Daily Kos

Not by draft alone, but by deed

Mon Nov 20, 2006 at 08:59:49 PM PDT

My spouse doesn't have a dKos account.  He did once, but sometime back before the switch to Scoop, he pissed off Kos enough with his anti-Dean rants (for Pres that is, we love him as DNC Chair) that Kos banned him.  He was okay with that, as he wasn't much of a blogger anyway.  

But then he started for fill in for me at Wampum when I ran for the Maine Leg in 2004, and the blogging bug bit pretty bad.  He's been writing over there ever since, often on military matters (as a Vietnam-era Navy vet, having grown up at the Naval Post Graduate School (where his mom taught until retiring recently.))  A few hours ago, he wrote something I thought deserved a much greater audience than our pre-Koufax-period pulls, so am using my daily diary to do just that.  It's rather short, but sweet.  His words, below the jump.

A year or so ago when I first heard Rep. Charles Rangel think out loud about reinstating the draft, I was opposed. Today I think its simply not enough. There are nearly a thousand flag rank officers in the armed forces. Few have gone on record as opposed to either overtly illegal orders, or overtly unsound policy, or overt looting. There are three service academies, between a quarter and a half of the enrollments are Congressional appointments who's primary qualification is membership in a cult, and which waste a quarter of all student classroom time on quasi-criminal hazing and criminal sexual abuse. There are 14 ballistic missile submarines, and several wings of B-52s, B-1s, and B-2s, and strategic missile forces consuming budget and not decrementing the former Soviet throw-weight, and "missile defense" is both corporate welfare and abandonment of the divisions of troops stationed in Korea.

Yes. Institute the Draft, but not simply to change the labor rules for the intake of the enlisted, but as part of a program to put an end to the Professional Military as an American institution. Close the service academies for a year, then re-open them, with entry by competitive examination from all the ROTC programs at the land-grant colleges. There is no reason why the best midshipmen at Berkeley can't transfer to Annapolis should they want to attend the service academy, they are schools for future officers, and nothing more than that. We need gays and lesbians in uniform, and we need women soldiers in combat arms. And we need early retirement for senior officers who are gung ho for every bad idea that happens to float their particular boat.

If we're going to fix it, let's fix it.

Tags: draft, Charles Rangel (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 4 comments

  •  Rangel's (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    GreyHawk

    move meant some pretty hot under the collar conversation at my coffee shop today.

    Draft is not a popular word on the Berkeley/Oakland border.

  •  Institute a draft ONLY if ... (0+ / 0-)

    ...it includes women and men, gay and straight, rich and poor, with exemptions only for violent criminals in the slammer, those incarcerated in mental institutions, the physically disabled, and those willing to do alternative service because they don't believe in killing.

    Such a draft has zero chance of being implemented.

    Which is why I support it.

    I am an anti-imperialist. I am opposed to having the eagle put its talons on any other land. -- Mark Twain

    by Meteor Blades on Tue Nov 21, 2006 at 01:16:18 AM PDT

  •  Thanks for sharing this. (0+ / 0-)

    Jeff Huber had this   to say:

    I was in the audience of my war college's auditorium when a four-star officer advised us that the secret to success in a military career was knowing how to size up your boss.  "Figure out what the bastard wants and give it to him," the four-star said.  That may well have been the very moment I decided that my days in uniform were numbered.  

    In subsequent years, I came to realize just how prevalent the top-down group-think was in military circles, and how exhortations to practice "original thinking" were really admonitions to think in ways that supported ideas and theories that originally came from on high.  Nobody at the top of the chain of command really wants you to "think outside the box" unless the box you're thinking outside of is somebody else's and not theirs.

  •  Sockpuppet! (0+ / 0-)

    ;)

Permalink | 4 comments