This diary is about etiquette, civil discourse, the criteria of a Lincoln-Douglas debate, and the process of objectively considering facts and determining their context.
I understand the knee jerk reaction to the absurd conspiratorial view. In a world of facts and figures we don't need wild speculation or baseless conjecture. There is enough legitimate evidence to prove there are several major problems in the world today that need to be solved. There is no need to embellish, invent, fabricate, or otherwise deceive anyone as our cause is rational and practical.
All you need is the truth, which can easily be found in legitimate direct sources.
I want to know the truth and if I'm misunderstanding something I want to be corrected. I want facts supported by more facts, so I know what I am reading is the
real truth. I'd hope this desire to know what is real and what isn't would be universally shared by all Kossacks.
The whole purpose of
United Elite is to document legitimate direct sources so our readers can discover the real truth. You can debate the context of the information but you can't ignore the fact that these are the words of the actual individuals and organizations we are analyzing. Obviously we do not agree with everything on our site; we only endorse the 5 keys to
Practical Globalization.
There are 14 links on the main page. The first one goes to the
Single Global Currency Association (SGCA), which is a respected organization that promotes the goal of Bretton Woods 2024 for a single global currency. If your resume exceeds that of the former FED Chairman Paul Volcker's or the 'father of the Euro' Robert Mundell's then feel free to try to discredit this organization. Of course, it is the same organization that set up the 1944 Bretton Woods System creating the IMF & World Bank and subsequently suspending the dollar's convertibility into gold in 1971, creating the $2 trillion per day foreign exchange Interbank market of today. Thus they will most certainly succeed in 2024.
The next link is to Colonel Edward House. All the information listed is from
Yale University Library,
Colonel House's actual diaries (i.e. his own words),
the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) website,
legitimate books on the subject, and Colonel House's own book
Philip Dru: Administrator. Yet somehow people think I made it all up and it's fiction. I am not slanting it in a suspicious light either.
It is what it is.
People argue that House is not important, yet I offer his
photo on the cover of TIME magazine,
his photo with President Wilson on the CFR's history page, and a quote from
Wilson saying his alter-ego is House. Furthermore, the
CFR's Max Boot explicitly states that Bush and the neoconservatives' foreign policy is congruent to hard-Wilsonianism, created by House and written about in his book Philip Dru. Please, if I am incorrect about any of this prove me wrong so I know what is right.
The next article is about
Practical Globalization, which I wrote. My first references are
GHWB's Presidential Library,
a speech by GHWB, concepts of a Republic (supported by
Black's Law Dictionary), sources such as
the Fabian Society, HG Wells, Carroll Quigley, the FBI, Bob Jones University,
a former Congressional investigator, an attorney to the Congressional investigation, a speech by President Clinton, a speech by a Senator,
a CIA declassified document on Bin Laden's Caliphate, and some neoconservative quotes from their own publicist's website;
Benador Associates.
You can't erase Carroll Quigley's brilliant scholarship merely because some extreme right wing conspiratorial individual uses Quigley's 1300-page book of historical fact to support his conjecture. Quigley's work has never been discounted. I am not suggesting anything more than what Quigley wrote and am simply pointing out consistencies with the historical record (e.g. such as supporting Dodd's account and referencing Wormser's book). People everyday (e.g. terrorists) exploit religious texts for their own nefarious purposes yet that doesn't mean God is any less real.
You can argue that I have weaved an elaborate connection between unrelated events, although I'm not implying any intimate connection. Consider them individually even though many of them reference each other. This latter observation only increases the validity of the sources as their facts are supported in multiple ways. How can you disprove or argue against that?
The next article is from
Presidential Studies Quarterly in the George Herbert Walker Bush Presidential Library. No objection there surely, moving along...
The next is a link to a
1982 video interview of an elderly man who had been Director of Research for the
1953 Congressional Reece Committee (House Resolution 217) to investigate tax-exempt foundations. His testimony was substantiated by Rene Wormser's 1958 book, counsel for the same Reece Committee, and Carroll Quigley, highly distinguished professor at Georgetown and mentor to President Clinton.
The next article is on
Andrew Carnegie, which references Napoloen Hill's book, commissioned by Carnegie, and Carnegie's own Gospel of Wealth (1889). His rare idealism and billions of dollars were used to start the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The Reece Committee determined that their actual purpose was to provoke wars via the State Department in a noble effort to forge a world order based on the Soviet Union that could sustain world peace.
The next article is on
international banking which is narrative story based on factual events.
The next is a link to
The Yes Men documentary which is obviously satire and proof I'm not a fascist.
Next is a
videotape of a FEMA agent (now under the Department of Homeland Security) speaking to Missouri rescue workers in July 2001 where he shockingly states the Founding Fathers and Christians are really terrorists.
Next is a political comic book called
How Stalin Hopes We Will Destroy America from my original 1951 copy.
Next is an
interview with Barr McClellan, President Johnson's former attorney and father of Scott McClellan, the White House Press Secretary. The video clip includes the White House Press Briefing when Scott is asked if he agrees with his
dad's book about LBJ killing President Kennedy [with "Big Oil" in Dallas and the "Military Industrial Complex"]. It's a clear example of situational irony, Scott doesn't confirm or deny his belief.
The next is a
hand written letter by President George Washington to Reverend George Washington Synder in 1798 where President Washington literally endorses the
"Doctrines of the Illuminati", Jacobinism, and references freemasonry. The link goes to the George Washington Papers at the Library of Congress. Any objection to that? If so contact them and inform them of the hoax.
To be fair, the Bavarian Illuminati was originally against religion and government, in an extreme Republican-sense of an ultimate libertarian ideology. Clearly these ideas were shared by the Jacobins who ignited the revolution of revolutions; the French Revolution. The Bavarian Illuminati is largely believed to have not survived its founders, yet its inexplicable to conceive that it didn't inspire other organizations of Germanic origin (e.g. Skull & Bones at Yale).
As a member of a fraternity, a Masonic lodge, or even as a Mormon, you'll have some understanding of the secret philosophy known as the Mysteries, which is used by all occult organizations, from ancient Jewish Mysticism (Kabbalah) to the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. Opinions can't trump facts and as someone who was unknowingly initiated
"formally into the Mysteries" as my certificate literally says for a Christian organization, there's no debating the validity of this philosophy.
The next link is a video to the
Enron Tapes, which is a video mix I made of
Greg Palast's excellent work, video of Bush, Bush Sr., Ken Lay, incriminating audiotapes of Enron employees, and an unreal Enron skit.
The last link is to the
Bank for International Settlements in Basal Switzerland. It is the bank of the Federal Reserve and all central banks in the world, immune from any jurisdiction, possessing near unlimited reserves and able to instantly create infinite amounts of money.
Undoubtedly there will be obnoxious responses to this diary. People spouting off wild accusations and baseless opinions. Mymridons unable to rationalize the concept of objective thought in the glaring light of damning evidence. Feel free to debate the authenticity of these sources, claim they are taken out of context, or argue their importance or lack of. Be sure to support your claims with facts as I have.
However, there is no need for personal insults for merely pointing out the knowledge you may lack.