Daily Kos

Canadian Media Prepares to Hand Harper His Balls on a Platter

Sun Feb 12, 2006 at 06:16:09 PM PDT

Traditionally in Canada, new governments are granted what is called a "honeymoon," as Canadians and the media give the cabinet-in-training some time and leeway to get themselves acquainted with their new portfolios and implement their promised platforms.

Stephen Harper's honeymoon ended the same day his government was sworn in last week, with the announcement that he had appointed an unelected Conservative organizer bagman to the unelected Canadian Senate, so that he could serve as Minister of Public Works Pork; and that the former Liberal cabinet minister, David Emerson, had switched parties to serve as Tory International Trade Minister.

The shit hasn't stopped hitting the fan since, as the Canadian media and the public begin to squeeze the new government on three fronts:  Its pledge to abandon the old politics of patronage and cronyism, to be a more moderate, mainstream party than its Alliance/Reform progenitor, and to provide continued support for Canada's important social programmes.

Canadians elected Harper et al. with their fingers crossed, prepared to be vigilant that the party they rejected as corrupt in 1993 and as wingnutty in 2004 doesn't go back to its corrupt slash Socon ways.

The Canadian media is not like the American media.  Come to think of it, no western industrialized country has a media quite as obsequious and incurious as the US o' A.  This week they began cranking out the stories to remind us that, yes, this new Tory government could perhaps be just as corrupt and wingnutty as Canadians feared.

Emerson and Fortier
As  Vancouver radio host Bill Good so piquantely put it, "I still have newspapers in the recycling box declaring a Liberal win in Vancouver Kingsway.  Kingsway is traditionally a riding that has supported the social democratic New Democratic Party, and, in the last two elections, the Liberals.  It has not elected a Conservative candidate since 1958, and the party came in third with 18% of the vote in the most recent election.  The constituents of David Emerson are not happy that Emerson crossed the floor.  Since the swearing in last Monday, the Emerson imbroglio has only grown, with a rally of 400 last night in his riding demanding he resign to run in a by-election.  Another rally is planned tomorrow.

The furor has now infiltrated the ranks of Harper's backbenchers who will no doubt be a mouthier bunch than the Liberal caucus (expect the wingnuts to start baying about abortion and gay marriage, much to the cringing of Harper and his coterie).  Even the Calgary Sun's headline "Emerson Called a Traitor," reflects the furor in solid-blue Alberta, where democratic reform - especially of the Senate - and patronage are huge thorns in the side of voters.  The Conservative faithful are at best confused, but mostly infuriated by Harper's betrayal of their principles.

Indeed, it is Harper's appointment of Michel Fortier to the Senate that has caused at least as big a furor in Alberta, where Harper's old party - The Canadian Alliance - had campaigned for an "elected, effective, and equal" Senate since its inception.  Harper's election pledge to appoint only people who had been elected in their provinces to the Senate has been seen to be, well, stretching the truth somewhat.  As Emerson has refused calls to run in a by-election for his new party, so Fortier has refused to seek a seat in the House or run for a Senate seat.

The Tories are desperately hopin that this story won't have legs.  The media is making sure it does.  It has been a news item every day since the swearing in.

CBC on the Attack

Oh yes, the CBC won't get fooled again!  There are still cars rolling around the streets with faded bumperstickers reading, "Protect the CBC!"  Everyone here remembers the budget cuts Brian Mulroney and his government inflicted on the crown corporation - Canada's national broadcaster for over 70 years.  Now, the "Mother Corp" is making pre-emptive strikes to make sure that any attempt to undercut the broadcaster by cutting budgets or appointing cronies (as Mulroney appointed one of his former cabinet ministers, Perrin Beatty, as chairman of the corporation), is seen to be pure vengeance.

Exhibit One:  The Return of Karlheinz Screiber.  Schreiber, former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, and former Conservative Newfoundland Premier Frank Moores, were targets of a 1995 RCMP investigation into unlawful commissions from the sale of Airbus planes to Air Canada, then a Crown corporation.  The investigation didn't go anywhere.

Now CBC's documentary programme, the fifth estate has completed its own investigation, in which Schreiber speaks of paying $300,000 to the former Prime Minister.  Dredging up Tory corruption at the beginning of the first Tory government since Mulroney and his successor, Kim Campbell, left office, is...well, a little coincidental.

Exhibit Two:  The Wingnuts Cometh.  This past week, a stunning documentary on CBC Newsworld's The Lens brought together an evangelical pastor and a gay couple.  Each travelled to one another's home cities of Calgary and Vacnouver, and the programme ended with the pastor being converted to the reality of marriage equality in Canada.  

Hard on the heels of this documentary, came the report that Focus on the Family Canada would be opening a so-called "think tank", called the Institute of Marriage and Family Canada in Ottawa to provide "information" to federal legislators on such things as abortion and marriage equality.  By law, special interest groups are not allowed to lobby or fund politicians or political parties, but you can bet that the CBC and other media have been playing this up as the first rank of Bushco's shock troops hitting the ground.

CBC Radio had a blistering report about this last week on The Current.  It began with sound bites of Stephen Harper ending speeches with "God bless Canada" - which, to a nation as secular as this one, is cringe-inducing for most Canadians.  It then interviewed members of Harper's Alliance Church in Calgary, asking what they'd like to see from the government of their fellow-congregant.  "I'd like to see Stephen finally do something about gay marriage," one after another intoned.  Cue the report on the new FoF front-organization in Ottawa, and the knife was firmly twisted in the kidneys of the young Tory government.

Looming on the Horizon

The Speech from the Throne has not yet been written, but already Harper's child care proposals threaten to imperil his minority government.  The provinces are lining up to pressure the feds to come through with a plan to provide subsidized child care in addition to the tax credits Harper promised during the election.  The NDP has jumped on board, issuing veiled threats to bring down the government if they don't write some sort of national programme into their budget.

Stay tuned kiddies, and break out the "beer and popcorn" - the next few months are gonna be fun!

Poll

Harper's government is...

6%9 votes
54%81 votes
40%60 votes

| 150 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: Canada, Stephen Harper, David Emerson, Focus on the Family, Karlheinz Schreiber, Brian Mulroney, children, social policy, media, journalism, CBC, Conservative Party (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 37 comments

  •  Tip jar (4.00 / 30)

    Cuz you just can't get enough of Canadian politics....admit it!!!!!

    "The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation." - Pierre Trudeau

    by fishhead on Sun Feb 12, 2006 at 06:16:25 PM PDT

    •  Because it's fun... (none / 0)


      Your right one can never have enough politics. It's what I use to take my mind off school.... :)

      Great post too. Very enjoyable.

    •  Can you say "Joe Clark"? (4.00 / 2)

      I knew you could.

      John McCain will end Roe v. Wade if he's president.

      by Phoenix Woman on Sun Feb 12, 2006 at 06:58:19 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Poor ol' Joe (none / 0)

        I'll admit, guiltily, that even though I'm a tried and true social liberal who has always voted NDP (or  LPC, when the tactical need arose), I've always had a soft spot for Joe.

        I recall the 2000 election, where Stockwell Day of the reform party was agitating to bring any public policy matter to a referendum if 3% of the Canadian population petitioned on it. During the debate, Day and Chretien were arguing about whether or not Canadians cared about some arcane point of political nonsense, getting louder and louder with no moderator control in sight, when in the background I heard "Why don't you just take a referendum on it, Stock? Ho ho ho ho ho..."

        I damn near peed myself I was laughing so hard.

        Don't get me wrong. I'm not a Joe Clark fanboy... he's far more conservative than I on issues both fiscal and social. I do think he's a genuinely decent guy (albeit one with a philosophy I disagree with at many points) who just came along at the wrong point in time... his 8 or so months in power notwithstanding.

        Hell, a guy who floated ideas like pot decriminalization and minimum guaranteed incomes couldn't have been all bad. ;)

        --
        Plot your political compass scores at KosCompass

        by Hatamoto on Sun Feb 12, 2006 at 09:55:56 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  Well, actually (4.00 / 2)

      it's your media that we couldn't possibly get enough of!

      My fantasy is that you guys would be generous enough to fund a Radio Free USA so that we'd have a source for real news right here in Georgelandia.

      Of course, like other totalitarian regimes, Bush & His Loyal Courtiers would try to jam it, but still it would be worth a try. We all have nothing to lose ... but our rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

    •  Loved the post very much (none / 1)

      I gather that Canada is, what?, a protectorate, a country, or something, near my own US, right? Got any oil?

      Until we break the corporate virtual monopoly on what we hear and see, we keep losing, don't matter what we do.

      by Jim P on Sun Feb 12, 2006 at 08:49:54 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Umm... (4.00 / 6)

    "Even the Calgary Sun's headline "Emerson Called a Traitor," reflects the furor in solid-blue Alberta, where democratic reform - especially of the Senate - and patronage are huge thorns in the side of voters."

    Sort of.  Albertans only care about democratic reform when it pertains to breaking the grip of Liberal power in Ottawa.  If Albertans and Albertan politicians REALLY cared about democratic reform, they'd have overthrown the Alberta PCs from the Legislature years ago.  They are the epitome of back-scratching, party-rewarding governance all under the aura of giving the "people" what they want.

    Swing State Project: A sexy, sassy look at the 2008 elections. Get a four-digit UID while you still can!

    by HellofaSandwich on Sun Feb 12, 2006 at 06:21:59 PM PDT

  •  The conservatives have a mandate. (4.00 / 5)

    They have political capital and a mandate, and they are going to spend it. What can they get for a dime?

    It is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners.

    by A Citizen on Sun Feb 12, 2006 at 06:29:40 PM PDT

  •  I think Harper will probably do just fine (none / 0)

    I say this as someone who worked his butt off for the Liberals in the last election.  The libertarian tories are furious with him for accepting Emerson's unseemly defection and nominating Fortier to represent Montreal, when Fortier didn't have the balls to present himself during the election, and Harper had a couple of half-way decent possible picks from those who did run in Montreal.  But he's a smart guy, and if he proceeds slowly and with due diligence, he will weather this storm.  His biggest threat isn't from the CBC or the Liberals or the Press: it's the right wing of his own party.
  •  Harper is clueless (4.00 / 7)

    A few years ago I visited Calgary at the time of the Stampede. To my great surprise the city was ripping Harper mercilessly. He made the mistake of thinking that he could skip holding a traditional pancake breakfast!

    Right in the heartland Stephen showed what he's got:
    No charisma.
    No good judgement about the common person and the need to press the flesh, shake a few babies,  and kiss a few hands.
    No good advice from his inner circle.
    No sense of history.

    Why don't these people just talk to Joe Clark? He's approachable. He could tell them what happens when you try to govern like a majority party with minority status. Joe could show some of those knife wounds inflicted by Mulroney. Think the Libs will just let you do as you please for about 18 months? Think again think tank boy.

    Why would a "principled man" use a senate appointment so cynically? No it won't be ok with your base to make the new senator resign later. No it is not ok to appoint an unelected crony to cabinet and think the old Reform group will look the other way.

    Hey Stephen beware the ides of March.

    •  Inclined to agree (4.00 / 4)

      I know upthread Knut claimed that Harper is a smart guy, and would probably regain his balance.  But I'm not so sure.  Harper is a little too clever by half and - as we all know - intelligence in some things doesn't translate into political savvy.  Chretien was not the brightest bulb in the socket - but he had political street smarts that allowed him to play a vital role in Canadian politics for a quarter centurey.

      And intelligence is not a virtue, either.

      I'm sick and tired of giving people like Harper the benefit of the doubt - essentially trying to assague my own doubts and fears and hope for the best.  I truly think that the Tories are going to stumble - both because of the wingnuts on their right (as Knut rightly pointed out) and because of the old Mulroneyites like Derek Birney (head of Harper's transition team), who will - unchecked - continue to pull dumb, alienating stunts a la Emerson and Fortier.

      "The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation." - Pierre Trudeau

      by fishhead on Sun Feb 12, 2006 at 07:30:42 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  What I don't get (none / 1)

        is how utterly inept the last week was.

        I mean I expected some brain dead nonsense out of some of the MPs, but the level of political incompetence it took to make the decisions he did...I mean, wow.  The Emerson fiasco has been one stupid thing after another.

  •  Nice diary! (none / 1)

    I enjoy your Canadian political posts here. As a fellow Canadian (Victoria, BC) I was wondering if you know of a blog like Daily Kos for Canadian politics?

    As to the meat of your blog, I think you're dead on when you say that Harper has already alienated part of his base with the appointment of Fortier and Emerson to his cabinet. Unlike many American conservatives, there are a fair number of intelligent conservatives who stand up for their beliefs and are willing to criticize their party. It's never a good sign to start your adminstration with a scandal.

  •  Always great reading you fishhead (none / 0)

    I'm doing some research over the next couple days about the GST and transit ridership.  The retooling that's going to have to happen across the country as the Tories plan to drop the GST a percentage is going to be a huge waste of small business time and money.  I'd say that they should keep it at 7% and use the 1-2% as funding for public transit across the country, pro rated to ridership rates.

    "now this is not the end, it is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." W. Churchill

    by Thor Heyerdahl on Sun Feb 12, 2006 at 07:22:06 PM PDT

    •  Suspicious of tightly targeted taxes (none / 1)

      They're pretty inflexible. As well, a transit tax would benefit cities much more than rural areas.

      I'd rather see the 2 percent turned over to cities and rural administrative districts (Canada doesn't really have counties the way the U.S. does), which have funding problems and could use the stable revenue provided by the GST.

      Je suis Marxiste, tendance Groucho.

      by gracchus on Sun Feb 12, 2006 at 07:55:20 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I agree with you that it benefits cities more (none / 0)

        However, many municipalities across Canada are using  much needed portions of their budgets for transit - that could be used for other social needs.

        I look at Toronto, who has the 3rd highest rate of transit use in N. America (after NYC and Mexico City).  The passenger pays more to the system than any other major system in Canada or the US.  And with gas costs rising, there are more and more people riding -> essentially costs to ride have effectively doubled, and service has been reduced see Rocket Riders report.

        The cities of Canada are the economic engine of the country - and an effective transit system is key to that.

        "now this is not the end, it is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." W. Churchill

        by Thor Heyerdahl on Sun Feb 12, 2006 at 08:52:46 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Harper (none / 1)

    I give Harper's minority govt six months. No wingnut govt can survive in a country with a free and fair media.

    The wingnuts have prospered in USA because they owned much of the media, especially TV and most people get their news from TV. They planned their takeover of the govt carefully. They started by radio stations, cable networks and now sadly the takeover is complete. US radio and TV networks are right wing echo chambers.

    Luckily for Canadians they still have a liberal media to expose the wingnuttery of a Tory regime.

    •  The Tories have wingnuts (4.00 / 3)

      but the party isn't owned by them the way the Republicans are owned by American winguts. In fact, a few of the bigger wingnuts lost their seats in the last election. Harper's success was in convincing voters in part of rural Quebec and in the "Tim Horton's belt" between Toronto and Windsor that he was centrist enough to vote for without blowing up the country. If he governs from the right, those voters will go liberal again. Political alignments are a tad more fluid in Canada than in the U.S.

      Je suis Marxiste, tendance Groucho.

      by gracchus on Sun Feb 12, 2006 at 07:43:31 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  "Save the CBC" (4.00 / 3)

    During the election campaign, Rick Mercer made a wisecrack at the end of the "Mercer Report" about the possibility of Harper auctioning off the CBC if the Tories won.

    Thanks, fishhead, for your insights into Canadian politics. I live 25 miles from the border and watch "The National" regularly, but I've got to learn about the subject (yeah, I'm a junkie).
     

    John McCain's Straight Talk Express runs on fossil fuels.

    by Dump Terry McAuliffe on Sun Feb 12, 2006 at 07:40:01 PM PDT

  •  If the Liberals and NDP (none / 0)

    were smart, they would form a coalition in opposition. They're going to be the new government very soon anyway.
    •  No tradition of coalition government in Canada (4.00 / 2)

      and no need for a coalition while in opposition. The last time the NDP by itself kept a Liberal government in power (1972-75 if memory serves) it wasn't a formal coalition (no NDP ministers in government, no caucusing together), and it resulted in the NDP loosing half its caucus in the following election, effectively ending the political career of David Lewis, the party leader and one of its founders. The NDP, unsurprisingly, has been wary of coaltions, formal or informal.

      Je suis Marxiste, tendance Groucho.

      by gracchus on Sun Feb 12, 2006 at 07:48:35 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Ontario 1985-7 (none / 1)

        There was, however, a Liberal-NDP alliance government in Ontario 1985-87. The Liberals had a few seats fewer than the Tories, although with a popular vote plurality. They signed a pact with the NDP in which they spelled out their agenda, entirely in line with the NDP programme, and the NDP agreed to support them in government for two years. After that, the Liberals called a new election and won a majority.

        That kind of arrangement is unusual in Canada, however.

        The kind of coalition that would make the most difference would be at election time -- both parties could refrain from running candidates in certain ridings, endorsing the other. That's a common arrangement in some other first-past-the-post parliamentary systems (India, Malaysia), but I don't think it's ever been tried in Canada, and can't see either party agreeing to it.

        What might be a good idea is for a group of NDP and Liberal supporters outside their respective party organizations got together in a strategic voting alliance, endorsing candidates according to electability and urging strategic voting. IIRC there was such an alliance in Ontario in 2000, when the Harris Tories were running for reelection.

        •  I should have specified federal politics (none / 1)

          In B.C. the Liberals and the Tories had an informal agreement to alternate in order to keep the NDP out of provincial government. Then they introduce a form of preferential ballot in the 1950s to make that system more secure and ended up with Social Credit (rightwing populist statists, very petit bourgeois) coming up the middle for about three decades of government. The SoCreds later became a defacto Lib-Con alliance.

          The Ontario arrangement was very unusual, perhaps unique in Canadian history. Different than a conventional coalition with a mixed cabinet, too.  

          Je suis Marxiste, tendance Groucho.

          by gracchus on Sun Feb 12, 2006 at 08:20:14 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  Goddam (none / 0)


    This intellectual east coast-west coast liberal media establishment of ours, these nattering nabobs of negativism. We'll never catch up with the USA this way.

    the blue sea seethes with reason

    by howth of murph on Sun Feb 12, 2006 at 08:40:50 PM PDT

  •  Ah, The Current! I listen every morning via on (none / 1)

    shortwave radio down here in NM.   Everyone should pick up a cheap shortwave (Walgreens has them for $15 the last couple of weeks); Radio Canada Intl. broadcasts several times a day to NA, and the Current is on in the AM.  RECOMMENDED!!!!
  •  hmm, what a bunch of goofy goopers! (none / 0)

    off with their head! sorry i couldn't resist that!

Permalink | 37 comments