Skip to main content

Looking at the MSM's coverage of the attack on Mike Stark today, I've been struck by the lack of serious concern for Stark's rights.

"A fight kind of unfolded. . . . The Senator was rushed to the back.  He [Allen] is okay," local NBC reporter Henry Graff said as the tape of the assault on Stark played in the background.

Of course, the progressive blogosphere understands that Mike Stark was assaulted because he was trying to assert a very basic First Amendment right to question his government.  But from the initial NBC affiliate report, through the early print media accounts, the story seemed subtly spun as "Allen saved from rabid blogger."

I can live with that, I suppose.  I've come to expect it from almost all MSM news reporting.  But where I draw the line is when the police agencies designed to protect the citizenry seem to mimic the "attack the victim" mentality of the media.

Stark reported the assault to the appropriate authorities.  And this is their official response:

"We will find out who the people are, give him the information and he can go to the magistrate and try to obtain a warrant for them," Charlottesville Police Lt. Gary Pleasants told the Post.

Taken from the Raw Story account via the Washington Post.

Since when do police officers respond to assault victims by saying, "Yeah, we'll get the name of the guys who did it, and then you can try to prosecute this situation if you want."

Is that what they tell victims of Domestic Violence in Virginia?  Is it what they tell old women who are mugged?

There is evidence that a crime was committed.  An unwanted battery.  Perhaps there is a defense.  Perhaps Stark did something more than ask a question of his Senator to invoke the attack.  Perhaps the attackers had some legal authority to use force as they did.  But the evidence in the public record says that there is probable cause that a battery was committed.  A battery that may have been committed by the agents of a Senator.  A Senator with a history of insensitivity and apparent favor for questionable uses of force.  Such evidence ought to be met by the authorities with something more than, "Yeah, you handle it yourself."  There ought to be a full investigation.  Reports ought to be forwarded to a prosecutor.  And a charge should be authorized or not.  If the police and prosecuting officials are incapable of setting politics aside to conduct the necessary investigation, and to make the necessary determinations, then the case should be assigned to a non-interested agency with no such conflict.  But an important right is at stake.  And it shouldn't be laughed off by a half-assed investigation.

Fringe elements on the far right and the far left sometimes speculate about a politically fueled civil war.  Taking it to the streets.  Getting the guns out.  The failure to seriously investigate this battery encourages that reality.  Because if this incident ends with a "no harm, no foul" verdict, then the next time one of us is out exercising our legitimate rights to question our officials, and some wing-nut cadre decides they want to manhandle us, some of us are going to have to seriously think about defending ourselves.  Stark showed admirable restraint today.  But if assaults are the new norm, then reasonable defense is the new solution.

So we ought to encourage Virginia's finest to do their job.    If you are not too busy with your GOTV efforts, perhaps you'll give the Charlottesville Police Chief a call tomorrow.  He encourages us to call for quality of service issues.  (434) 970-3289.

Here's to Stark.  And a more perfect union.

Originally posted to BostonJoe on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 06:11 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site