Those of you following this diary may find it interesting how I waited in the cutty for Chief Dunn's lawyer, Charlie Bauer, to maintain materially false statements to the Court, then pounce on the both of them.
Here is the latest:
http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/...
http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/...
Now comes Plaintiff to issue this Memorandum, to note that Counsel for Defendant Dunn has issued materially false statements to this Honorable Court in successfully dodging a subpoena for all the emails between Plaintiff and him, bellowing in Open Court, regarding a handful of non-substantive `Mickey-Mouse' emails:
"That's the Universe, Your Honor."
But he was lying, and even a cursory look through his Microsoft Outlook program would have told him that; and he knew that. He had a duty to check his Outlook program before making that affirmative misrepresentation to the Court, which he still has not retracted.
This is particularly troubling because of the number of times that Attorney Bauer has accused Plaintiff of manufacturing and/or manipulating documents, as Plaintiff has noted in the Court file and herein again in his substantive affidavit at Attachment 1a/1b [final copy is notarized and contains reference to the fact that Bauer has actually had the nerve to accuse me of falsifying evidence.]
And this is nothing new from Bauer or Dunn. See the hijinx they played at Chief Dunn's Deposition as reflected in the lunchtime blawg entry "Depo Update: They are violating Rule 98," as well as a letter written to Attorney Mark Broth [similar to this one], noting that the Chief had failed to produce the last page of the legal updates that Plaintiff had provided to the NAACP the first week of January, which should have been page 187. Attachments 2, 3, and 4.
See what happens to attorneys who lie, in In re Feld's Case 149 N.H. 19, 815 A.2d 383, N.H.,2002., and generally State v. Atkins, September 28, 2000 Rockingham #96-175 (2000).
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Enough is enough. This court has witnessed a series of lies and deceptions set forth by Defendant Dunn and his Attorney Charlie Bauer that must be immediately addressed, and addressed firmly. Attorney Bauer and Defendant Dunn have besmirched the legal community with their systematic patterns of morally and legally aberrant behavior. A copy of this pleading will be forwarded to any and all applicable regulatory agencies.
_________
CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D.
Plaintiff pro se
PS: The resemblance between this case and Feld, supra, at 23, 387 is uncanny: They are both from New Hampshire. They both involve Plaintiffs with reasonable discovery requests, and a Defense attorney who either lied about receipt of, or failed to provide accurate information that they held in their possession and control. And in both circumstances, the falsity was material to the case at bar. What makes this case even more egregious, however, is the continued and several nature of the transgressions.
Moreoever, the New Hampshire Supreme Court noted in a passage that is clearly uber dicta, that "In Kalil's Case, 146 NH 466, 773 A.2d 647 (2001) for example, we sanctioned a lawyer for lying to a court, even though his misstatement was corrected almost immediately, and did not concern the material facts or issues of the litigation."(emphasis added).
In fact, the Court referenced Kalil on another occasion, in O'Meara's Case, No. LD-2002-004:
As an initial matter, we note that "no single transgression reflects more negatively on the legal profession than a lie." Kalil's Case, 146 N.H. 466, 467 (2001) (quotation omitted). Thus, we have ordered disbarment for attorney misconduct involving dishonesty."
I couldn't have said it any better.
How I wound up working for high-class restaurants in undergrad/law school, then eating at them for the next 15 years, then working at them again, is fascinating to many. And it happened because I had the balls to go after lying-assed attorneys like Charlie Bauer and the corrupt judges who hid their deceitful ways. As one very chill customer at job #2 noted last night, "The Lord knows when people aren't doing right, and I would never wish anything bad upon the Chief, but they will have to answer for what they did," to which I stated, "I'm more Zen-Buddhist, but it's All Good. Just stay true to your core, maintain your integrity and it will all come out in the wash."
.................
I am pleased to share this Memorandum on this board and with collegiate students in Connecticut now, and law students and the general public soon. I'll be working both of my jobs today, so I may miss your comments but whatever anyone has to say, I welcome the commentary because that is central to the purported mission and ideals of this fine country, as reduced to one simple Amendment, most appropriately..... the First.