Very interesting bit over at The Guardian, wondering
whether or not advertising money is wated.
A telling bit is at the end, where he says: ""only" $2m behind this particular ad, it can achieve little more than its secondary objective: to introduce Kerry to the voters in the 17 "swing" states where both sides will be focusing æbetween now and November."
I'd like to think we could win without the ad blitz, but not today.