Skip to main content

This is kind of a horrifying little story out of the BBC today.  Pakistan, whose border with Afghanistan is quite porous, is planning on mining it.  They shouldn't give the Minutemen any ideas.

Pakistan plans to fence and plant landmines along sections of its border with Afghanistan to stop militants, a foreign office official has said.

Speaking at a press conference, Foreign Secretary Riaz Mohammad Khan said the move would stop "militant activity from Pakistan inside Afghanistan".

Afghanistan rejected the plan saying both countries need to tackle "terrorists in a real manner".

How this could possibly end in anything but tragedy is unthinkable.

There are tribal populations in this region who routinely cross the border to the extent that they probably don't even know where it is.  It is glaringly obvious that the only result of this action will be hundreds of villagers getting their legs blown off while herding their goats.

You have to ask yourself why Pakistan would be mining the border.  Supposedly Taliban fighters seeking refuge in Pakistan who cross into Afghanistan is the source of the problem.  And yet Afghanistan hasn't resorted to these steps.  The Foreign Secretary may claim the move would stop militant activity, but I think the real objective is to keep refugees out.  The Taliban has essentially signed a peace treaty with Pakistan, and the idea that they would then wall them out of Afghanistan just doesn't make any sense.  But in the event that the mullahs do return to power in Afghanistan, presumably there would be a stream of desperate Afghans trying to get over the mountains.  This mining the border would seem to serve the Taliban's needs far more than the reverse.

Pakistan is one of only 40 countries that haven't signed the Global Ban on Landmines (including the United States!)  Afghanistan is a signatory.  This is a militaristic, impractical and completely dangerous provocation on the part of the Pakistani government.  These are the consequences, completely out of proportion, to planting landmines over hundreds of miles in the name of giving Afghanistan "help" which they do not want.


Antipersonnel mines cannot be aimed: they do not distinguish between the footfall of a soldier or a child.
They lie dormant until a person or animal triggers their detonating mechanism.
Then, landmines kill or injure civilians, soldiers, peacekeepers and aid workers alike.


When triggered, a landmine unleashes unspeakable destruction.
A landmine blast causes injuries like blindness, burns, destroyed limbs and shrapnel wounds.
Sometimes the victim dies from the blast, due to loss of blood or because they don’t get to medical care in time.
Those who survive and receive medical treatment often require amputations, long hospital stays and extensive rehabilitation.
The injuries are no accident, since landmines are designed to maim rather than kill their victims.

Stolen lives, limbs and livelihoods

Mine deaths and injuries over the past decades now total in the hundreds of thousands.
It is estimated that there are between 15,000 and 20,000 new casualties caused by landmines and unexploded ordnance each year. That means there are some 1,500 new casualties each month, more than 40 new casualties a day, at least two new casualties per hour.
Most of the casualties are civilians and most live in countries that are now at peace.

The impact of this will be felt for decades.  Afghanistan already has as many unexploded landmines as any country on the globe.  This has been devastating to their reconstruction and development efforts.  To place more of them on the perimeter is unconscionable.  Pakistan is known to be resistant to providing full information about the existence or whereabouts of unexploded landmines.  These deadly instruments will be lost, only to be found by accident, and by a civilian.

Pakistan is supposed to be our ally in the war on terror (I know, I just laughed writing that), but this is the worst possible solution that could be put to the problem of terrorism.

Originally posted to dday on Tue Dec 26, 2006 at 07:05 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  tips (14+ / 0-)

    There should be outrage among the international community at this prospect.  Landmines are medieval in their cruelty.

    D-Day, the newest blog on the internet (at the moment of its launch)

    by dday on Tue Dec 26, 2006 at 07:03:46 PM PST

  •  wonderful planet. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Anna M, Sanuk, Janet G

    maybe change the diary's title.  Freepers might get ideas about immigration policy.

    We don't have time for short-term thinking.

    by Compound F on Tue Dec 26, 2006 at 07:34:35 PM PST

  •  This is why I love the BBC... (0+ / 0-)

    Some real news... don't hold your breath expecting to see this on CNN [or, God forbid, Fox]...

  •  Which fine retail establishment (0+ / 0-)

    is profiting from this sale? How many guesses?

    Oh that we had the gift to see ourselves as others see us. Robbie Burns

    by ohcanada on Tue Dec 26, 2006 at 08:46:42 PM PST

  •  You mean that Pakistan is doing ANYTHING (0+ / 0-)

    to fight "terrorism"?!?!

    Sounds like words and no more.... the Pakistanis have signed a defact truce and ceded control of border areas to LOCAL chiefs.

    I doubt that anything will really happen - or more likely - that any land mines actually deployed will be used to defend positions FROM US troops

    •  The people in the tribal areas (0+ / 0-)

      were there before Pakistan had a government. Wajiristan, Baluchistan, they never recognised the johnny come lately government of Pakistan. There is oil in the area and the people are paying a price, well the children will be for sure, landmines do that.

      Oh that we had the gift to see ourselves as others see us. Robbie Burns

      by ohcanada on Wed Dec 27, 2006 at 12:03:31 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  I find it hard to believe... (0+ / 0-)

    that this isn't getting more play - either at dKos or in the media.  Ho hum, more land mines, more blown up civilians and legless children... lah te dah.

    Doesn't anyone see this as barbaric?  Sheesh!

    I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! -Barry Goldwater

    by Red no more on Tue Dec 26, 2006 at 09:45:21 PM PST

  •  Alternatives? (0+ / 0-)

    Is there any other way to secure the border (ie, prevent the jihadis in Pakistan from supplying arms and fighters to Afghanistan, and prevent the opium gangs from sending drugs to Pakistan), that doesn't involve stationing hundreds of thousands of soldiers in sparsely spread-out, desolate mountainous regions, where housing and feeding them would be a monumental task?

    Maybe I'm naive in supposing that the mined areas of the border would be clearly marked (that's a big part of their deterrent effect, I believe).

    •  they're also putting paramilitaries out there (0+ / 0-)

      If this was a joint effort, I'd be more inclined to give it the benefit of the doubt.  That Pakistan's going it alone suggests to me that this is preparation for a possible humanitarian crisis ahead.

      D-Day, the newest blog on the internet (at the moment of its launch)

      by dday on Tue Dec 26, 2006 at 10:52:33 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Under the Muzzle of a Rifle (0+ / 0-)

    This is very tragic, but it's hardly surprising.

    The U.S. and other foreign powers are constantly putting pressure on Pakistan and its northern security effectiveness - this is probably the result (along with the refugee problem).

    Tragic indeed.

    "Don't talk to me about atrocities; all war is an atrocity." - Lord Kitchener

    by otheruser on Tue Dec 26, 2006 at 10:53:41 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site