Truthout gathers other news sources, this comes from Alternet.  But Truthout is an excellent source for reality based commentary.  So they were wrong once in one of their quoted sources, their record overall is quite good.

      •  Meh (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        trashablanca

        Truthout isn't as cool as it thinks it is. For "unverified" and/or "breaking" type stories, I like Raw Story.

        Founder of the Committee to Save asdf

        by droogie6655321 on Tue Oct 17, 2006 at 08:55:48 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Raw Story (0+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          trashablanca

          I keep that one bookmarked also, and generally find more historical or in depth stories linked on Truthout.  It sure is nice that at least the Bushies have left us all these internets for now.  I suppose they are busy tracking all of us, but hey, at least we can find the information.  

          The real problem is getting the TV-watchers of the US to realize the full extent of the Bushco criminality.

      •  Rarely Credible (4+ / 0-)

        I find Truthout's material to include too many paranoia-inspired conspiracy theories for my taste. Still, I see no bombshells in this one. Oil was one of the reasons we invaded Iraq? I'm shocked! Shocked!

        C'mon, oil is the only reason anyone in the world cares about the arabs. It's the only reason they can finance terrorists. It's the only reason they can send their kids to European universities where they can get radicalized and convinced to fly airplanes into our buildings.

        First time I've ever heard that Iraq's western desert may have enough oil to break the back of OPEC. Actually, if it were true it'd be about the best justificaiton for the invasion I've heard yet.

        Last time I checked, oil production had fallen back to between 2 million and 2.5 million barrels per day, well below pre-1990 levels. I guess that whole western desert thing hasn't panned out yet.

        •  And Iraqi crude is not really light, sweet. (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          Brain Donor

          it's got sulfur content too high to qualify as light sweet.

          I saw this post dissected on another thread . . . why not just wait until the Dems control Congress and they can subpoena all the minutes from the Cheney meetings.

          "we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex" Dwight D. Eisenhower

          by bobdevo on Tue Oct 17, 2006 at 10:10:39 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

    •  Hello. (6+ / 0-)

      Here are the first 26 of 143 results from the search of dKos stories and diaries containing "iraq oil energy task force Cheney".

      Note that I did not search the archive -- just the last three years.

      Here is a diary with links to maps.  I haven't checked these links, but there have been maps published showing exactly how Cheney and his fat-cat brethren had agreed to divvy up the Iraq oil fields.

      This was the prize all all along (and still is).  Cheney-Bush and the rest went hell-for-leather to steal the world's greatest treasure marked in the desert with a big black X.  Along the way they discovered the world's second largest unprotected treasure:  the US treasury which has been ransacked by Haliburton and scores of Republican operatives.

      The White House planned and executed a War of Aggression for profit.

      Period.

      Two war crimes make 'the right', not 'a right'. Defeat the liar John McCain.

      by Yellow Canary on Tue Oct 17, 2006 at 08:55:15 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I searched recent diaries (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        trashablanca

        To make sure this particular story was not already diaried.  I guess I need to work more on the using the search feature, dkos is an excellent resource with that historical information.

        Thanks for the linked diary, I'll check it out.

        •  I'm not picking on you or your diary. (2+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          MD patriot, trashablanca

          There is a very worthwhile constant turning of the fertile soil that makes dKos such a rich and useful community.

          This is, imho, the most important story of our time.  We are witnesses and bit players (if that) in what is shaping up to be the greatest crime in my lifetime (limiting it to things that I have some possible say in, if only as a voter).

          I do recommend using dKos search all the time.  As I said, the soil that is laid down here is rich.  And do post what you are passionate about.  Everybody comes along at different times and brings different things to the discussion.  This particular thing still hasn't gotten enough exposure.

          Two war crimes make 'the right', not 'a right'. Defeat the liar John McCain.

          by Yellow Canary on Tue Oct 17, 2006 at 09:15:34 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Thanks, I agree with you (2+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            Yellow Canary

            And I will spend even more time on dkos once I use the search engine more effectively.  Way too much time here, but I like the constant interplay of ideas with other people who think and analyze events rather than just sit back and watch.

  •  Hence all the lying ballyhoo (4+ / 0-)

    about Iraq's alleged sovererignty, despite Bush's inability to define the word.

    No one in the rest of the world is fooled.

    What's so hard about Peace, Love, and Truth and Progress?

    by melvin on Tue Oct 17, 2006 at 08:49:01 AM PDT

    •  Melvin ... (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      MD patriot

      ... give me a reality-test here (I trust you):  I didn't think anyone who was following Bush's criminality was in any doubt about the oil being the motive behind the crime of aggressive war.  Are they?

      I'm not trying to be rude to the diarist -- welcome to the club! -- but isn't this an old and accepted conclusion?  (That the invasion and occupation has always had as its goal US/Corporate control of Iraq oil fields?)

      This is the OIL ADMINISTRATION.  Bush, Cheney, and now Rice are all OIL MEN.

      Personally, I think this is the main reasons Cheney nominated himself to the Vice Presidency:  to steal the virgin desert for himself and his corporate overlords and brethren.  He knew Little-Dick (Bush) would go for it in a heartbeat, with only one question:  Can we get away with it?  He brought it up with Rummie who had his own reasons for signing on, and the rest is, with ineffable sadness, now our history.

      Two war crimes make 'the right', not 'a right'. Defeat the liar John McCain.

      by Yellow Canary on Tue Oct 17, 2006 at 09:06:34 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  The REAL reason we're there (10+ / 0-)

    to establish the independent state of Exxonistan

    •  And the lying is very transparent (3+ / 0-)

      All the twisted logic about "democracy in the Mideast" and "Iraqi Sovereignity" is exposed as a completely false story.  It's all about the oil and it has been since day one.  The WMD story line was easy to sell to a fearful US public after the 9/11 attacks.  Bushco jumped on the chance to mislead into war, and now we all suffer the consequences while the Bush chums get ready to lock in mult billions in profits.

      •  Which is why (4+ / 0-)

        Our Democratic administrations must rapidly move us off oil and onto renewables.  For two reasons: #1, to prevent us from being so rudely fucked in the future, and #2, to hang a bad investment around the necks of these bastards.  Which will also serve as a lesson to them regarding #1.

        "There he goes again! Who's laughing now, betch?" -- Jimmy Carter

        by slippytoad on Tue Oct 17, 2006 at 08:54:37 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Start with conservation on Nov. 8th (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          trashablanca

          If we can get the congress that would be a huge step, then immediately repudiate the loathsome Cheney who scoffed at conservation.  Conservation is the "low hanging fruit" that is easy to grab and allows some breathing room while working on future plans.

          In ten years I hope that my 50 mpg Prius is outdated, the next generation is said to be 90 mpg and after three years with that car I can say that we sacrifice nothing but a few thousand dollars for the hybrid drive, otherwise it is just like any regular car, just better mileage.

  •  I read this earlier today and thought Wow! (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    MD patriot, trashablanca

    This two-part article from alternet is Must Read material. After I finished it, I thought that a windfall profits tax is nothing but a slap on the wrist to the oil companies.

    "It does not require many words to speak the truth." -- Chief Joseph, native American leader (1840-1904)

    by highfive on Tue Oct 17, 2006 at 08:54:07 AM PDT

  •  maybe the Cheney energy task force (5+ / 0-)

    should be investigated by a new Congress?

    •  Henry Waxman as Chairperson (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      trashablanca

      I'm not sure if his committee would have jurisdiction, but that would be a good place to start, at the root of Bush/Cheney's reckless, criminal invasion of Iraq.

    •  maybe?? (4+ / 0-)

      This is the lynchpin of the entire criminal conspiracy.
      The day Littlegeorge hitched his wagon to this Machiavellian monstrosity is the day we became committed to being an oil empire.
      Why was energy policy such a high priority for BushCo CheneyCo immediately after stealing Florida? Gas was cheap, SUV sales were hot, and global warming was tinfoil fodder.
      But NRG trumped terra, taxes, everything.
      This is the key to ousting Cheney, and hopefully the conflict-of-interest Scalia, too.
      Maybe?

      On Liberation Day, 1/20/09, Americans will greet us with flowers and candy

      by kamarvt on Tue Oct 17, 2006 at 09:09:28 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Scalia, Cheney, Bush: trio of crooks (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Yellow Canary

        That's my belief, these guys are total criminals.  But it will be hard work to try and convict them since they are so connected to the bi-partisan power block.  Look at Traitor Joe and several other dems who were so quick to attack Clinton over his affair, yet never attack the loathsome Cheney and Bush for their criminal, deadly behavior that has caused hundreds of thousands of deaths and 100's of billions of dollars to be spent on destruction.

  •  Surely this has been brought up (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    trashablanca

    mny times, but I've always felt the allure of having a proxy vote in OPEC played a part.

    What's so hard about Peace, Love, and Truth and Progress?

    by melvin on Tue Oct 17, 2006 at 09:02:50 AM PDT

    •  Cheney the Iraq Oil Decider (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      trashablanca

      Yes, I wonder though whose interests would be voted in that case?  I certainly don't think that oil man Cheney wants lower oil prices.  He has profited handsomely from high oil prices while we all suffer.  Just imagine Cheney casting the vote to restrict Saudi Arabia output so that his cronies with Iraq's oil can increase their profits even more.

      Pump it out for $1/barrel, then sell for $60/Barrel, that yields some huge profits on the 112 Billion proven reserves in Iraq!

  •  Reminds me of the Godfather scene (4+ / 0-)

    Where the mob was cutting up a cake shaped like Cuba in greedy anticipation of a puppet government sellout.
    Maybe Cheney should have paid more attention to what happened next.

    In a democracy, the most important office is the office of citizen.- Louis Brandeis

    by crystal eyes on Tue Oct 17, 2006 at 09:13:34 AM PDT

    •  Cheney "creates his own reality" (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      trashablanca, crystal eyes

      So of course he figured that he could violate all the laws of war and occupation and everything would work out just fine!  Imagine Cheney and Rummy chuckling together as they planned how to divide up Iraq and accept those flowers and accolades from the grateful Iraqis!  What utterly evil idiots those two are, totally self-obsessed to the point of being ignorant of the real world, so powerful that they truly believe they can make something real just by saying it is so.

      Wake up Cheney, you are totally wrong and the best thing you could do would be to crawl into an "undisclosed location" and stay there for two years.

  •  Then why no post-war planning? (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Hornito, trashablanca

    This explains a lot and neatly ties together a number of threads (super-secret energy task force, why invade in the first place?, stay the course, ...).

    But there is one big problem with this theory: If Cheney is so intent on doing whatever it takes to steal Iraqi oil, then what about Rumsfeld's intent to go in and get out fast? Talk about post-war planning would have made the invasion hard to "sell" to voters. But if the oil stakes are so high, then don't you think the post-war planning would have been more serious? If, in fact, knocking off Saddam was just the cover for the oil grab, then post-war planning should have been the focal point of the planning effort.

    •  Hence the permanent military bases in Iraq (0+ / 0-)

      Rummy didn't care to secure the country [cakewalk], but there was planning to secure the oil fields.  The neotards just didn't get how important securing the country was in respect to securing the oil fields.

      "Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans." John Lennon

      by trashablanca on Tue Oct 17, 2006 at 09:44:17 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Grabbed for Oil ! (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    trashablanca

    A timely article on this topic:

    http://www.atimes.com/...

    The United States prefers to strive for advantage in the Great Game while hiding behind the veil of the ostensibly noble policy of spreading "freedom" and "democracy" - yet it is active in such a policy primarily only in countries that are either rich in strategic resources or are strategically located as respects the export of such resources. By military invasion and occupation, by encirclement through proliferation of its military bases, by the spread of "colored" revolutions, by sponsoring oil and gas pipelines that circumvent Russia and its partners, and by various diplomatic drives, the West attempts to roll back Russian control over resources and to consolidate its own.

    If you locate #4 in the series please link it.

    •  nice article, here's Part 4 from the Asia Times (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      FakeNews

      http://www.atimes.com/...

      When Putin promises to "play nice" with energy and other strategic resources, it must be understood that his idea of "playing nice" isn't remotely the same as what is hoped for in the West, which has been able until now to have its cake and eat it too, almost always giving suppliers the short shrift. Those days are already over. There is emerging a new global reality as respects energy security, and the West will have to forfeit a significant measure of its economic and political independence and autonomy in return for what Russia, not the West, defines as "energy security". The West is already forfeiting along those lines.
      Are global energy developments moving in that direction merely "by chance occurrence" as Putin insists, or have Russia and China been working for a decade or more to "cook up" such developments, and what are the implications?

  •  Oil is/was only one part.... (0+ / 0-)

    and perhaps number one, but let's not minimize the other aspects shall we?

    Second, was/is, Israel's strategic regional desires, which were promoted by the neocons behind the original war planning itself (Wolfowitz, Ledeen, Abrams, et al). One cannot understate the influence of Israel on this matter, nor that of their minions (AIPAC, et al) here, who unabashedly, and unceasingly, pushed for the invasion.

    Thirdly, was/is, the MIC (military-industrial complex). With billions (trillions?) in potential profits, one would be stupid to discount their influence as well. Their "think-tank plants" were all ringing the bells for war, and loudly.

    Reducing the motives to just oil, lets the others off the hook, and that is not a smart thing to do. We'll never be able to prevent a similar situation, unless we fully realize the facts, motives, and history behind this debacle.

    ..better that money be spent in the U.S. building windmills than squandered in the ME for Bush-McCain to tilt at them. -andydoubtless

    by Hornito on Tue Oct 17, 2006 at 10:22:27 AM PDT

    •  Bi-Partisan War Party (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Hornito

      You are right, and Norman Solomon's "War Made Easy" gives a good description of how the tame media groups help the Permanent War Party that controls the US beat the drums for war.

      Lots of profits for Halliburton and the Carlyle group lining Bush/Cheney's pockets.  

      That's one reason why I can not stand any thought of war-monger Hillary running for president in 2008.

      •  You make it sound like all the stars were aligned (0+ / 0-)

        for bad news in the mid east and its people and that it was going to happen come hell or high water. When you've got that much "positive reinforcement" going (moneywise) -  it's not hard or too tempting to make war... I guess.

Permalink | 43 comments