Skip to main content

This is in response to the recent diary Why I don't do charity. It started as a comment, but it started getting a little bit out of hand lengthwise, so bear with me.

My starting position is this: I see where the author is coming from, and agree with him to an extent on the macro level. I’m certainly in no position to call him a scrooge. However, when applied to the real world, I think his philosophy starts to break down. The good, the bad, and the ugly of charity and the government on the flip.

First, where he’s right

Private charity is, in a systemic sense, much less effective than government policy. - A charity is set up to deal with a problem. Hunger, healthcare for the poor, AIDS education, what have you. Generally, however, they don’t have the perspective to see how all the pieces fit together. A food bank is in no position to help reduce the number of people who can’t afford their own food. A free clinic isn’t thinking about reducing the mercury emissions of the factory ten miles down the road. The government is in a better position to see the big picture and take action at a much higher level – to use a clichéd medical analogy, they’re in a better position to treat root diseases where private charity can only assuage the symptoms.

If the private sector is doing something – even if badly – the government is loath to enter the field, except to subsidize the existing players. Think health insurance. The system is broken. Everyone knows it’s broken. The government could do it for less. But no, that can’t be right! Everyone knows the private sector can do it for less! (using “it” in the Ebay sense: whatever “it” is we’re talking about.) And so the plans on the table are mostly about how to funnel more money to the existing private players in hopes they’ll let some of it trickle down. And even if something used to be public, once it goes private, it tends to stay that way. Think about how many road and rail privatizations you hear about versus how many public buyouts. And even when things do go the other way, it’s a hard fought battle: “Government pensions for the elderly! Madness! That’s the responsibility of families/churches/friends/etc.!”

But then, what I think he’s missing

Government – especially the large-scale government of the type that can really take large-scale problems – is inefficient. - There, I said it. Call me Grover Norquist. But seriously, this isn’t a fault of Government, per se, it’s a fault of large organizations. The bigger you get, the larger management structure you get, the longer it takes for the required paperwork to get from the guy who sees the problem to the guy who can do something about the problem, the more of a Herculean effort it is to get anything done at all. The Government response to Hurricane Katrina was a travesty. It could have been done a lot better. But the best-run government in the world could not have gotten aid there faster than the locals could aid each other.

Government cannot possibly make everyone happy all the time. - Make up your ideal government, populate it with your favorite leaders, and I guarantee it will grossly underemphasize some issue or program you consider to be of key importance. It’s just not going to agree with you on everything. Extrapolate this out to a real government, and you can see where I’m going. The government does not have the time or capital to give everyone a pony. Can it do a lot more than it’s doing now? Of course. But its desires have to be weighed against competing expenditures, financial prudence, and the willingness of the people to pay taxes. At some point, for reasons valid or otherwise, it’s going to say “no”, and lobby all you want, you’re not going to get your way.  

which brings us to

Sometimes the choice isn’t "government versus private", it’s "something versus nothing". - You see a hungry guy. He wants a sandwich. The two options we seem to be debating, outside of kicking him and telling him to get a job, are

  1. Give him a sandwich
  2. Lobby the government for improved poverty assistance

Now, there are perfectly valid arguments for why you should or should not do either of these. But the thing to remember is that while you’re doing your lobbying, even if it’s completely successful in the end, the guy’s still got no sandwich. It may be that private charity is just a band-aid, but if the guy’s bleeding all over the place, a band-aid might be just what he needs while you call an ambulance.

Unlike the original author, I don’t have a coherent philosophy on giving. And I guess that’s the point. You give because you see something that needs to be done, no one’s doing it, and you can. That’s it. As Democrats, we work to make the nation a better place from the top down. As human beings, we do what we can from the bottom up.

Originally posted to ripzaw on Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 11:47 AM PST.

Tags

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site