Skip to main content

Cross-posted from Free Exchange on Campus.

For those who think that the so-called "academic bill of rights" movement is a flash in the pan phenomenon that is going away as soon as David Horowitz tires of it, think again.  It would be more accurate to argue that the belief that government ought to get involved in what happens in a college classroom or in the lecture hall seems to be getting institutionalized as part of the right-wing agenda.  Too partisan you say?  Well, let's remember which party's college organization includes this effort as a part of its national agenda.  And do we really need to list the twenty-some odd state legislators who introduced ABOR legislation around the country and demonstrate their politics to make the point?

And the commitment continues.  Last week, two young politicians debated in Maine for a seat in the Maine House of Representatives.  According to The Maine Campus, Republican Lance Cowan argued for "loosening taxes and restrictions on local and small businesses in the state to help with economic troubles."  Apparently, however, he is looking to increase restrictions on higher education since he "also proposed to re-introduce an 'Academic Bill of Rights,' geared at making sure no students or university professors are discriminated against on the basis of political affiliation or beliefs."


How might such legislation open up a college or university classroom to better ideas?  According to Cowan, it "is in the best interests of students in Maine to be taught all sides of any given issue, including intelligent design theories."  Ah yes, the old "stop indoctrination by bringing religion into the classroom argument" - he definitely got the playbook.


And on the other side of the country, one student in Arizona keeps an eye on ABoR.

Following this weekend's fine op-ed in the Washington Post, we start this week with another great analysis of the so-called academic bill of rights by Matt Stone, senior at the University of Arizona.  Stone is rightly suspicious of a "policy" that purports to do something that is already addressed by campus polilcies and procedures -- the ole "solution in search of a problem" -- and is quick to assess the real intent.



   

    The entire proposal adds a third actor to the academic relations between student and professor: the government. If a student is unhappy with a course's content, he or she can go crying to the state Legislature. It all adds up to the defense of institutionalized ignorance: I don't like it, therefore I don't have to learn it.

   

    Of course, the bill of rights reeks of governmental paternalism, a trend that is increasingly (and regrettably) prevalent amongst the Republican ranks as social conservatives wield more influence. You can almost hear Barry Goldwater writhing in his grave.
   



Read the whole commentary at The Arizona Daily Wildcat.

Finally, here is Princeton University senior Asheesh Kapur Siddique's (above-mentioned) excellent commentary in Saturday's Washington Post where he outlines just why students should oppose the so-called academic bill of rights.  I offer one correction to Siddique's piece "Thought Police in the Lecture Hall."  He suggests that Temple University became the first university to adopt ABOR as a policy.  This, as we have pointed out before, is just not the case (well, except in the minds of rationale folks like Pennsylvania "soon-to-not-be-a" Representative Gib Armstrong). Overall, this is a really fine commentary.  Make sure you share it with your friends!


Update:  Siddique has a follow-up post over on the Campus Progress blog that is definitely worth reading as well.

Originally posted to Free Exchange on Campus on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 01:54 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thanks for posting about this. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    paul2port, fiddlingnero

    This "Academic Bill of Rights" stuff is really dangerous and it needs more attention. Of course, I don't have attention to give it until 11/8....but it's still important :-)

  •  Some ways to fight this nonsense: (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    nupstateny, A Mad Mad World
    • Insist that these rules apply to Corporations as well as Universities.  We will also create a Federal Office Of Whining And Moaning that will be empowered to review all promotions at Universities and Corporations to make sure that now one's feelings got hurt.  The Office will have subpoena powers.
    • Rename ABORs "Speech Codes".
    • Insist that since students pay tuition, that this "problem" should be left up to the Free Market.  If you don't like the classes, drop out.   What conservative can argue against the Wisdom of the Market?
    • Roll with it...but make sure that the first target is not History or Science, but Economics.  Point out that Econmics Departments are woefully short of Marxists...clear evidence of discrimination.  Business Schools should come under scrutiny as well.

    I know that this is a serious issue, but there is a lot of potential for fun and progress here.  Just like Liberals went (a little) too far with Affirmative Action and lost the center, this will be a good chance to show just how wacky and unhinged the Radical Right has become.

  •  Cowan can't win (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Craig Burnham

    OK, Cowan says he's going to introduce the Academic Bill of Rights into the ME Legislature.

    Well, he's got to win first.  

    And there's no way he will beat Emily Cain.

    His dumb campaign signs, saying "Academic Freedom Fighter" are not going to help him.

    So don't worry about it.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site